
My best recorded score is EDIT now 3432: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE4iBPxYt7A
If you experience problems with the game dropping input, try changing browsers (I was having problems in Firefox and Chrome performed much more accurately).
The score is simply 'how many spikes have scrolled off screen'. Sometimes you'll get a freebie where large amounts of spikes are going around you. But I think if one score is over double another the former is definitely better, for example.320x240 wrote:Fun game. I only managed 1246 and that one I couldn't feel. It felt like I had to fight a lot harder for some of the many 800-something I got.
I'm still trying to break 2k. Got six 1500-1600ish scores today. I think I won't get a REALLY good score until the weekend though - Circadian rhythms are a thing that exist.dunpeal2064 wrote:I see you Patashu
Open Broadcaster Softwaredunpeal2064 wrote:Nice score!
What are you using to record your runs? It may not be possible for me, since I'm, uh.... sorta playing while at work.
I haven't done that yet. I did get a slight bit of lag, but it wasn't too serious on my part (Yeah, I played this on firefox), to where the game would, indeed, become unplayable. I may try to do that later on, though, since you brought that point up.Patashu wrote:@PurpleTheGuy and Zil: Have you tried changing browsers, closing other programs, etc? I had an awful experience with lag when I tried playing it in Firefox, but it's perfect in Chrome even when recording.
Btw, I've noticed that the game throws walls in 'waves'. As in, it has an X gap position and a Y gap position, and those gaps are slowly bobbing up and down along their axis, and when it throws a wall of spikes, it's randomly centered around the current gap for that axis. Why this is useful to know? It reduces mental load - if the gap on one axis is proceeding in a direction, it's almost certainly going to keep going in that direction, wait at the edge a moment, reverse, etc. so you can expect this to happen, be right most of the time and you conserve attention energy by only needing to look for discrepancies.
Yeah, this belongs in off-Topic, doesn't it?Cagar wrote:Just out of curiosity, how is this related to Shoot em' ups?
If YGS2000 would be considered on-topic ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gz_71veAzzU ), this would be considered on-topic too.Cagar wrote:Just out of curiosity, how is this related to Shoot em' ups?