Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that bad?

This is the main shmups forum. Chat about shmups in here - keep it on-topic please!
Post Reply
MrOldSchoolCool
Posts: 395
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:12 pm

Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that bad?

Post by MrOldSchoolCool »

On RacketBoy, he says that the PS1 version is a lot better due to slowdown on the Saturn version. I've watched videos of the Saturn version and haven't noticed any.
alamone
Posts: 741
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:32 pm

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by alamone »

Slowdown is really bad on the boat stage.
Just buy the PCB, it's so cheap.
User avatar
Domino
Posts: 1346
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by Domino »

Saturn port sucks. Good bit of animation frame cuts + terrible slowdown. PS1 has less slowdown but still have plenty of animation frame cuts. Play it on MAME.
User avatar
Kiken
Posts: 3983
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by Kiken »

The main problem with the Saturn port is the grievous slowdown during the boat flotilla stage as well as the final boss (when playing in tate). When playing in either yoko mode I believe that the two ports operate fairly close.. although Original Mode 1 features different bullet patterns and the rank progresses at a different rate (in comparison to the original arcade game). It's not a bad port, but the JP PS1 version is closer in accuracy and goes for about the same price. I think the biggest issue with the PS2 Strikers collection is that it's forced 480i.

When it comes to Strikers 1945 though, the Saturn version is fairly close to the PCB when played in tate.
User avatar
Obiwanshinobi
Posts: 7470
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:14 am

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by Obiwanshinobi »

On MAME I&II were laggy last time I tried even with sprite buffer hacked out, as was Sengoku Ace. Since the latter was pretty playable on PS2, I suppose Strikers 1945 I&II are just as good there. 480i Sengoku Ace was easier on the eye than some other upscaled games I could mention.
Wasn't a problem with I and/or II on PS2 that the game(s) do(es)n't show scoreboards?
The rear gate is closed down
The way out is cut off

Image
User avatar
BIL
Posts: 20289
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: COLONY

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by BIL »

Obiwanshinobi wrote:On MAME I&II were laggy last time I tried even with sprite buffer hacked out, as was Sengoku Ace. Since the latter was pretty playable on PS2, I suppose Strikers 1945 I&II are just as good there.
They're not. While Sengoku Ace is a direct port/emulation of the PCB, I&II are for some reason the existing home ports slapped onto PS2. Much better to go with Saturn for I and PS1 for II, if you want home versions.
User avatar
Fudoh
Posts: 13040
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:29 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by Fudoh »

They're not. While Sengoku Ace is a direct port/emulation of the PCB, I&II are for some reason the existing home ports slapped onto PS2.
are you sure about this ? I haven't done any deep comparisons on them, but the PS2 versions are running in 480i while the PS1 versions are running in 240p, so I always assumed they used the same emulator they used on the other Psikyo packs.
User avatar
BIL
Posts: 20289
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: COLONY

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by BIL »

Yes - at least for II, where every frame of animation missing from the PS1 port is also absent in the PS2 version. It's only particularly obvious on bosses. Easy comparison is Cross Sinker (st6) during his transformation, which is hugely cut down in the home ports, but the pistons on Goliath (trainyard)'s initial form are another giveaway. PS1 vs PS2 vs MAME
User avatar
BrianC
Posts: 9056
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:33 am
Location: MD

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by BrianC »

yikes. I guess I'll try to find the JP Strikers 1945 II PS1 for my Strikers 1945 II fix. I already have the Saturn port of the first game. What is it with companies porting PS1 games to PS2 with no 240p and, in some cases (MM Anniversary Collection, I'm looking at you), input lag?
User avatar
BIL
Posts: 20289
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: COLONY

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by BIL »

Should be an easy find if you're okay with reprints, 1945 II PS1 got a Superlite re-release that goes for cheap even brand new.
User avatar
Ed Oscuro
Posts: 18654
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: uoıʇɐɹnƃıɟuoɔ ɯǝʇsʎs

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by Ed Oscuro »

BIL wrote:I&II are for some reason the existing home ports
Can I have one guess why? I think one guess is all I need to get this one.
User avatar
BIL
Posts: 20289
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: COLONY

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by BIL »

You know it. :oops: ;__;

To paraphrase Rowan Atkinson, sometimes an STG fan's life is finger-lickin' good (LIKE WHEN THERE'S NO EXISTING CONSOLE PORT TO CASH IN ON -> THANKS FOR PS2 DRAGON BLAZE). Other times it's, well, it's just ass-wipin' bad.
User avatar
Ed Oscuro
Posts: 18654
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: uoıʇɐɹnƃıɟuoɔ ɯǝʇsʎs

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by Ed Oscuro »

Why can't game developers have the same ethical sense as this guy has?
User avatar
stuminator
Posts: 337
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:22 pm
Location: Kansas, USA

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by stuminator »

alamone wrote:Slowdown is really bad on the boat stage.
Just buy the PCB, it's so cheap.
Yeah, the slowdown on the boat stage really is awful.

And, maybe its just me, but I found dodging some of the patterns to be lot harder in the Saturn port, pretty much anything with small gaps in the patterns, Cross Sinkers' "flower petal" attack, the final bosses second & third forms, Syumi's second form opening attack.
User avatar
BIL
Posts: 20289
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: COLONY

Re: Is the Saturn version of Strikers 1945 II really that ba

Post by BIL »

stuminator wrote:And, maybe its just me, but I found dodging some of the patterns to be lot harder in the Saturn port, pretty much anything with small gaps in the patterns, Cross Sinkers' "flower petal" attack, the final bosses second & third forms, Syumi's second form opening attack.
I've noticed the PS1's hitboxes seem a bit bigger too, to the point I go around patterns I can usually squeeze through in MAME. It's still possible to fly straight between the double parallel shots fired by the vertically-descending popcorns early in Syumi's stage, so it can't be too drastic an increase, but I do notice it. According to raiden the hitbox actually does vary between the SS, PS1 and PCB versions.
raiden wrote:Strikers 1945 II runs faster on PCB than on PSone. The PSone version has slowdowns, not as many as the Saturn version, but still some, especially in stages 6-8. It´s still an excellent port, but it´s not superior to the Saturn version in every way, as the Saturn version has better sound. Another thing that´s different is the hitzone. Saturn has the largest, PSone is noticeably smaller, PCB is just a tiny bit smaller than PSone. Only looking at tate modes.
Post Reply