Dark Knight
Coens and Kubrick. Gutsy.
(also superbly overrated)
(also superbly overrated)
MegaShock! | @ YouTube | Latest Update: Metal Slug No Up Lever No Miss
I heard that Japanese folks were less bent out of shape about it than conscientious Americans (myself included, I more or less hated the film even though it wasn't too hard to watch - just the philosophical 'points' it presented were repugnant, of course we have to deal with the gimme Native American guilt thread the directors threw in as a gimme). Is this true? Does Japan look back at this time with fondness, as a way of getting into the modern age? Are Americans too likely to get hung up on cultural destruction, and too unwilling to acknowledge the benefits of the modern order? Are the Japanese unaware how crazy Cruise has been over the last decade?GaijinPunch wrote:Hmm... well, to each his own. Never understood what everyone liked about the Last Samurai. Perhaps b/c I spent most of my professional life in Japan it seemed horribly fake to me.
All rhetorical questions, but I don't have any definite answers.
Miller's Crossing, right?CMoon wrote:Wut?GaijinPunch wrote: Big Lebowski...excellent, but I don't think it's quite the Coen Brothers' best, but it's good.
Was laughing before I read the fine print, which is overkill imoJoshF wrote:Coens and Kubrick. Gutsy.
BONUS: here's skykid complaining about the dialogue
and then putting up Dr. Strangelove as one of the best movies of all time
I like it when people allow a movie's billing to determine how they view the script. "Hey it's billed as a farce. FUNNY APPRECIATE CIRCUIT TURN ON!!1"
also who was bitching about how 'people don't talk like that' (Harvey Dent's speech and William Fitchner's bank manager are the only things that comes to mind, but a lot of the rest of the film was pretty realistic)
Nope. Being overrated has nothing to do with actual quality. Those movies just tend to be flagrantly overrated because pseudo-intellectuals like to cut and paste from the critical orthodoxy .Was laughing before I read the fine print, which is overkill imo

(either they want to be in the smarty club or lack the ability to analyze for themselves)
Last edited by JoshF on Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MegaShock! | @ YouTube | Latest Update: Metal Slug No Up Lever No Miss
Here's another opinion on the Dark Night... Very good movie overall, but the ending got corny (maybe the last 1/5th or so of the movie). The Joker was probably one of my all time favorite movie characters but Two Face looked silly, they should have used makeup instead.

RIP Seattle SuperSonics - 1967–2008
-
Nuke
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:26 am
- Location: Lurking at the end of the starfields!!
- Contact:
One boat needed to be blown up, and you know the one I'm talking about. Preferably by themself, for the added dark humor points that Mr. J is so famous for.
Trek trough the Galaxy on silver wings and play football online.
Hey, I almost cried during that spurprise happening, maybe cause they tried really hard to make you feel like a racist.
MegaShock! | @ YouTube | Latest Update: Metal Slug No Up Lever No Miss
QFTNuke wrote:One boat needed to be blown up, and you know the one I'm talking about. Preferably by themself, for the added dark humor points that Mr. J is so famous for.
seriously....i was watching the movie and that was the first thing that popped into my mind....each ship has the detonator for there own ship....and the dumb civilians is gonna get blowed up.....YAY!!!
dont really see it as a bad thing that i was wrong....i thought one thing and the film took me for a loop...i like that kind of thing....i hate predictable movies
-
GaijinPunch
- Posts: 15853
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:22 pm
- Location: San Fransicso
It was a tie between Raising Arizona and Fargo until recently (based on number of times I've watched, Raizing Arizona by a mile). Ask me in a year, but I think No Country has edged into the lead. Chigur is one of the best villains to hit the big screen... and I grew up in Texas in the 80's, so I have a soft spot.Miller's Crossing, right?
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
No, no, I agreed with you and the small text just confirmed it, that's allJoshF wrote:Nope. Being overrated has nothing to do with actual quality. Those movies just tend to be flagrantly overrated because pseudo-intellectuals like to cut and paste from the critical orthodoxy .Was laughing before I read the fine print, which is overkill imo
I'm a terrible person and haven't seen any of the ones mentioned.GaijinPunch wrote:It was a tie between Raising Arizona and Fargo until recently (based on number of times I've watched, Raizing Arizona by a mile). Ask me in a year, but I think No Country has edged into the lead. Chigur is one of the best villains to hit the big screen... and I grew up in Texas in the 80's, so I have a soft spot.

-
GaijinPunch
- Posts: 15853
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:22 pm
- Location: San Fransicso
Interesting how you rip my list (which i spent a good 20 seconds on) and haven't posted anything about your own movie choices.GaijinPunch wrote: Please name one of your classics. If your list is as bad as nlne83's, I'm never locating another game for you again.

...besides responding to coen brother movies.
There is no reason to continue to reply to this thread. I'll stop now. lol The only thing we're gonna get out of this is people telling each other how shitty their taste in movies is. I'm gonna go back to shmup love etc..which is why I come here in the first place.
Didn't say that Ed. I was asked for a classic, I gave one.Ed Oscuro wrote:
BONUS: here's skykid complaining about the dialogue
and then putting up Dr. Strangelove as one of the best movies of all time.
Totally missing your point though - are you actually saying that Strangelove can't hold a candle to the dialogue of the new Batman movie?
For your integrity, I hope not.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Assuming it is still possible to talk about Batman here; even though I've only seen the movie once (less times than the average American), having time to ruminate over the film has been helpful. What I'm most amazed by is the huge demographic this film is appealing to. You make a heavy, depressing film and can guarantee that the film will only appeal to a certain demographic is really going to enjoy the film. But the numbers suggest that a lot of people are seeing the film they want in batman; that is, the directors have cleverly produced a film that for a lot of people is just a big summer action film--and a good one at that. But clearly for those who want to see all the other messages in this film, those are there too.
For the naysayers of this film, I certainly agree this isn't the greatest film in movie history. I don't even know if I'd buy the DVD of it, but questioning whether it is a good film seems silly. This is a big, meaty film with a lot of thought behind it; that's not something we see running off the hollywood assembly line everyday, and I am really pleased to see the film receiving the attention it is.
For the naysayers of this film, I certainly agree this isn't the greatest film in movie history. I don't even know if I'd buy the DVD of it, but questioning whether it is a good film seems silly. This is a big, meaty film with a lot of thought behind it; that's not something we see running off the hollywood assembly line everyday, and I am really pleased to see the film receiving the attention it is.
SHMUP sale page.Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
Couldn't have said it better myself (It's true, I can't). Unless I was sitting next to a sweaty pig in the theatre I can't imagine how anyone could feel like it was a waste of time after they left the theatre.CMoon wrote:Assuming it is still possible to talk about Batman here; even though I've only seen the movie once (less times than the average American), having time to ruminate over the film has been helpful. What I'm most amazed by is the huge demographic this film is appealing to. You make a heavy, depressing film and can guarantee that the film will only appeal to a certain demographic is really going to enjoy the film. But the numbers suggest that a lot of people are seeing the film they want in batman; that is, the directors have cleverly produced a film that for a lot of people is just a big summer action film--and a good one at that. But clearly for those who want to see all the other messages in this film, those are there too.
For the naysayers of this film, I certainly agree this isn't the greatest film in movie history. I don't even know if I'd buy the DVD of it, but questioning whether it is a good film seems silly. This is a big, meaty film with a lot of thought behind it; that's not something we see running off the hollywood assembly line everyday, and I am really pleased to see the film receiving the attention it is.
I'd still like to motivate to let the naysayers express their beliefs, but naming your classics won't cut it. Clearly state what's wrong with movie compared to the usual holywood flicks.
That they do, especially when extra effort is required to decipher what they mean.Ed Oscuro wrote:Read the rest of the post to find out exactly what I meant!
Words hold a strange power.
I'd rather not get dragged through the rigmaroll of why I think the film is grossly overrated - but there are many reasons, some of which have already been cited in this thread.
What's most interesting is moviegoers that find utter baloney like the Last Samurai entertaining still pick out the correct faults with the Dark Knight. It's clear that as disposable popcorn fiction, the Dark Knight is as messy a film for a fair portion of its target audience as it is for the critics.
Were it not put on such a pedestal, it wouldn't bother me too much. Still, I expect more from a 3 hour Batman film, and this Nolan effort failed to engage or even achieve the consistency of the Tim Burton efforts.
But when audiences have been treated to half-assed crap for the better part of nearly ten years, who's counting?
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Tim Burton bragged about never reading a Batman comic, and it showed.
MegaShock! | @ YouTube | Latest Update: Metal Slug No Up Lever No Miss
I thought Tim Burton did read Killing Joke. Something about him being dyslexic and not knowing which order to read the panels.
This thread seems to have run it's course... it's a pretty good movie for Hollywood, which Batman fans really enjoy because it stands up to the comics. It's overhyped, and there are always people like those on IMDB who would give it 1 star just to bring down the average rating as much as possible. It is of no consequence.
This thread seems to have run it's course... it's a pretty good movie for Hollywood, which Batman fans really enjoy because it stands up to the comics. It's overhyped, and there are always people like those on IMDB who would give it 1 star just to bring down the average rating as much as possible. It is of no consequence.
That is Galactic Dancing
-
GaijinPunch
- Posts: 15853
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 11:22 pm
- Location: San Fransicso
I guess I'm an optimist then - it's an improvement over what we've had, certainly.Skykid wrote:But when audiences have been treated to half-assed crap for the better part of nearly ten years, who's counting?
But that's my pessimistic note - I agree that most superhero films are probably garbage (I only can really recall Spider-Man from '01; haven't gone to see any others; the last superhero flick I saw before that was probably Batskin & Robbin)
But he still achieved a consistency in film making not exhibited in the Dark Knight.JoshF wrote:Tim Burton bragged about never reading a Batman comic, and it showed.
And the shooting of Wayne's parents was handled so much more credibly in the original due to it being darker and more violent.
The better director wins out, regardless of his knowledge of the subject matter.
I know what you mean - I quite liked the first two Spiderman films, although I thought the portrayal of the character was a bit off the beaten path (where were all spidey's one liners!).I guess I'm an optimist then - it's an improvement over what we've had, certainly.
I'd agree most superhero movies in between are pretty duff: Daredevil, Elektra, The incredible Hulk etc.
But the damn holes man, why all the damn HOLES! Doesn't Batman deserve to be written better?

Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
I don't know what that means. You mean how he plugged Prince twice?But he still achieved a consistency in film making not exhibited in the Dark Knight.
MegaShock! | @ YouTube | Latest Update: Metal Slug No Up Lever No Miss
Oh well.JoshF wrote:I don't know what that means.But he still achieved a consistency in film making not exhibited in the Dark Knight.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
-
Nuke
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:26 am
- Location: Lurking at the end of the starfields!!
- Contact:
Trek trough the Galaxy on silver wings and play football online.
Ah, it was so obvious. TRUST.
MegaShock! | @ YouTube | Latest Update: Metal Slug No Up Lever No Miss
lolJoshF wrote: TRUST.

Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts