Western literature wasn't either, until Shakespeare showed up.
Movies weren't either, until Orson Welles and a few other people showed up.
Do you see why this is a nonsensical and ignorant statement?
Don't be daft.... who the hell plays a shooter for the story. Who the hell plays a fighter for the story. Who the hell plays Mario for the story, or Zelda for that matter. If you do... what do you do with the other 70 percent (or far more) of the time when the game play takes front seat.
A game can have a good story and be mostly story, but games are called games. They aren't called books or film for a reason. A good story can elevate a good game but it's not needed. My point is I don't condemn a game over the "story". If I did I wouldn't have a lot to play.
If a game comes up to the quality of a movie like 2001 or something one day, great. If they don't.... I'll live. Your taking my Shakespeare way to serious. If you like reading books or watching films don't get pissed b/c another format does or does not emulate it perfect. Kinda like bitching about a truck not being as good at something as a car is.
I don't need a movie or game to be the end all of plots to find entertaining and enjoyable. Still it's great when they do offer up a great story.
So... having said that. I find Metal Gear's story to be entertaining. *GASP* Even more enjoyable than alot of other games I own or have played through the years.