Do I give a shit

What's that I hear in the backgroundRandorama wrote: Blah blah blah...
Lock this thread, please.

Your wife's calling you to turn on MAME

Edit: spelling

Stupid smartphones!
What's that I hear in the backgroundRandorama wrote: Blah blah blah...
Lock this thread, please.
I can't believe you went with this instead of Cho Aniki.Skykid wrote:Oh it is. Shmups are gay. The gayest in-fact.
I think one or two ppl will cheat, IIRC someone from a SF tourney a couple of years ago was caught out using both 1 & 2 players in Mars Matrix.This is true. On the other hand, anyone who actually likes this genre won't cheat anyway. Besides which, even if ports exist, you will still HAVE your arcade versions where the score is absolutely legitimate at all times. Pull your head out of your ass.Code: Select all
Arcades make it so you can't cheat!
I'd stick my neck out and say that's gayer than Cho Aniki. And probably illegal.spineshark wrote: I can't believe you went with this instead of Cho Aniki.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
I'll take it as polite joke, as I recall you being a nice guy, CHI. But good luck with being convinced that shoddy PC ports that will never point (page 6...) will destroy Casino Arcade, and all that Jazz.CHI wrote: What's that I hear in the background![]()
Your wife's calling you to turn on MAME![]()
Icarus in pretentious elitism shocker.Randorama wrote:Your last few posts in this thread are embarassing, in their pretentious elitism.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
What does being an admin have to do with my opinions on porting? All of your posts are embarrassing for a variety of reasons.Randorama wrote:Your last few posts in this thread are embarassing, in their pretentious elitism.
And you were an administrator on this forum? Unbelievable.
We all know. Was this the point that the original author of this thread was trying to make? No.
Have you been on crack, of late?
Including yourself? It'd certainly save us from your nonsense.Randorama wrote:Lock and ban everyone who posted in this thread, please.
I was always a belligerent asshole.Skykid wrote:Icarus just spent a weekend with me and I turned him into a belligerent asshole. Normal service will resume shortly.
If I do that the poll would reset... or so I think...Cagar wrote:BTW Cave might be reading this thread since I linked this to them in my message. Just look at this mess, the poll answers don't make much sense either. Just change the poll question to "Would you BUY a pc port...." and it's good
Let's censor our own members to make us look like we care about something that we don't, so that Cave does our bidding.Cagar wrote:Damn... could mods do that? Removing all posts in this thrrad would be a good idea tooO. Van Bruce wrote:If I do that the poll would reset... or so I think...Cagar wrote:BTW Cave might be reading this thread since I linked this to them in my message. Just look at this mess, the poll answers don't make much sense either. Just change the poll question to "Would you BUY a pc port...." and it's good
RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
If CAVE released PC ports I would not buy any but I would probably pirate them for a quick blast.How would you feel about PC releases of Cave games?
RegalSin wrote:Rape is very shakey subject. It falls into the catergory of Womens right, Homosexaul rights, and Black rights.
Oh cool... from the "old guard", who is on the gaming industry?AntiFritz wrote:Theirs no one from cave but theirs people from the industry.
Plenty of folk who probably don't fancy having it broadcast. None of them are going to help get Cave games on Steam either.O. Van Bruce wrote:Oh cool... from the "old guard", who is on the gaming industry?AntiFritz wrote:Theirs no one from cave but theirs people from the industry.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
O. Van Bruce wrote:Last time I saw no one of this forum was from CAVE or even from the videogame industry...
I mean, not as retailers, but as developers on a comercial company (I'm not including doujin works either)rancor wrote:O. Van Bruce wrote:Last time I saw no one of this forum was from CAVE or even from the videogame industry...
That's a joke, right?
Why would you think that?O. Van Bruce wrote:I mean, not as retailers, but as developers on a comercial company (I'm not including doujin works either)
I answer you at the end:Icarus wrote:
What does being an admin have to do with my opinions on porting?
Hopefully you mean in this thread, but let me answer you:All of your posts are embarrassing for a variety of reasons.
This was not a given at the beginning of the discussion, in the sense that O. Van Bruce didn't know this.What the OP was asking for was opinions on possible PC ports. I've already given my opinion, as clear as I can:
1) Cave probably wouldn't make much money out of it anyway, given that the current user base here that would use Steam for anything is already pretty low to begin with, and it is unknown if selling anything on Steam would give them more money than a disc release on some console or other.
They would have to rewrite the game up from scratch, which is not feasible, and seems to cause all kinds of problem (see list of flaws you mention about CONSOLE ports). Trap15's explanation on page 6 gave the missing information about this aspect: Cave would have to re-program the game from scratch, as they use hardware-b(i)ased software.2) Even when porting to a console which has a single hardware configuration, their ports turn out uneven in quality, with ports ranging from fabulous (which normally end up being ported "out-of-house", like Arika's Daioujou/Espgaluda, M2's Mushi Futari 1.5, and 5pb's Ketsui Extra) to questionable (MMP!/PS, Guwange), with inexplicable porting choices (Deathsmiles NA missing slowdown, recently resolved) and user interface problems (missing 4:3 mode in some ports, extremely complicated to set up display modes etc). Therefore, what would happen when Cave port to a system with a lot of possible hardware and software configurations?
Console or PC, there is simply no garantuee that the ports would be economically feasible and somewhat close to original in the first place. And, I don't think that Cave would give a toss about uninformed polls on a gaijin thread, if their balance sheets say that there is no money for a project of dubious appeal.And what if the requirements end up being quite high? What makes you think that someone who is loathe to pay for an imported console is willing to spend several hundred $/£ on computer bits so they can play Saidaioujou? Not everyone upgrades their components on a regular basis like the PC gamer crowd does - there are probably users here still running old Pentium III CPUs and Windows XP SP2.
3) They're already known to be financially stretched, expending resources on pursuing a new venture that may or may not be financially viable or successful could be a killer blow to them.
I don't think that I ever defended PC ports in any of my posts in this thread. I have one port, Shikigami III, which looks ok but does not run on my current PC, as it is an old machine that I am using before buying a new one. I never bothered with other ports, for the reasons you list.4) If PC ports are the way to save niche companies, why aren't we seeing an influx of shooting game devs on the format? Where's G.Rev? Milestone? Takumi? PC ports have come out before, and they've been all over the place in quality, and not very successful financially.
Fine, but do you honestly think that they need the input from shumps.com?5) I have no problems with PC ports per se, but I would rather they balance the books in the way they know how first, before they look to new avenues of revenue.
Simon, please. Keep track of what I am saying, thanks.For someone who makes himself out as intelligent, you're sure lacking reading comprehension, common sense, and the ability to argue points coherently.
Randorama wrote:Lock and ban everyone who posted in this thread, please.
And as always, you show not to have any witty sense of humour. Well done, I think this the one millionth time you SEEMINGLY fail to get this very joke. Such a shame.Icarus wrote: Including yourself? It'd certainly save us from your nonsense.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts