
Raiders and Crusade are almost equal on my scale, but the latter has Sean Connery!
Never do, but it's always nice to find one guy in there with taste, so thanks for that Dan. I remember thinking it was way more sucky than it should have been last time I watched it (a while ago now). Good to hear I didn't dream it.dan76 wrote:No, it really is rubbish! Don't doubt yourself.Skykid wrote: I really don't understand all the Crusade love. It's not rubbish by any stretch, but it's definitely the weakest.
Jesus, what kind of drugs are you lot on?Sumez wrote:Dude. Crystal Skull was better than Temple.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Win.nZero wrote: Skykid chose... poorly.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
Do I detect irony here?dan76 wrote: Taste, it's not something that can be learned.
Nope, it's just Capshaw. Not for being sexist, just being bad. I mean, I guess if you were a pretentious prick you could say that the Indy series is Orientalism 101. But that's part of what gives it its charm, for whatever that's worth. It's pulp fiction that hearkens back to the Edgar Rice Burroughs days with an awesomely skewed portrayal of history. It's sort of like modern fiction with a romantic portrayal of the samurai. No it's not accurate in the least, but who really cares?blackoak wrote: People also like to think highly of themselves by noting that Short Round is racis', Kapshaw is sexis', the film is "dated" in its portrayal of foreignness, etc...
Do it, film is badass. They jump out of a plane in a fucking dinghy and live. All good.Moniker wrote: I'm all psyched to go watch temple of doom right now. It's been too long.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
SHMUP sale page.Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
You two aren't the only ones. The only part about Crusade I rather like is how Indiana and his dad are scoring with the same chick.Skykid wrote:dan76 wrote:No, it really is rubbish! Don't doubt yourself.Skykid wrote: I really don't understand all the Crusade love. It's not rubbish by any stretch, but it's definitely the weakest.
SHMUP sale page.Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
Dewd, the mine cart ride is exceptional, even today. It holds up so well, it's a real rollercoaster ride. That's then followed by "water!", cliff hanging, a Star Wars tribute, and the gutsiest move Indy ever pulled: chopping a rope bridge in half with a shit load of people on it.CMoon wrote:The first half of Temple of Doom is probably the best of the Indiana Jones movies, unfortunately there's that second half...
Ah good. Welcome to camp sensible.CMoon wrote: You two aren't the only ones. The only part about Crusade I rather like is how Indiana and his dad are scoring with the same chick.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
The ending of Raiders is a forever thing. Like the heart-removal ritual in ToD. It's not about the action, it's about the power & the glory.Skykid wrote:CMoon wrote:Now compare that to the ending of Raiders - box opens up, ghosts come out, kill Nazis, the end - and we're talking a big screen adventure finale like few others.
It's really not as good as you remember it.Sumez wrote:Come on, Crusade was pure fucking adventure all the way through. He invades a nazi castle, escapes from a blimp, jumps from car to car punching bad guys across the desert, gets Hitler's autograph and finds the holy grail! It has Marcus Brody and Sallah back in the act, two characters that were sorely missed in Temple, and tops it off with Sean god damn Connery. How can you compete with that?
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
That dude took out the heart-ripping ritual. What's the point of watching the freaking movie without that part?emphatic wrote:http://fanedit.org/588/
Come on, the movie's supposed to be like that. How about, "Throw me the idol, I throw you the whip?" That door is halfway down, then it's up again. Indiana Jones is a tribute to those old serials, and the effects are supposed to be cheesy.neorichieb1971 wrote:The fight on the conveyor belt is ridiculous. One second Indy is about to have his head reshaped, the next second the music starts playing and they are 6 feet from the roll crusher.
Matskat wrote:This neighborhood USED to be nice...until that family of emulators moved in across the street....
You got SERVED!!Skykid chose... poorly.
Win.
Damn Tim, you know there are quite a few Americans out there who still lives in tents due to this shitty economy, and you're dropping loads on a single game which only last 20 min. Do you think it's fair? How much did you spend this time?
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Matskat wrote:This neighborhood USED to be nice...until that family of emulators moved in across the street....