I'm inclined to agree, as the close up attacks are one of the things that make gunbird 2 superior to the strikers games, at least gameplay-wise And the fact that the sword move doubles as a shield is excellent. Find it weird that it doesn't get talked about much.
kidneythief wrote:I'm inclined to agree, as the close up attacks are one of the things that make gunbird 2 superior to the strikers games, at least gameplay-wise And the fact that the sword move doubles as a shield is excellent. Find it weird that it doesn't get talked about much.
I find it even weirder that neither game in the series has gotten home ports, as they are both superior to any Psikyo shmup I've ever played, particularly the Japanese-themed ones.
Jeez, guys - he's just a kid. And i would have to agree with him - those mech pilots in Vasara II are most definetly dicklords.
To be honest i really didn't enjoy the game that much. Now that i think about it it was kinda... hollow. I can't see myself putting forth another hour of playing that game. I'll try the first one out before i make to many judgements, though.
On a brighter note we also played through Pang! 3, Final Fight, Metal Slug 3, and Xexex (which was awesome).
the vasara games are pretty sweet as far as i'm concerned. i absolutely love the atmosphere and graphical style of it too. think i'll have to boot up mame to try and get onto bulletmagnet's hs listing. or not. i suck. end.