Ehhhh... it's okay. RE4 was a game I enjoyed the first time thru (enough to even play Assignment Ada) but I could never bring myself to play it again once I was done. The gameplay was solid, I'll give it that, but the writing had issues even compared to other RE games--just for example: killing off Luis Sera just so Ada Wong could take his place, and haphazardly explaining that Luis was a "scientist." That's so clearly a last-minute script revision that I wouldn't be surprised to see them admit it in a couple of years.Skykid wrote:if you don't like RE4, you don't like video games. it's a masterpiece.
(I liked Luis Sera, too...)
The real problem was the level design. The interesting setpieces were few and far between, and you wound up having what felt like the exact same battle too many times. Horde of dudes and a chainsaw guy may have been a major "what the shit!" moment in the first five minutes of the game, but when you see that same basic situation repeat itself something like ten times, and each time you solve it using the same basic strategy (IE wait for them to get close, shotgun them in the head, kick the guys who grab their face, back up, repeat)... it gets tedious.
To be fair, I played it after having come from an intense Devil May Cry (original PS2 game) session, and everything looks worse after a round of DMC.
(To be even more fair... RE4 was tons better than RE Zero, which I consider the worst game in the series. Yes, even worse than Survivor).