In any case, I LOVE rail shooters and I am getting a Cube, so I'd love to know about any good ones.

It's not quite a rail shooter, and it's definitely not good. I'm not sure how much Treasure had to do with the game either... I've heard that they were involved many times, but it sure doesn't show. Don't waste your money on this unless you get it CHEAP.Thunder Force wrote:I think Treasure released one called Dragon Drive...
P.N.03 is not a rail shooter.dave4shmups wrote:So far, I only know about StarFox Assault and P.N.O.3 (which I really enjoyed taking for a test drive!) -but you can move around 360 degrees in either of those games, so I don't even know if they qualify as rail shooters.
In any case, I LOVE rail shooters and I am getting a Cube, so I'd love to know about any good ones.
I don't like the original Space Invaders anymore... it was cute back in the day, but now I think of it more for historical value than play value. I highly, highly recommend Space Invaders 95 / Majestic 12 though!!! Give it a try (on mame if necessary) - it's faaaaaantastic.alpha5099 wrote:I don't really like Space Raiders. It's pretty dull really. But then again, I've never been the biggest fan of Space Invaders. The fact that it was such a hit has always slightly mystified me, it just seems so slow and plodding. But I grew up with Galaga, I was spoiled.
I fail to see how not liking Space Invaders has any relation to Space Raiders other than that they both share a basic concept. How exactly is Space Raiders dull? The action is non-stop.alpha5099 wrote:I don't really like Space Raiders. It's pretty dull really. But then again, I've never been the biggest fan of Space Invaders. The fact that it was such a hit has always slightly mystified me, it just seems so slow and plodding. But I grew up with Galaga, I was spoiled.
I just played this for the first time last night (first rail shooter too) at a friend's house. Both the graphics and the gameplay are simply amazing. I plan on picking up a copy at the earliest opportunity. It just may good enough to warrant the purchase of the system by itself.dave4shmups wrote:Oh hell, maybe I'd just be better off getting an XBOX (Panzer Dragoon Orta is better then 90% of shmups that I've played)...
Same here, but Super Space Invaders '91 is incredibly fun! The Sega Master System got a port of the game...if anyone thinks SMS Sagaia is an amazing port, they ain't seen nothin' yet!alpha5099 wrote:I don't really like Space Raiders. It's pretty dull really. But then again, I've never been the biggest fan of Space Invaders. The fact that it was such a hit has always slightly mystified me, it just seems so slow and plodding. But I grew up with Galaga, I was spoiled.
Most definately!snap monkey wrote:I just played this for the first time last night (first rail shooter too) at a friend's house. Both the graphics and the gameplay are simply amazing. I plan on picking up a copy at the earliest opportunity. It just may good enough to warrant the purchase of the system by itself.dave4shmups wrote:Oh hell, maybe I'd just be better off getting an XBOX (Panzer Dragoon Orta is better then 90% of shmups that I've played)...
You need to stop believing what you hear about E3.dave4shmups wrote: Plus, the news from E3 is that Microsoft is going to release something like 200 more games for the XBOX just in the next year. Awesome stuff.
Dude, seriously, people say: "don't trust E3, don't trust IGN, don't trust 'Lamefaqs'"...WHO do you suggest I trust for this sort of thing?Cthulhu wrote:You need to stop believing what you hear about E3.dave4shmups wrote: Plus, the news from E3 is that Microsoft is going to release something like 200 more games for the XBOX just in the next year. Awesome stuff.![]()
The Xbox 1 has run it's course. Really. There are very few high-profile games left for the system in development, and 200 more games from MS is obviously wrong. MS hasn't released 50 games for the system. They haven't even released 30, I don't think. If you mean 200 total (which I assume) I hate to say it, but that's not going to happen either.
Also, if you're expecting good Japanese games... you're going to be left dead in the water as well. Japanese support for the system has always been spotty (except for a few notable titles and the very early days of the system, when Sega released a lot of stuff), and they've pretty much given up on the system entirely. I wouldn't be surprised if Ninja Gaiden Black this sept is the last Japanese game for the system.
Bar81 wrote:I fail to see how not liking Space Invaders has any relation to Space Raiders other than that they both share a basic concept. How exactly is Space Raiders dull? The action is non-stop.alpha5099 wrote:I don't really like Space Raiders. It's pretty dull really. But then again, I've never been the biggest fan of Space Invaders. The fact that it was such a hit has always slightly mystified me, it just seems so slow and plodding. But I grew up with Galaga, I was spoiled.
Flame war, wtf are you talking about; you're being *quite* defensive in the face of legitimate questions. I don't have a problem with you not liking a game, what I was commenting on were your complaints about the game which are just silly. Saying Space Raiders is the same game as Space Invaders is like saying that FarCry is the same game as Quake. It's a laughable comparison; by your astute analysis then any game that isn't genre inventing is the same as any initial game in a genrealpha5099 wrote:Bar81 wrote:I fail to see how not liking Space Invaders has any relation to Space Raiders other than that they both share a basic concept. How exactly is Space Raiders dull? The action is non-stop.alpha5099 wrote:I don't really like Space Raiders. It's pretty dull really. But then again, I've never been the biggest fan of Space Invaders. The fact that it was such a hit has always slightly mystified me, it just seems so slow and plodding. But I grew up with Galaga, I was spoiled.![]()
I don't know man, I didn't like the game. And it's the same damn game as Space Invaders. Throw in some more impressive enemies, faster action, some generic video game characters, and a cliched plot. It's Space Invaders deep down. I didn't like the game, simple as that.
Different strokes for different folks. It doesn't affect you, don't start another flame war over this. I'm a fool, I didn't give Space Raiders a fair chance, I was too narrow-minded to see the big picture. Just accept it.
I personally liked what I tried of the GG one better. The invaders crawl down in a slower manner in the SMS version and the gameplay seems a bit more fluid with the Game Gear version.dave4shmups wrote:Same here, but Super Space Invaders '91 is incredibly fun! The Sega Master System got a port of the game...if anyone thinks SMS Sagaia is an amazing port, they ain't seen nothin' yet!alpha5099 wrote:I don't really like Space Raiders. It's pretty dull really. But then again, I've never been the biggest fan of Space Invaders. The fact that it was such a hit has always slightly mystified me, it just seems so slow and plodding. But I grew up with Galaga, I was spoiled.
dave4shmups wrote:Oh hell, maybe I'd just be better off getting an XBOX (Panzer Dragoon Orta is better then 90% of shmups that I've played), and the rRevolution IS coming out next year-and it will probably be cheaper then either the 360 or the PS3.
I'm being defensive because you seem to me the kind of guy who jumps on things like this. (see that Saturn flame war a few days ago). And I'm certainly not making a huge leap in comparing Space Invaders and Space Raiders. Space Raiders is clearly Taito's attempt to modernize it's oldest franchise. I mean, they even have very similar names, both in sound and meaning. It's the same basic formula: character restricted to one dimensional movement, several barriers immediately above you offering protection, formations of aliens coming for you.Bar81 wrote:Flame war, wtf are you talking about; you're being *quite* defensive in the face of legitimate questions. I don't have a problem with you not liking a game, what I was commenting on were your complaints about the game which are just silly. Saying Space Raiders is the same game as Space Invaders is like saying that FarCry is the same game as Quake. It's a laughable comparison; by your astute analysis then any game that isn't genre inventing is the same as any initial game in a genrealpha5099 wrote:Bar81 wrote: I fail to see how not liking Space Invaders has any relation to Space Raiders other than that they both share a basic concept. How exactly is Space Raiders dull? The action is non-stop.![]()
I don't know man, I didn't like the game. And it's the same damn game as Space Invaders. Throw in some more impressive enemies, faster action, some generic video game characters, and a cliched plot. It's Space Invaders deep down. I didn't like the game, simple as that.
Different strokes for different folks. It doesn't affect you, don't start another flame war over this. I'm a fool, I didn't give Space Raiders a fair chance, I was too narrow-minded to see the big picture. Just accept it.. Second, you further erode any credibility you might have by saying it's dull. I can understand someone not liking Space Raiders for several reasons but dull? Again, your comments seem to show that you have this game confused with another because it *certainly* isn't dull, in fact it's quite action packed as the shooting never stops and the enemies are dumped on you en masse. It's definitely more action packed than your sentimental "not slow and plodding" fave Galaga
![]()
Simply asking you to justify your comments isn't starting a flame war. Well...unless of course, your comments are silly and you get extremely defensive because they don't make any sense.
jp wrote:alpha5099 wrote:
(see that Saturn flame war a few days ago).
I missed a Saturn flame war?![]()
I'M KIDDING I'M KIDDING! Don't everybody write me a novel at once.