Well, humans build fantastically elaborate discriminatory beliefs by assuming that "they all look alike [=members of a given group], so they are the same [insert here bad opinion the group]". Welcome to "HG101 - Human Groupthinking 101". Nobody dies if kids discriminate against game genres on the interwebs, but the mechanics seem those ones, to me. I do not think that the HG101 has "evil" intentions, but I simply could not resist the somewhat nasty joke.
HG101 works exactly like any other publication that relies on freelancers (at least they used to, I haven't looked at it in awhile), in that somewhat submits an article about a game(s), if the editor (Kurt? I e-talked to him a million years ago) finds it well-written and informative, they publish it (AND pay you for it. Which is something I can not say about most niche publications it's size). Meaning, if an article is run that you don't like, don't agree with, or just think is wrong for whatever reason, there was something you could have done about it, you just didn't. Like MJ before, start with the man in the mirror.
tl;dr Your incontestably correct opinion could have been up there for future generations to study and admire, AND you could have been paid for it. All you needed to do was write it. You didn't, so it isn't. Someone else got the gig, the money, and the inside track to future generations.