No point in being on poor terms over nothing at all. The world will be a nicer place if people just stop fighting eh?antron wrote:Nice response.
I totaly didn't expect you to make me feel guilty about my comments now.
Take it easy dude.

No point in being on poor terms over nothing at all. The world will be a nicer place if people just stop fighting eh?antron wrote:Nice response.
I totaly didn't expect you to make me feel guilty about my comments now.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Of all the people who I'd expect to know when a building is going to collapse, an experienced fireman would probably be one of them. Edit: I'm sure that sort of thinking would probably lump me in as a co-conspirator, trusting a government official and allDEL wrote:Stuff like the firecrew member in front of wtc7 saying on live camera "clear the area, the bulding's coming down" before it dropped. Foreknowledge like that is odd.
The shit-ton of debris that hit WTC7 when WTC1 collapsed doesn't count for anything? I'm usually all for questioning things and keeping an open mind, and indeed, we may never know everything about 9/11 100%. But you can't just ignore huge amounts of a building twice the size of WTC7 impacting it and go "OOOOOOOOOOOH MYSTERY AFOOT".DEL wrote:That bulding was suffering fires, hadn't been struck by a Boeing and the structural load failure/pancake theory clearly could not apply to it, plus no tall building had ever collapsed from fires before that day.
that's exactly what NIST says about WTC7. they don't pretend to know everything about its collapse.DEL wrote:maybe
Really, the whole "Obama is really ______" (not American, a Socialist, a Communist, taking away our freedom to ______) thing is just a front for the word they really want to fill in the blank with. Oh crap, it sounds like I'm starting a conspiracy!They can't get over the fact a black man is president. They just can't say so directly.
Well, Clinton was really a black guy (and Gore and Kerry were "too European") so it all balances out.BryanM wrote:Obama is really a white guy
The US had a fairly large hand in creating the Taliban.antron wrote:And in the case of 9/11 we have to solve the problem or why it happened in the first place (getting the Arab world to quit giving money to very evil, very smart men). How are we going to do this if so many people don't even acknowledge who did it?
Isn't that effectively what the flag@whitehouse.gov thing was? Why can't people freely badmouth things they disagree with?Ed Oscuro wrote:I mentioned a new favorite conspiracy in my Scariest Thing thread: Obama using a rumor control operation to squelch the First Amendment.
undamned wrote:Isn't that effectively what the flag@whitehouse.gov thing was? Why can't people freely badmouth things they disagree with?Ed Oscuro wrote:I mentioned a new favorite conspiracy in my Scariest Thing thread: Obama using a rumor control operation to squelch the First Amendment.
-ud
Hydrogen will never happen. The laws of physics have rendered it impossible. Exxon will have to find something else to do with itself. Car makers will have to suck up the loss in profits from dozens of parts wearing out.DEL wrote:(which may be less important as hydrogen powered cars gain more support -> Honda/California)
You don't understand. Obama's making a list of patriotic dissenters that he'll give to his ACORN stormtroopers and they'll come to your house and turn your kids black.antron wrote:why can't people create a website to list all the bullshit peolpe are freely speaking about? isn't that free speach too?
And gay, don't forget gay!Ex-Cyber wrote:You don't understand. Obama's making a list of patriotic dissenters that he'll give to his ACORN stormtroopers and they'll come to your house and turn your kids black.
claiming that a FEW people at the top simply let it happen is about as close to a conspiracy theory as you can get while remaining in the realm of intelligence. some people who are a lot more intellectually accomplished than charlie sheen have signed the 911truth.org petition (like howard zinn). as far as science is concerned, it's a safe position. and if only a few people knew they could have kept quiet. but ALL events like this come with these theories, think Pearl Harbor, and the Lusitania. you're nothing new and no one will give a shit about this when you're all dead.DEL wrote:Aw Hell, Charlie Sheen is just as nuts as me:-
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... ssage.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HczC73EC ... re=related
Like me, he's not pointing fingers, just asking questions about oddities.
Anyway, moving past the physical stuff of the day you get Michael Ruppert and this speech in November 2001:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 9024486145#
I found a lot of it fascinating. Not the Peak Oil stuff (which may be less important as hydrogen powered cars gain more support -> Honda/California), but his assertion that at least 500billion Dollars of drug money gets laundered by America every year and that the US Stock Exchange is very reliant on it. He gives a hypothetical scenario of a Cartel kingpin calling an exec in General Electric and ordering 200mil of legit GE product, thereby laundering the ca$h. It would be safe to assume that GE wouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth and accept the 200mil.....& so on with other large companies.
He also mentioned the companies behind the correctional infrastructure in the US actually calling for more inmates to fill the jails because its a good money earner for them. Needless to say the US has one third of all incarcerated people in the World at the moment. Somebody had told me about this before, but this is the first time I'd seen it documented.
He also mentions the 6 x higher than normal 'put options' on the two Airlines that remain unclaimed (no surprise).
In short, I was impressed at Mr Ruppert's knowledge just two months after the 2001 Attacks. His line at the time was not based on the physical oddities of the actual attacks, but on the fact that the US Authorities "Let it happen" (his words) despite being forewarned by Mossad and other sources. The Israeli firm in one of the Twin Towers - ZIM Shipping (I think?) vacated their office 1 week before the Attacks, breaking their lease.
You can see the guy has his own personal battleaxe to grind, but if you look beyond that, a lot of the facts he's disseminating are real eye-openers.
Now do you have 2 hours and 17 minutes to spare![]()
I'm talking about as the standard, not just as an expensive lawn statue. The only reason hydrogen has as much press as it does, is some very rich people wish the fairy tale was true. Sorry, but electric has won that fight.DEL wrote:It already has happened.
why compare hydrogen to electricity? compare it to a different chemical battery. that's all hydrogen is when it's in fuel cell powering an electric motor. were some companies looking at combusting it?BryanM wrote:I'm talking about as the standard, not just as an expensive lawn statue. The only reason hydrogen has as much press as it does, is some very rich people wish the fairy tale was true. Sorry, but electric has won that fight.DEL wrote:It already has happened.
Now if they'd spend some dough on those vactrains..... with perhaps the lowest amount of friction you'll be able to attain on land, these could move at a max of around 4,000 mph; it's like teleportation speeds.
I don't quite follow?antron wrote:why compare hydrogen to electricity? compare it to a different chemical battery. that's all hydrogen is when it's in fuel cell powering an electric motor. were some companies looking at combusting it?
What's the acceleration/deceleration rate, though? Above a certain point top speed is meaningless because you'd never hit it.BryanM wrote:Now if they'd spend some dough on those vactrains..... with perhaps the lowest amount of friction you'll be able to attain on land, these could move at a max of around 4,000 mph; it's like teleportation speeds.
Low enough to not annoy grannies. A coast to coast trip or one from New York to London would top out at an operational average speed of around 2500. You could still circle the globe in a day with short jumps of that size.Ex-Cyber wrote:What's the acceleration/deceleration rate, though? Above a certain point top speed is meaningless because you'd never hit it.