
Cameron's Titanic movie sunk by ex-wife. Bravo.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
So did she receive a revenue sack with a dollar sign on it forSkykid wrote:Cameron's Titanic movie sunk by ex-wife. Bravo.
Ha ha, we really do have different taste in movies. Mine's good, yours stinks.jonny5 wrote:hurt locker was way over hyped...
i finally broke down and watched it, and when the credits rolled i was like 'WTF!!??! thats it?'![]()
at least avatar was entertaining....
the hurt locker felt like watching a docu-drama on TLC or A&E
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
I didn't see anything obvious in that respect, and I would have noticed. In fairness, there is no hint at war crimes or illegality - the soldiers in the film are honorable characters. But then not all soldiers act like savages, just some of them.Klatrymadon wrote:I haven't seen this yet, but a friend was telling me he thought it had some dodgy political tendencies (that it ignored the illegality and the war crimes entirely and basically portrayed the US Army as paragons of virtue, etc). Should I ignore this and see it anyway? Er, bearing in mind stuff like that would piss on my chips a bit.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
oh no you di'int.../snapsSkykid wrote:Ha ha, we really do have different taste in movies. Mine's good, yours stinks.jonny5 wrote:hurt locker was way over hyped...
i finally broke down and watched it, and when the credits rolled i was like 'WTF!!??! thats it?'![]()
at least avatar was entertaining....
the hurt locker felt like watching a docu-drama on TLC or A&E
captpain wrote:Basically, the reason people don't like Bakraid is because they are fat and dumb
Ha ha, our movie battle wages on!jonny5 wrote: oh no you di'int.../snaps![]()
I agree with that criticism to some degree, the characters were movie stereotypes - but the focus of the film was pretty fresh and I liked the nuttiness of the idea. It was directed really well too. Easily her best film since Point Break.Acid King wrote:The Hurt Locker was a good action movie but all the characters were cookie cutter action movie clichés. The premise is good and the action scenes are well done but I don't think it deserves all the fawning praise that people are dumping on it.
Don't worry man, neither did anyone else. I think it's the lowest earning movie ever to win best picture - nobody went to see it.brentsg wrote:
So I had NO clue what Hurt Locker was.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Downloaded it, but that's because there were are virtually no theaters (afaik) in Japan showing it.Skykid wrote: Don't worry man, neither did anyone else. I think it's the lowest earning movie ever to win best picture - nobody went to see it.
I agree, the concept behind it was what made me want to see it and it didn't let me down in the action department but the characters and their lack of development and the unreality of some of their actions I think hurts it overall. When I read critics say that it's a "penetrating study of heroism" or that people 20 years from now will watch it to learn about what happened to soldiers during the Iraq War I think "These people are fucking insane". It's as though because it's the first good movie about Iraq they have to blow their loads all over it. I enjoyed it for the direction and the action, but I don't think it's in the same league as stuff like Platoon, Full Metal Jacket or Apocalypse Now as far as movies go.Skykid wrote:
I agree with that criticism to some degree, the characters were movie stereotypes - but the focus of the film was pretty fresh and I liked the nuttiness of the idea. It was directed really well too. Easily her best film since Point Break.![]()
captpain wrote:Basically, the reason people don't like Bakraid is because they are fat and dumb
Thirded, Near Dark was cool. She's got some grit for a chick, that's for sure - I can't see her directing a rom-com.RGC wrote:Ooh Near Dark, I like that. Might have to check this one out.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
You don't recognise 'good' when you see it dude. Avatar was fun but no great contribution to cinema.jonny5 wrote: i still dont get what everybody sees in this film....there was nothing particularly great about it....how the hell it beat out avatar for ANY tech awards is beyond me....
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
I thought so...each time a movie is hyped like that, I always get burned. Thanx for the warning.jonny5 wrote:hurt locker was way over hyped...
i finally broke down and watched it, and when the credits rolled i was like 'WTF!!??! thats it?'![]()
at least avatar was entertaining....
the hurt locker felt like watching a docu-drama on TLC or A&E
i didnt say avatar was 'good'...i said it was 'entertaining'....theres a differenceSkykid wrote:You don't recognise 'good' when you see it dude. Avatar was fun but no great contribution to cinema.jonny5 wrote: i still dont get what everybody sees in this film....there was nothing particularly great about it....how the hell it beat out avatar for ANY tech awards is beyond me....
THL is a much better movie than pretty much everything that came out last year, bar Inglorious Basterds, which gets better and better each time I see it.
Damn, Near Dark is one of my all time faves but I had no idea she also directed those other two! Now I definitely have to check out The Hurt Locker, even though I tend to avoid anything that has anything to do with the middle east.Near Dark, Point Break and Strange Days