Sega/Treasure to dev "Gunstar Super Heroes."

A place where you can chat about anything that isn't to do with games!
User avatar
Dylan1CC
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:23 am

Sega/Treasure to dev "Gunstar Super Heroes."

Post by Dylan1CC »

Big thanks to J2D for finding this on Gamefront.de:

Babelfish translation:
Sega develops Gunstar super Heroes

18.03.05 - Sega works on the Actionspiel Gunstar Super Heroes. That comes out from an appropriate trademark protection entry bem American patent office of 10.03.05. Whether the development is taken over as with the mega drive Gunstar Heroes (1993) also by Treasure, is unclear. Likewise still no platform is well-known. Release: TBA.
This is good news for obvious reasons but the potential for both greatness and disappointment are substantial. But Treasure wouldn't make a sequel/followup unless they thought they had a winning new game mechanic. As long as they keep it a 2D platformer (don't see why they wouldn't, not like they made Ikaruga an on rails 3D game), I'm very sure they will deliver a very memorable and well designed game. This is Treasure after all. As long as people don't expect an expansion pack to the Genny cart we can expect a great actioner.

It will be interesting to see how different the character and art is from the first (since Ikaruga featured very different S&P'esque characters and much darker art than Radiant)
Last edited by Dylan1CC on Sat Mar 19, 2005 12:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kiken
Posts: 3983
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Sega/Treasure to dev "Gunstar Super Heroes."

Post by Kiken »

Dylan1CC wrote: It will be interesting to see how different the character and art is from the first (since Ikaruga featured very different S&P'esque characters and much darker art than Radiant)
That's because Yasushi Suzuki did the artwork and character designs for both S&P and Ikaruga.
User avatar
Dylan1CC
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:23 am

Re: Sega/Treasure to dev "Gunstar Super Heroes."

Post by Dylan1CC »

Kiken wrote:
Dylan1CC wrote: It will be interesting to see how different the character and art is from the first (since Ikaruga featured very different S&P'esque characters and much darker art than Radiant)
That's because Yasushi Suzuki did the artwork and character designs for both S&P and Ikaruga.
Yeah I know. I guess I should have phrased it "It will be interesting if they use S&P's artist." :P
User avatar
UnscathedFlyingObject
Posts: 3636
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:59 am
Location: Uncanny Valley
Contact:

Post by UnscathedFlyingObject »

I smell a GBA release, and if Guardian Heroes is any indication. There is plenty of room for disappointment, but a glimmer of light at the end of the room (?) (Astro Boy GBA was cool).
"Sooo, what was it that you consider a 'good salary' for a man to make?"
"They should at least make 100K to have a good life"
...
User avatar
E. Randy Dupre
Posts: 954
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 2:26 pm

Re: Sega/Treasure to dev "Gunstar Super Heroes."

Post by E. Randy Dupre »

Dylan1CC wrote:This is Treasure after all.
That's not what that quote says, as far as I can see. Whether Treasure are involved or not is "unclear."
User avatar
Ganelon
Posts: 4413
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 1:43 am

Post by Ganelon »

Wow, looks like Sega is getting nostalgic...
User avatar
dementia
Posts: 201
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:37 am

Post by dementia »

Funny. Just this morning I was wondering if there would ever be a follow-up to GH.

I'm horrified beyond belief.
Last edited by dementia on Sat Mar 19, 2005 3:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Shatterhand
Posts: 4102
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:01 am
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Contact:

Post by Shatterhand »

Yes, there's nothing saying that Treasure is involved at all on this.

Gunstar Heroes is one my fav games ever..
User avatar
Dylan1CC
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:23 am

Re: Sega/Treasure to dev "Gunstar Super Heroes."

Post by Dylan1CC »

E. Randy Dupre wrote:
Dylan1CC wrote:This is Treasure after all.
That's not what that quote says, as far as I can see. Whether Treasure are involved or not is "unclear."
Very true. My bad on jumping the gun a bit. Hmmmm. Does Sega maybe in some way have part of the rights to Gunstar? Speaking on the other end of jumping the gun...
dementia wrote:Funny. Just this morning I was wondering if there would ever be a follow-up to GH.

I'm horrified beyond belief.
Aw, c'mon. Have a little more faith. ;)
User avatar
Andi
Posts: 1425
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:35 am
Location: Chi-town, IL

Post by Andi »

UnscathedFlyingObject wrote:I smell a GBA release, and if Guardian Heroes is any indication. There is plenty of room for disappointment,
Took the words right out of my mouth. After playing that game, I became Treasure's #1 anti-fan.
User avatar
BrianC
Posts: 9062
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:33 am
Location: MD

Post by BrianC »

Andi wrote:
UnscathedFlyingObject wrote:I smell a GBA release, and if Guardian Heroes is any indication. There is plenty of room for disappointment,
Took the words right out of my mouth. After playing that game, I became Treasure's #1 anti-fan.
Is the game really that bad? Aside from the pro reviews, I heard that the game isn't that bad. I also heard that it's not emulated perfectly and slows down a lot more on roms. What exactly did you find wrong with the game?
User avatar
Super Mega C
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 2:26 am
Location: TN

Post by Super Mega C »

^^It is that bad, and trust me I'm notorious for liking bad games especially bea'tem ups.
Button masher extrordinaire
"and on the eighth day, he stopped resting"
User avatar
Andi
Posts: 1425
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:35 am
Location: Chi-town, IL

Post by Andi »

BrianC wrote:Is the game really that bad? Aside from the pro reviews, I heard that the game isn't that bad. I also heard that it's not emulated perfectly and slows down a lot more on roms. What exactly did you find wrong with the game?
It feels rushed, unpolished, uninspired, and empty. The entire system is based upon blocking and counter-attacking instead of jumping in a crowd of guys and pummeling them (like a you should do in a scrolling fighter kind of game). And he story segments are longer and even less relevant than the first Guardian Heroes.

It's so sad, because the first Guardian Heroes is what made me love Treasure, and the second is what destroyed that love.
User avatar
LoneSage
Posts: 1070
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:28 am
Location: Harman's Room

Post by LoneSage »

Bah. Bah I say to thee, Andrew! We all know you hate it cos you can't get past the fourth level.


I like Advance Guardian Heroes; sure, it was one of the biggest disappointments to me of 2004 (my hype for it escalated to godly proportions), but it's still a good game. Everyone should at least check it out and beat it.
User avatar
Andi
Posts: 1425
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:35 am
Location: Chi-town, IL

Post by Andi »

LoneSage wrote:Bah. Bah I say to thee, Andrew! We all know you hate it cos you can't get past the fourth level.
Heh, I was wondering when you were going to chime in and disagree with me.

By the way, I changed my mind about Atomic Runner. It's amazing and later levels are fabulous.
User avatar
Nemo
Posts: 898
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 11:06 pm
Location: American Ninja

Post by Nemo »

Advance Guardian Heroes is a fun game though not great. Certainly trumps the sluggish gameplay plagued and slowdown infested original. Once you get the hang of the counter apsect, the game is a breeze and a bit deeper than people give it credit for.
User avatar
LoneSage
Posts: 1070
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:28 am
Location: Harman's Room

Post by LoneSage »

Andi wrote: By the way, I changed my mind about Atomic Runner. It's amazing and later levels are fabulous.
Then you are forgiven.

Oh, and about Gunstar Heroes, guys...

Contra: Hard Corps > Gunstar Heroes

You all know it's true, deep down inside :o
User avatar
Andi
Posts: 1425
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:35 am
Location: Chi-town, IL

Post by Andi »

LoneSage wrote:Contra: Hard Corps > Gunstar Heroes

You all know it's true, deep down inside :o
I don't know about that, but it is certainly a better value. I'm pretty sure that Gunstar Heroes doesn't contain $40 worth of fun, but I know that Contra: Hard Corps contains at least $6 worth.
User avatar
Davey
Posts: 1605
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Toledo, OH

Post by Davey »

Andi wrote:
LoneSage wrote:Contra: Hard Corps > Gunstar Heroes

You all know it's true, deep down inside :o
I don't know about that, but it is certainly a better value. I'm pretty sure that Gunstar Heroes doesn't contain $40 worth of fun, but I know that Contra: Hard Corps contains at least $6 worth.
$40? Damn, I paid $10 for it, and I later saw it elsewhere at a couple places for about the same price. That was a few years ago, though.

And Gunstar Heroes is totally awesome, whereas Contra Hard Corps is just pretty awesome.

This is an interesting move by Treasure. Every time Treasure releases a game there's always the "yeah, but when are we going to get Gunstar Heroes 2, dammit!" response. The hype has been building up years before the game was even announced, and I don't think any game can live up to that kind of ridiculous standard.
User avatar
Andi
Posts: 1425
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:35 am
Location: Chi-town, IL

Post by Andi »

Davey wrote:$40? Damn, I paid $10 for it, and I later saw it elsewhere at a couple places for about the same price. That was a few years ago, though.
My bad. More like $20 to $30. My point still stands though.
User avatar
jp
Posts: 3243
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:11 am
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Post by jp »

Ladies and gentlemen, may I turn you attention to Exhibit A:
http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php3?d ... 3-11&res=l



And thats all that really needs to be said about that.
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE!!!!!!
User avatar
Stormwatch
Posts: 2327
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 1:04 am
Location: Brazil
Contact:

Post by Stormwatch »

I'd rather see exact ports of Gunstar Heroes and Alien Soldier.
Image
User avatar
Thunder Force
Posts: 1773
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:21 am
Location: research and development facility for Vasteel Technology.

Post by Thunder Force »

Allegedly leaked images of Gunstar Super Heroes for the Sony PSP:

http://www.tok2.com/home/hirano6862/ganstar.htm

Wonder how long before they're pulled offline... :P

EDIT: probably fakes
Last edited by Thunder Force on Sun Mar 27, 2005 4:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
shadowstar
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:36 am

Post by shadowstar »

Dang, those look awesome.
dok_industrial
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:09 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Post by dok_industrial »

Thunder Force wrote:Allegedly leaked images of Gunstar Super Heroes for the Sony PSP:

http://www.tok2.com/home/hirano6862/ganstar.htm

Wonder how long before they're pulled offline... :P
damn you, sony. put this out, and chances are REAL good you're gonna end up with even more of my money.
User avatar
Nuke
Posts: 1439
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:26 am
Location: Lurking at the end of the starfields!!
Contact:

Post by Nuke »

Awww, damn'. I was rather hoping I did'nt have to buy a PSP...... :(
Trek trough the Galaxy on silver wings and play football online.
Valgar
Posts: 786
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Holy Diver
Contact:

Post by Valgar »

Stormwatch wrote:I'd rather see exact ports of Gunstar Heroes and Alien Soldier.
Why? That would be a complete waste of time. Anyone can go get a MD and play the old titles. Treasure should, and DOES, spend their time making new games designed around the hardware it is intended for.

Regarding that image, I do not believe it is real. The icon in the upper left is just a rip of Red from the Gunstar Heroes JP cover.
User avatar
Ganelon
Posts: 4413
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 1:43 am

Post by Ganelon »

Err, the sprites are all the same in those pictures. Can't imagine Treasure would just leave them that way on the PSP...
User avatar
Thunder Force
Posts: 1773
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:21 am
Location: research and development facility for Vasteel Technology.

Post by Thunder Force »

Good points about the reused art, etc. In that case they are probably fake, since now that I think about it the PSP is a multimedia system you can display practically any retouched screens on it with little effort.
User avatar
Turrican
Posts: 4728
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:28 am
Location: Landorin
Contact:

Post by Turrican »

I have not played Guardian Heroes games, but that must be clearly a case of bad genre for the GBA hardware. It's not that they couldn't do a good one with enough effort, but it was clearly going to fail expectations since the prequel runs on a Saturn. I wonder why Treasure decided to ruin their no-sequel policy with a so flawed project.

Gunstar Heroes' formula, on the other hand, would shine on portable systems.

I've just finished Astro Boy OF anyway, and I cannot recommend anymore. Truly a work of art. Excellent, gba gaming at its best. And it has the charm of a Dynamite Headdy-esque game. Please buy it, in multiple copies.

About that PA comic... Yeah, lately sega does suck a lot. But it's not a problem: Sega and Treasure have always been closely related, If a Gunstar 2 is really on their mind there's a high chance that Sega would leave the development part to T. I mean, just think how the press would crash them otherwise...
Image
X - P - B
Post Reply