Ed Oscuro wrote:
brentsg wrote:There still may be some legal liability for those that develop the petition, and publicly host it.. regardless of whether the individuals gave the information for that purpose.
Eh? This is a freedom of speech matter as far as I can tell. Please explain what they would be liable for.
I'm not in the legal profession, but I work with PCI and PII data security and the related policies every day. It's got nothing to do with free speech.
Now don't confuse how you THINK things should work with how they -might- work. And also remember that the -might- scenario is often a very expensive one to explore when it comes to legal matters.
I go to McDonalds and order a cup of hot coffee. They give me a cup of hot coffee, which I spill and burn myself. I sue McDonalds and win because the hot coffee I wanted was hot (ok it was scalding, so maybe not a perfect example). It was found that McD's and the customer both shared fault.
So I setup a website and ask people to post their personal information online. They do... willingly. Someone steals the data that was accumulated and hosted online. They use to perpetrate some fraud, steal some identities, whatever. Maybe a completely innocent person gets defrauded in the process and sues everyone. Maybe I realize it was stupid to post my info publicly but now that I'm a "victim" I sue the people who requested my data because "I didn't know better".
All I'm saying is that there's plenty of room for shared responsibility here, especially in light of all the current movement to protect such data. And even if the court takes the common sense route, just defending yourself can be an expensive proposition.
Anyways this turned into more than I intended, all I originally wanted to do was state that 1) the petition shouldn't ask for all that data... 2) if it's collected to be shared with Cave fine, but it shouldn't be publicly posted, and 3) people shouldn't be posting that much data about themselves publicly. It's just the world we live in now.
Peace.