

I go out to clubs rarely, so most of this is in the house. However, until my kid goes to college, I don't see myself ever being able to "enjoy" sound outside of the headphones. My wife can hear a pin drop as well, so I'll need to wait until she hits the road (or I own a studio). So, I just buy WAV in the hopes that one day it'll pay off. AFAIK, nobody sells 24/96 digital music. At least not what I'm playing.cools wrote:Oh absolutely, it's a waste for playback on a club setup.
It's not like this music isn't listened to in a home environment too though.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
Apparently not as many people here claim to be vinyl heads. But, my point being, the argument is the same. We have settled for shittier quality for video as well. There's the argument of older games (being re-released still) filtered and interlaced to hell. As per before, we've had this debate in the main forum forever. Nobody has ever disagreed that for 15khz 2D games (which make up the majority of the ones this whole interweb site is about), the best quality is RGB (extra points for arcade monitor over consumer television). Only a handful of people have this setup though. Everyone else has settled for shittier quality.elmagicochrisg wrote:Not exactly the same thing...GaijinPunch wrote:Exact same thing.Stormwatch wrote:Not the same thing at all.
If you want to make a comparison with videogames, than that would mean you want top quality gaming in your livingroom (a console), and you'd settle for shittier quality on the road (a portable).
Compare this with music and you'd want the best possible sound at home (vinyl) and settle for shittier quality on the road (mp3/wave).
This is not the case. Both for in house and outdoors use we have settled for shittier quality.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
Your words are strange and unfamiliar. So is the game to the far left?Kiel wrote:on topic![]()
I suppose you could say Cho Aniki is strange and unfamiliar.Dragoforce wrote:Your words are strange and unfamiliar. So is the game to the far left?Kiel wrote:on topic![]()
Ah, the PCE cover is little bit toned down than the later gamesKiel wrote:I suppose you could say Cho Aniki is strange and unfamiliar.Dragoforce wrote:Your words are strange and unfamiliar. So is the game to the far left?Kiel wrote:on topic![]()
Nice!mesh control wrote:Wipeout T-shirt
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Awesome - the map is the lovely part. Most of mine are flea market (or here in the UK 'car boot sale') bargains. I've got a few turntables, some old FM radios, and my pride and joy, an old 1950 cigarette vending machine.robivy64 wrote: This was a flea market gem. $10 fully working with all of the pieces including the hard-to-find detachable cover and map.
I see. Makes total sense. Of course, despite my 'who gives a shit?' argument with regard to which platform/format is best, there's clearly times when either digital or otherwise is clearly the best choice.GaijinPunch wrote:I mix stuff in the 2-3 minute zone. If you have a 6 minute track, that leaves little time to cock around. So, in that case, digital saves my ass... in fact, w/o a third deck I'd say even the best DJ would have issues doing the same mix as you have to pull the record out and slap it on.offer a little more leeway for using a shoddy set-up (DJing of an old '78 for example, doesn't require the cutting edge).
Now you're getting into defining "what is art" and even stickier subjects. As pointed out on a DJ forum I go to, 90% of the people in the crowd wouldn't give a fuck if you went up there w/ an iPod and hit shuffle. But, I'm one of those guys that has to know what's going on under the sheets.bad scratches, out of time beats, terrible pitch control and a lot of shouting (like an anarchic DJ Yoda really, but far better) and he still does an amazing job of getting the crowd dancing.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
I've seen him a couple of times and he's as erratic and unpredictable as his mixes. Preceding his awful showing at Bangface last year, he was so shit-faced that he actually had the audacity to say "Sorry guys, I'm fucked on drugs but so are you lot so it doesn't matter." He kind of missed the point that we'd paid through the nose for him to perform while we got fucked. I can't deny the dude's got a great imagination though.jonny5 wrote:+1 on shitmat...dudes on glue or something![]()
some of the wackiest mixes ive ever heard....i would love to see him live
Lol!Rupert H wrote:he was so shit-faced that he actually had the audacity to say "Sorry guys, I'm fucked on drugs but so are you lot so it doesn't matter." He kind of missed the point that we'd paid through the nose for him to perform while we got fucked. I can't deny the dude's got a great imagination though.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
For some reason the PC release of Rollcage Stage 2 went by the name of Death Track Racing in the US though. Superfluous name changes were all the rage back then, I guess.PC Engine Fan X! wrote:There's "Rollcage: Stage II" with bonus OST worth getting also. It got a proper Stateside release as well.
PC Engine Fan X! ^_~
I've played Rollcage 2 a fair amount but didn't end up liking it overall. RC1 has a simplicity and streamlined feel that I think was lost when they made RC2. They changed the physics from RC1, and you don't get the same sense of speed when you've blazing through a track. The only aspect of RC2 I like over RC1 is the multiplayer deathmatch. RC2 has more weapons, and diverse environments to play in.PC Engine Fan X! wrote:There's "Rollcage: Stage II" with bonus OST worth getting also. It got a proper Stateside release as well.
PC Engine Fan X! ^_~