A question that is gonna sound sexist

A place where you can chat about anything that isn't to do with games!
User avatar
OmniGLH
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:20 pm

Post by OmniGLH »

sometimes I used to wonder
how the hell a ugly dude get a fine girls number

he getting juiced for his duckets
I tell a girl in a minute yo I drive a bucket
User avatar
CMoon
Posts: 6207
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:28 pm

Post by CMoon »

Don't worry, science will come to the rescue.

Soon you will be able to clone yourself, then give your clone a sex change and marry yourself.

The problem isn't modern women, but people in general. They suck!

Now if 50% of clone marriages end in divorce...well, shit, that's a more cosmic statement. I imagine atheism and suicide will skyrocket.
Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
SHMUP sale page.
User avatar
DEL
Posts: 4187
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: Oort Cloud

Post by DEL »

jpj wrote;
that's just what a large slice of american women are like, sadly.

i recommend you move
Move
but to where?

Japanese wives for instance will LEAVE you instantly if you lose your job - so that's that country ruled out.
Chinese women from the big cities like Shanghai and Beijing are VERY materialistic - so thats no good either.
UK - Nope, same as USA.
South America, Russia, mainland Europe - dunno :?:

---------------
Anyway, in my experience you can trust between 0% - 10% of girls/women not to cheat on you in a long-term relationship.

CMoon wrote;
The problem isn't modern women, but people in general. They suck!
This is very true....unfortunately.
User avatar
E. Randy Dupre
Posts: 954
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 2:26 pm

Post by E. Randy Dupre »

A question that is gonna sound sexist
Because it is.

Next?
User avatar
jpj
Posts: 3670
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:44 pm

Post by jpj »

DEL wrote:jpj wrote;
that's just what a large slice of american women are like, sadly.

i recommend you move
Move
but to where?

Japanese wives for instance will LEAVE you instantly if you lose your job - so that's that country ruled out.
Chinese women from the big cities like Shanghai and Beijing are VERY materialistic - so thats no good either.
UK - Nope, same as USA.
South America, Russia, mainland Europe - dunno :?:
cross the border :wink:
i can't imagine canadian women are as vapid ... or are they?
RegalSin wrote:Videogames took my life away like the Natives during colonial times.
User avatar
FIL
Posts: 1025
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:13 am
Contact:

Post by FIL »

Mail order brides are the way forward.
Image
User avatar
evil_ash_xero
Posts: 6245
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:33 am
Location: Where the fish lives

Post by evil_ash_xero »

E. Randy Dupre wrote:
A question that is gonna sound sexist
Because it is.

Next?
Well, maybe I am a bit. Sorry.

s/m
User avatar
Ed Oscuro
Posts: 18654
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: uoıʇɐɹnƃıɟuoɔ ɯǝʇsʎs

Post by Ed Oscuro »

Tricorner hats are ultra-patriotic...in fact they transcend patriotism

if McCain put one on his head it'd be like he brought down the shanksville airliner all by himself, won WWII, and was George Washington and Thomas Jefferson...fused into one person!
User avatar
gennss
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:20 pm

Post by gennss »

Hispanic women from latin america aren't all that different. Women from my grandparents generation are, but modern women don't "need" anyone anymore, hence the volatility of modern relationships. Women just like all people can be vipers watch yourself in all situations doesn't mean not to have relationships, means to hide part of whats in your wallet for rainy days.
---
Gennss
---
neritai
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:43 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Post by neritai »

Find a nice Korean girl, cut her arms and legs off, and remove her larynx.

Problem solved!

Alternate solution: frontal lobotomies.

Either way, you should end up with a partner you can be satisfied with.
A bonus with the first is that you can travel with her as checked luggage, given a sufficiently-sized suitcase.
User avatar
BryanM
Posts: 6412
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:46 am

Post by BryanM »

* stupidity removed *

The most famous site for misogyny is Men Are Better Than Women.
Last edited by BryanM on Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Daedalus
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:16 pm
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Re: A question that is gonna sound sexist

Post by Daedalus »

The misogyny overflows in this thread. Since I could say something about nearly every post, I'm just gonna keep my mouth shut and answer the main question.
evil_ash_xero wrote:Are relationships with the modern woman a pointless and temporary thing? And no I don't mean ALL women, just the vast majority of modern women in the US and Europe.

I just know a lot of guys who date women, and they all tend to get two-timed and money sucked out of them. Sometimes they get married and have a kid and the woman leaves him later for some other guy.

They seem to be hard to keep, and hard to please for long periods of time.
I see that argument about women "sucking the cash out of you" from a lot of people. Do they dig through your wallet at night? Few women are going to love an excessively stingy guy, but the other extreme is no good either. If she expects to be a significant drain on you, dump her. Although, if I can speculate a little here: I think a lot of guys who get into this want it both ways - They want to have a position of power in the relationship (by having the girl dependent on them) but don't want to actually pay for it.

As for cheating, yeah a lot of women do it, but every statistic shows the number of men to be higher. You can't really blame women for being human.


As for your friends, I have two thoughts on that. The first is, if a guy goes out with a certain kind of woman, and the relationship falls apart... generally he'll go for that same kind of woman again. Like women who keep getting into abusive relationships. It's stupid, but people do it.

The second is, you can't be entirely sure they're being honest in this. Very few people will admit "I fucked up, I ignored her, I didn't take care of her in bed, etc etc". Many times people have difficulty admitting it to themselves.


And ultimately, you're not getting married right now. Take it light - You don't need to "make it work" right now. You should be dating lots of different women in trying to find one who's right for you. Trying to make a long relationship out of something that isn't meant to be will only cause you both misery.
This is not similation. Get ready to destoroy the enemy. Target for the weak points of f**kin' machine. Do your best you have ever done.
User avatar
croikle
Posts: 426
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 12:45 am

Post by croikle »

BryanM wrote:You don't see black guys swimming in the olympics or doing many long distance races, just as you don't see white guys in short distance races.
How long distance are you talking about? Kenyans own at marathons: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marathon_( ... _ten_lists

edit: link isn't fully linkified, try this: http://xrl.us/osk6j
Image
User avatar
jonny5
Posts: 5081
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: toronto

Post by jonny5 »

jpj wrote:
DEL wrote:jpj wrote;
that's just what a large slice of american women are like, sadly.

i recommend you move
Move
but to where?

Japanese wives for instance will LEAVE you instantly if you lose your job - so that's that country ruled out.
Chinese women from the big cities like Shanghai and Beijing are VERY materialistic - so thats no good either.
UK - Nope, same as USA.
South America, Russia, mainland Europe - dunno :?:
cross the border :wink:
i can't imagine canadian women are as vapid ... or are they?
sadly no.....women here are just as annoying.....i think i have the only non-annoying girl in the country :wink:
User avatar
gennss
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:20 pm

Post by gennss »

Misogyny is likely a product of rampant feminism in the quest for sex equality. Problem is most people throw too hard to one side or the other.

IMO, the majority is stupidity and people trying to scam other people exercise caution with all humanity.

In addition, deep relationships are complex simply because human being have trouble understanding each other in general.
---
Gennss
---
User avatar
The n00b
Posts: 1490
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:31 am

Post by The n00b »

Sounds like quite a few guys don't know how to pick "modern women." If you find yourself constantly getting involved with women who only screw you out of your money and heart then I'd be taking a good hard look at who you are attracted to. It might be the case that you are actually attracted to these sorts of women.

That sucks because then you are pretty much the equivalent of a fat chick with low self esteem who puts out for any guy in the vain hope that she'll get a boyfriend that way. It's pretty sad.
Proud citizen of the American Empire!
User avatar
JoshF
Posts: 2833
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:29 pm
Contact:

Post by JoshF »

Hey how many of you guys out there are from Jersey? Any single guys in the audience? What's the deal with women?
MegaShock! | @ YouTube | Latest Update: Metal Slug No Up Lever No Miss
User avatar
TriggerHeartExelica
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:14 am
Location: Eureka, CA

Post by TriggerHeartExelica »

evil_ash_xero wrote:
Marshall banana wrote:
evil_ash_xero wrote:Modern woman...uh, today's women. Typical woman of today. You get the picture.

I just know a lot of guys who date women, and they all tend to get two-timed and money sucked out of them. Sometimes they get married and have a kid and the woman leaves him later for some other guy.

They seem to be hard to keep, and hard to please for long periods of time.

I have a lot of female friends, and it's the same thing with them too. Perhaps I just don't know enough "good" women to have a more positive view.

I just wondered if anyone here had long positive relationships with younger women(35 or younger) that could be influential on my point of view.

s/m
Well, girls are human - like men. What do you expect? Image

Just seems like they've surpassed men a bit recently. We used to be the bedhopping bastards, and now they tend to be even more so.

I'm telling you, it's girls gone wild.

s/m
Apparently you don't pay attention to history. In the past it has been socially unacceptable for a woman to sleep with anyone but the man she was married to. Yet men could do as they please and have as many sexual partners as they wished. Gee I wonder whats going to happen when that standard is no longer as enforced as it was in say the 1800's?
And you are a total and complete moron. Never make an assumption based on your bad relationships. Thats like a woman saying all men are pigs based on the fact she has had a string of bad relationships.
It’s almost over. It’s just begun.
User avatar
TriggerHeartExelica
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:14 am
Location: Eureka, CA

Post by TriggerHeartExelica »

BryanM wrote:* stupidity removed *

The most famous site for misogyny is Men Are Better Than Women.
I actually clicked that link and started reading. Then I had to stop because I could feel my hormones begin to rage at that atrocity DM calls a website. Seriously any man who thinks like that needs to be shot on sight.
It’s almost over. It’s just begun.
Daedalus
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:16 pm
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Post by Daedalus »

TriggerHeartExelica wrote:In the past it has been socially unacceptable for a woman to sleep with anyone but the man she was married to. Yet men could do as they please and have as many sexual partners as they wished.
You're saying that historically, it has been socially acceptable for married men to sleep around as they liked? And in America?

I'll agree that there was somewhat more social pressure on women than men, but it was generally socially unacceptable for either of them to do it. In spite of this, both men and women have frequently cheated on their spouses throughout history.
This is not similation. Get ready to destoroy the enemy. Target for the weak points of f**kin' machine. Do your best you have ever done.
User avatar
Ed Oscuro
Posts: 18654
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: uoıʇɐɹnƃıɟuoɔ ɯǝʇsʎs

Post by Ed Oscuro »

Daedalus wrote:
TriggerHeartExelica wrote:In the past it has been socially unacceptable for a woman to sleep with anyone but the man she was married to. Yet men could do as they please and have as many sexual partners as they wished.
You're saying that historically, it has been socially acceptable for married men to sleep around as they liked? And in America?
Man, if you owned a plantation, you could do whatever the fuck you wanted.

Only to black people though. (Or Indians.)

Also, BryanM missed a good chance to use the word "infamous." I read that guy's site a little once because some teenagers thought it was INCREDIBLY JUST (or something); he certainly doesn't provide evidence than men proofread better than women. Too stupid to entertain me for long.
themachinist
Posts: 780
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: Space, the final frontier.

Post by themachinist »

Not that I've dated a whole lot of women... but I've run into women who don't suck your money and will insist on paying every other date/thing more often than not.

The last person I was seeing I just adored and doted on her. That was sort of a bad move in retrospect but hey, what can you do.
User avatar
Skykid
Posts: 17655
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:16 pm
Location: Planet Dust Asia

Post by Skykid »

evil_ash_xero wrote: Just seems like they've surpassed men a bit recently. We used to be the bedhopping bastards, and now they tend to be even more so.

I'm telling you, it's girls gone wild.

s/m
Ha ha. It's funny how this is the same in the US as it is here in the UK (and probably everywhere else.)
I don't think its a bad thing, women are just more assertive these days and know what they want. The tables have definitely turned slightly.

I was having the same conversation with someone the other day who was also on the girlfriend hunt. We were remembering when we used to go drinking at 17 that the girls were generally quite quiet and either were out with a group of guys or a few girls. On the whole they were completely approachable.

These days they hang around in large groups of girls, generally wankered and screaming their heads off (come to Brighton on a Saturday night) and are the scariest bunch ever. Attempting to break into conversation usually results in getting insulted, laughed at by everyone and told to fuck off. I think blokes are more inclined to be the ones staying at home with their mates and a takeaway while the gals go out and raise hell.

Then again, perhaps you're just not looking in the right places. You don't have to be alcohol fueled to work up the courage to speak to someone, and generally good sober impressions will have a longer lasting effect. :wink:

As for the modern woman thing... dunno. They're all modern. So are we.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die

User avatar
spadgy
Posts: 6675
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: Casino Arcade (RIP), UK.

Post by spadgy »

Skykid wrote:come to Brighton on a Saturday night
God it's a terrifying experience at times!

Anyway, all I can say on this issue is women as a group are as varied as men and humans in general, so very very few blanket statements really apply. We're all different in the end.

I did, however, live with four girls for over two years, and I was the only guy in the flat. Brilliant fun, and very inciteful, but really, it was exactly like living with male mates - the things they talked about, their worries, their concerns with the opposite sex. There was this chart on the wall with sillouettes to demonstrate the penis sizes of their conquests, but I made every entry on it completely fraudulent and mishapen.

They like Sex In The City. That's the only real difference.
User avatar
Skykid
Posts: 17655
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:16 pm
Location: Planet Dust Asia

Post by Skykid »

spadgy wrote: They like Sex In The City. That's the only real difference.
Win! :D
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die

User avatar
TriggerHeartExelica
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:14 am
Location: Eureka, CA

Post by TriggerHeartExelica »

Daedalus wrote:
TriggerHeartExelica wrote:In the past it has been socially unacceptable for a woman to sleep with anyone but the man she was married to. Yet men could do as they please and have as many sexual partners as they wished.
You're saying that historically, it has been socially acceptable for married men to sleep around as they liked? And in America?

I'll agree that there was somewhat more social pressure on women than men, but it was generally socially unacceptable for either of them to do it. In spite of this, both men and women have frequently cheated on their spouses throughout history.
While its true it was socially unacceptable for both sexes to cheat on their spouses, who caught more shit for it when it came out men or women? Scarlet letter anyone?
It’s almost over. It’s just begun.
User avatar
gennss
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:20 pm

Post by gennss »

The n00b wrote: That sucks because then you are pretty much the equivalent of a fat chick with low self esteem who puts out for any guy in the vain hope that she'll get a boyfriend that way. It's pretty sad.
100% win.
---
Gennss
---
User avatar
Elixir
Posts: 5436
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 3:58 am

Post by Elixir »

This is a good thread.
User avatar
FIL
Posts: 1025
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:13 am
Contact:

Post by FIL »

Brighton is scary enough during the day.
Image
Daedalus
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:16 pm
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Post by Daedalus »

TriggerHeartExelica wrote:While its true it was socially unacceptable for both sexes to cheat on their spouses, who caught more shit for it when it came out men or women? Scarlet letter anyone?
The Scarlet Letter was a ficticious work written partly to criticize the puritans, a rabidly religious sect. The puritans of the time were outraged by it, but it became a bestseller in the rest of America. Thus I think it's safe to say that the puritanical values held by the town in the book were not representative of America at the time.

As for the events of the book itself, the only reason the woman received all the flak was because of her secrecy. The town wanted to find out the name of the man she slept with so they could punish him too, but she refused to divulge it.
This is not similation. Get ready to destoroy the enemy. Target for the weak points of f**kin' machine. Do your best you have ever done.
Post Reply