Yellow, white, orange, gray and lots of red. Must be $20 million worth there at least. I guess it puts Zak's PCB collection to shame

No, it doesn't, I thought you found someone with all pcb's ever releasedneorichieb1971 wrote:I guess it puts Zak's PCB collection to shame
Ceph wrote:Why, these are just cars. All you can do is clean them, fix them and drive them (at 65mph in the US of A, wahaha). So what.
Maybe, maybe not. Granted, I've only owned econoboxes, but I've never considered driving even remotely fun. More of a burden, really. Boring at best, stressful at worst. If it weren't for the crappy weather and all the other cars on the road, I'd much rather ride a bicycle everywhere. But I'm sure a lot of people would consider that boring... doesn't mean they never owned a nice bike, though.bloodflowers wrote:Seriously - the 'drive at 65' thing is a line you can only use if you've never driven a fun car.
I don't know. I have an entry-level job, and yet I still I save over half my net income because there aren't many things out there I want to buy. On the other hand, if I won enough money to retire today, my mind would probably change quickly... but even then it would be the freedom I would value, not the stuff I could buy.bloodflowers wrote:I wish I had that much money. Money most certainly can buy happiness, and people who disagree are just trying to make themselves feel better.
I know you are speaking the truth. But I am sorry, I have to disagree. Since there is no point making myself feel worser, for I am a poor cat.bloodflowers wrote:I wish I had that much money. Money most certainly can buy happiness, and people who disagree are just trying to make themselves feel better.
LOLSAM wrote:I know you are speaking the truth. But I am sorry, I have to disagree. Since there is no point making myself feel worse, for I am a poor cat.bloodflowers wrote:I wish I had that much money. Money most certainly can buy happiness, and people who disagree are just trying to make themselves feel better.![]()
All the data I've seen shows otherwise. One's life satisfaction will typically increase if one is initially in poverty and gets out of it. But studies strongly suggest that people above a certain threshold (approx. the poverty line) who go on to acquire a lot more money-- such people have a temporary high (not more than six months, say), but in the long run their life satisfaction is no greater than before they got the increase in funds. You might think: well, I'm different; my life would definitely be more satisfying. And perhaps you're right. But you would be an exceptional case, if that's true about you.bloodflowers wrote:Money most certainly can buy happiness, and people who disagree are just trying to make themselves feel better.
that´s pretty much self-explanatory once you realize how perception of feeling works: the only thing you really notice is a difference from the previous state. That´s because the system of hormones responsible for sensations and feelings is a self-stabilizing, self-regulating "mechanism" elevating all changes so they are perceived as normal after some time. And it works this way because that´s the most effective way to regulate human behaviour in a way that makes us fit for survival. Human beings are what they are by their ability to adapt to changes, and the way emotions work is an important foundation for this ability.All the data I've seen shows otherwise. One's life satisfaction will typically increase if one is initially in poverty and gets out of it. But studies strongly suggest that people above a certain threshold (approx. the poverty line) who go on to acquire a lot more money-- such people have a temporary high (not more than six months, say), but in the long run their life satisfaction is no greater than before they got the increase in funds. You might think: well, I'm different; my life would definitely be more satisfying. And perhaps you're right. But you would be an exceptional case, if that's true about you.
Yeah, I remember hearing that most lottery winners are actually less happy a year or so after they win than before they won (but in some cases that had to do with them overspending and depleting their winnings prematurely).professor ganson wrote:But studies strongly suggest that people above a certain threshold (approx. the poverty line) who go on to acquire a lot more money-- such people have a temporary high (not more than six months, say), but in the long run their life satisfaction is no greater than before they got the increase in funds.
65? Which America? My average speed on the way to work is 75-100. (except for a few spots and known cop spots)Ceph wrote:Why, these are just cars. All you can do is clean them, fix them and drive them (at 65mph in the US of A, wahaha). So what.
The important thing about money=happiness is that lack of money=misery. The more money you have, the less you have to fear for the future. I have a job, I work in IT where traditionally careers are dashed in an instant. This is a constant source of worry for me. Rich people don't have that pressure, they don't need to worry about where the rent will come from. Money = freedom, and free people are always more content.raiden wrote:that´s pretty much self-explanatory once you realize how perception of feeling works: the only thing you really notice is a difference from the previous state. That´s because the system of hormones responsible for sensations and feelings is a self-stabilizing, self-regulating "mechanism" elevating all changes so they are perceived as normal after some time. And it works this way because that´s the most effective way to regulate human behaviour in a way that makes us fit for survival. Human beings are what they are by their ability to adapt to changes, and the way emotions work is an important foundation for this ability.
Well they didn't make any Landcruisers (I'm talking about the real utility vehicles, not some poofy luxury truck from last year so leave out all that LX bullshit please) in the USA either, but somehow I have one. Magic?MSZ wrote:Did they make any Land Cruiser/LX450/LX470 in UK, Germany and Italy?PaCrappa wrote:Not one single 60s, 70s or 80s Toyota Landcruiser. Guy's a pussy.
Pa
No wonder why he doesn't have any.
Yeah, it does seem like wealthy people are insulated from a number of kinds of bad things. They too are subject to bad luck, but there are surely fewer things to worry about overall. At the same time, if you are the sort to worry or be depressed, I'm not sure money is all that helpful. You can sedate yourself with expensive drugs, but in the long run that presumably won't do a lot for your sense of well-being. And then if you're not the sort of person to worry about things much, having enough money to get by will probably keep you happy. One thing is clear, though: poverty generally has a negative impact on happiness, and the real threat of poverty is likely to have a negative impact as well.Marc wrote:Now that, sir, is the truth. And one I am currently feeling the sharp pointy end of.bloodflowers wrote: The important thing about money=happiness is that lack of money=misery. The more money you have, the less you have to fear for the future.
Not to make light of the situation, but this is a prime example of what I meant. If the results had been bad, you'd most certainly be upset either way, but the rich person doesn't have to additionally worry about remortaging their house to pay for medical bills. Money is insulation, money is safety, and money most certainly means you can buy a big shiny red Ferrari if driving them makes you happy.professor ganson wrote:Today I'm relatively happy. Yesterday I was genuinely worried that my daughter might have cancer, but good results came back this morning. I have a very real sense of how much happiness is subject to chance/luck.
Rich people don´t have to worry about getting money, but about losing it. Rich people aren´t used to get by with a little, so they are more vulnerable in situations like being stranded on an island, out of reach of all their possessions. Moreover, you usually don´t get rich without being obsessed with maximizing your money, but being obsessed != freedom. It´s like saying being in love equals happiness, that may be true, but once you lose that state, you´re even unhappier than before falling in love, because you´ve grown accustomed to the state of being in love.The important thing about money=happiness is that lack of money=misery. The more money you have, the less you have to fear for the future. I have a job, I work in IT where traditionally careers are dashed in an instant. This is a constant source of worry for me. Rich people don't have that pressure, they don't need to worry about where the rent will come from. Money = freedom, and free people are always more content.
Ah yes, the "need for speed" at the racetrack -- this is the recipe for future superstars of motorsports racing...get bitten by the competitive racing "bug" when your kids are young and there's no known cure for it...except to win and win "Big". Who knows, perhaps your kid will be the next Jeff Gordon or Danica Patrick. ^_~Vexorg wrote:Or you can take 'em to the track and drive 'em like you stole 'em...Ceph wrote:Why, these are just cars. All you can do is clean them, fix them and drive them (at 65mph in the US of A, wahaha). So what.
Well the LX is still named as Land Cruiser in Japan, like it or not.PaCrappa wrote:Well they didn't make any Landcruisers (I'm talking about the real utility vehicles, not some poofy luxury truck from last year so leave out all that LX bullshit please) in the USA either, but somehow I have one. Magic?MSZ wrote:Did they make any Land Cruiser/LX450/LX470 in UK, Germany and Italy?PaCrappa wrote:Not one single 60s, 70s or 80s Toyota Landcruiser. Guy's a pussy.
Pa
No wonder why he doesn't have any.
Pa
One of my friends had an Elise, now he's upgraded to an Exige. It gets a lot of looks and of course is great for trackdays.man i wish i had an elise