I would have played it at the time if Squaresoft actually released it in PAL areas.Obiwanshinobi wrote:Do you have the courage to play right throuh Xenogears and face the truth about this game?
Yes, Xenogears aged poorly, but that's because the 3D is now obsolete. Newer 3D games make the older 3D games look bad because we compare them. Those 2D jRPGs from the SNES era remain the same, since 2D can't age. There have been a fair number of 2D games over the last 10 years, but most of them have either been a) trrying to recreate the past, like Megaman 9 b) trying to be "artistic" like Braid or c) end up looking like a total flash game. It's by console limitations in which the games look the way they do.
Xenogears didn't even look all that good when it came out originally, but the graphics don't seem to matter. The plot was: gundam vs. gundam ~story here~. Dragon Quest sells the same plot yearly (boy saves world) and the graphics are nothing startling, but it's more of the same and people like that.
Now you have PS1 Classics on the PSN store which you can play on your PSP (in 1:1, which is nice) or on a HDTV with an insanely blurry filter--unless you go out of your way to use an upscaler. You have Virtual Console as well as XBLA, so we're not by any means trying to forget the past.
I think the "Japanese" side is more or less: make western styled games (this isn't necessarily a bad thing, see Demon's Souls, God Hand, Dead Rising, and other Japanese-made western styled games), or recreate what has already worked in the past. That isn't to say that new material won't come out which is also good, though, and Resonance of Fate is a good example.
Anyway yeah, what the hell was my point in my replying? Oh yeah, claiming that a massively acclaimed RPG is awful is absurd. It worked at the time.