Too close for comfort? the revival?

This is the main shmups forum. Chat about shmups in here - keep it on-topic please!
Locked
User avatar
DrTrouserPlank
Posts: 1148
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:26 pm

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by DrTrouserPlank »

I'm still waiting for my Nuggets.

Service here is terrible.
To go "full-Plank" - colloquial - To experience disproportionate levels of frustration as a result of resistance to completing a task. Those who go "full-Plank" very rarely recover.
Nasirosuchus
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:56 am

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Nasirosuchus »

BIL wrote:You made a silly comment implying that acknowledging nobody owes you free videogames is some kind of character flaw. I and at least one other guy disagreed. There's little to discuss, really.

And seriously - I don't care about the morality or ethics or what have you of emulation itself. It's just not that important a subject to me. A boring ice-cold ethical potato as opposed to the scalding-hot one some consider it, you know? I do like to watch those people chuck said hot potato back and forth occasionally, though.
Whether a person should be able to play a game for free or whether they should or shouldn't but it after playing a ROM are both moral and ethical arguments and I think we can all agree that morals and ethics are completely subjective. As everyone has already given their point of view on the matter, it's pretty obvious that no one is going to change anyone else's mind on what's morally or ethically right or wrong, and making personal attacks on someone because he or she don't share your views just makes you look like a little kid who can't get his way.

The comment about no one being owed free video games is irrelevant as well as a strawman because no one ever claimed as such.
moozooh
Posts: 3722
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: moscow/russia
Contact:

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by moozooh »

I think BIL is dissing mjclark not because he pirates games and isn't ashamed of it, but rather because of the [moral!] justification he uses for it, which isn't just "I want to play games for free" which is what it boils down to. It's when it becomes "I want to play games for free because I have a reason for it" when it gets stupid.
Image
Matskat wrote:This neighborhood USED to be nice...until that family of emulators moved in across the street....
User avatar
BIL
Posts: 20289
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: COLONY

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by BIL »

Nasirosuchus wrote:Whether a person should be able to play a game for free or whether they should or shouldn't but it after playing a ROM are both moral and ethical arguments and I think we can all agree that morals and ethics are completely subjective. As everyone has already given their point of view on the matter, it's pretty obvious that no one is going to change anyone else's mind on what's morally or ethically right or wrong
Yes, that would be one reason why I've never bothered with this particular "debate." The other, more pressing one being I couldn't care less.
and making personal attacks on someone because he or she don't share your views just makes you look like a little kid who can't get his way.
Tell that to the guy who blew off a contrasting point of view by insinuating it was faulty thinking that'd lead to a career in fast food. Also, do note every so-called "personal attack" was just this same rubbish turned back at him. It was a shitty post, it got called out, please, don't make another torturous meal out of it.

I get now that mj didn't mean any harm, really. Sumez had the better idea. I didn't plan on posting in here again.
The comment about no one being owed free video games is irrelevant as well as a strawman because no one ever claimed as such.
What would you infer from mjclark's response quoted in this post? That people shouldn't feel entitled to emulate?
moozooh wrote:I think BIL is dissing mjclark not because he pirates games and isn't ashamed of it, but rather because of the [moral!] justification he uses for it, which isn't just "I want to play games for free" which is what it boils down to. It's when it becomes "I want to play games for free because I have a reason for it" when it gets stupid.
Honestly, I was only taking a potshot at the idea that not carrying around a sense of entitlement about "free stuff" is bad.
User avatar
Elixir
Posts: 5436
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 3:58 am

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Elixir »

hwl wrote:Holy fuck, the shmup genre would be dead by now if it wasn't for emulation, i.e. pirating.
Just stfu content-mafia supporters plz and return to topic.
The rhythm genre is largely dead and has people pirating material such as HDD dumps. You don't see Konami releasing IIDX, Guitarfreaks, Pop'n Music, Drummania, DDR or Para Para Paradise for PS3/360.

However, you have the shooting genre, with developers creating new and ported material with additional features and sometimes region-free releases for western audiences to access, on a western created console. So how does your implying of, "[people] pirating/playing imitations (the definition of emulation itself) of Japanese material discourages game developers from continuing their involvement within the genre" make any sense?

Justification of piracy is pretty funny to watch, but try to understand that it's the offenders who are trying to do the justifying. It's simply as cut-and-dry as buying a game in order to play a game. You can sugarcoat your piracy by pirating material and proceeding to purchase it afterwards, but this is absurdly illogical considering you're using piracy as a medium of decision.

As for me, I really don't care if you pirate games (and I believe PAL regions are more entitled to do so given the delays and high prices), but don't brag about that shit online, you're just making yourself look bad, as an individual, as a member. It's against the rules of this forum for a reason.
User avatar
yosai
Posts: 274
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:37 pm
Location: London

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by yosai »

Without emulators and MAME this forum would have less members. :roll:
Image
User avatar
mjclark
Banned User
Posts: 1384
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: UK Torquay

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by mjclark »

Image
User avatar
Uzumakijl
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:35 am
Location: México

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Uzumakijl »

Nice song
Image
“Approach your target and attack. Your mission starts now. Are you ready?”
Nasirosuchus
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:56 am

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Nasirosuchus »

BIL wrote:
Tell that to the guy who blew off a contrasting point of view by insinuating it was faulty thinking that'd lead to a career in fast food. Also, do note every so-called "personal attack" was just this same rubbish turned back at him. It was a shitty post, it got called out, please, don't make another torturous meal out of it.
It was a shitty post because he didn't tell them what they wanted to hear? Yeah, you can make arguments about how wrong it is, but those same arguments can indeed be awfully self-righteous. The fact is, no matter which side is taken, most people don't really have any interest in anyone's opinion except for their own, so perhaps he started with the sarcasm because he realized this.

What would you infer from mjclark's response quoted in this post? That people shouldn't feel entitled to emulate?
I would infer that he was alluding to how pointless it is.
moozooh wrote:I think BIL is dissing mjclark not because he pirates games and isn't ashamed of it, but rather because of the [moral!] justification he uses for it, which isn't just "I want to play games for free" which is what it boils down to. It's when it becomes "I want to play games for free because I have a reason for it" when it gets stupid.
Honestly, I was only taking a potshot at the idea that not carrying around a sense of entitlement about "free stuff" is bad.
That's still an argument about morals and ethics which are, again, completely subjective.
Nasirosuchus
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:56 am

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Nasirosuchus »

Elixir wrote: The rhythm genre is largely dead and has people pirating material such as HDD dumps. You don't see Konami releasing IIDX, Guitarfreaks, Pop'n Music, Drummania, DDR or Para Para Paradise for PS3/360.
Your point? Are you saying that those dumps are to blame for the death of the genre? Certainly it has nothing to do with change in tastes and/or that developers saw that there was more profit to be made in other ventures
Justification of piracy is pretty funny to watch, but try to understand that it's the offenders who are trying to do the justifying. It's simply as cut-and-dry as buying a game in order to play a game. You can sugarcoat your piracy by pirating material and proceeding to purchase it afterwards, but this is absurdly illogical considering you're using piracy as a medium of decision.
It can be at times, but many of the arguments against it are pretty damn stupid as well, especially the ones made by those within the industry.
As for me, I really don't care if you pirate games (and I believe PAL regions are more entitled to do so given the delays and high prices), but don't brag about that shit online, you're just making yourself look bad, as an individual, as a member. It's against the rules of this forum for a reason.
There will always be people who look down on some of the things that we do no matter what they may be, and then there will be people who either agree or just don't care. For example, there are plenty of people who would say that you look bad for being so self-righteous about something that really isn't even that important.

The reasons it's against the rules of the forums aren't so much because of whether it's morally right or wrong but moreso because the people in charge want to avoid any potential legal trouble.
User avatar
burgerkingdiamond
Posts: 1571
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:56 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by burgerkingdiamond »

All I know is that I've spent a TON of money on building a shmup collection in the past 2-3 years, and it basically ALL comes down to MAME. If you're in the west how else would you even be expected to hear about the bullet hell genre?
Let's Ass Kick Together!
1CCs : Donpachi (PCB - 1st loop) Dodonpachi (PCB - 1st loop) Battle Bakraid (PCB) Armed Police Batrider (PCB) Mushihimesama Futari 1.5 (360 - Original) Mushihimesama Futari BL (PCB - Original)
User avatar
dunpeal2064
Posts: 1784
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:14 pm
Location: CA

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by dunpeal2064 »

burgerkingdiamond wrote:All I know is that I've spent a TON of money on building a shmup collection in the past 2-3 years, and it basically ALL comes down to MAME. If you're in the west how else would you even be expected to hear about the bullet hell genre?
I lve in the west, own a jap 360, and no version of MAME or any arcade emulator.

I learn plenty about a game via these forums and youtube, and if it sounds fun, I buy it. If I don't like it, I re sell it on these forums for little to no loss.

Then again, I'm not the kind of person that feels entitled to try an entire game with no limits before buying it, because, as a hard-working contributer to society, I like to pay people for their hard work.

Thats just me though. I'm not gonna go get angry that a bunch of people I don't know are getting something for free that I paid good cash for.

All I really want is to geek out and talk video games with some folks
Nasirosuchus
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:56 am

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Nasirosuchus »

dunpeal2064 wrote:
burgerkingdiamond wrote:All I know is that I've spent a TON of money on building a shmup collection in the past 2-3 years, and it basically ALL comes down to MAME. If you're in the west how else would you even be expected to hear about the bullet hell genre?
I lve in the west, own a jap 360, and no version of MAME or any arcade emulator.

I learn plenty about a game via these forums and youtube, and if it sounds fun, I buy it. If I don't like it, I re sell it on these forums for little to no loss.

Then again, I'm not the kind of person that feels entitled to try an entire game with no limits before buying it, because, as a hard-working contributer to society, I like to pay people for their hard work.

Thats just me though. I'm not gonna go get angry that a bunch of people I don't know are getting something for free that I paid good cash for.

All I really want is to geek out and talk video games with some folks
That's fair AND honest.
User avatar
Elixir
Posts: 5436
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 3:58 am

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Elixir »

oh great, a mediator.
User avatar
dunpeal2064
Posts: 1784
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:14 pm
Location: CA

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by dunpeal2064 »

Elixir wrote:oh great, a mediator.
If thats aimed at me, my intention wasn't to mediate. Just to point out how cute you all are with your arguing with no chance of actually fixing anything.

If I'm gonna get my panties in a bunch, it'll be over something that I can actually affect and find really important, like fighting hunger or disease.

As it is, my life isn't so boring that I need to come argue morals on the internet. You all argue all you want, but I try to have fun with my free time, especially when we are talking about video games.

Life is complicated enough as it is.
Last edited by dunpeal2064 on Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Zeron
Posts: 927
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:40 pm

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Zeron »

I find it baffling that this thread has not been locked...
User avatar
DrTrouserPlank
Posts: 1148
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:26 pm

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by DrTrouserPlank »

..and I find it baffling that I still haven't got my Nuggets yet.
To go "full-Plank" - colloquial - To experience disproportionate levels of frustration as a result of resistance to completing a task. Those who go "full-Plank" very rarely recover.
User avatar
dunpeal2064
Posts: 1784
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:14 pm
Location: CA

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by dunpeal2064 »

DrTrouserPlank wrote:..and I find it baffling that I still haven't got my Nuggets yet.
Still never specified the size on that Sprite either.

Its like dealing with a bunch of animals!
User avatar
BIL
Posts: 20289
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: COLONY

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by BIL »

Nasirosuchus wrote:It was a shitty post because he didn't tell them what they wanted to hear?
No, it was a shitty post because it apparently suggested it's a problem to not go through life expecting handouts and free rides.
I would infer that he was alluding to how pointless it is.
LOL. How pointless what is, emulation? Be specific.
BIL wrote:Honestly, I was only taking a potshot at the idea that not carrying around a sense of entitlement about "free stuff" is bad.
That's still an argument about morals and ethics which are, again, completely subjective.
Thank you Mr. Holmes, I am well aware. But in that case I'm more than happy to object because I personally dislike it when people go around expecting handouts. Note that even then my reply will be tastefully limited to something along the lines of "LOL STFU BRO" (see my first post in this thread).
Zeron wrote:I find it baffling that this thread has not been locked...
If you can't take the too close for comfort, stay out of the kitchen.
User avatar
Udderdude
Posts: 6297
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:55 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Udderdude »

Well this thread has gone off the deep end, so here's a picture of a cat being shot at by the rebels on Hoth.

Image
User avatar
DrTrouserPlank
Posts: 1148
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:26 pm

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by DrTrouserPlank »

dunpeal2064 wrote:
DrTrouserPlank wrote:..and I find it baffling that I still haven't got my Nuggets yet.
Still never specified the size on that Sprite either.

Its like dealing with a bunch of animals!
I find the concept of a lemon-lime hybrid drink both ethically and morally objectionable.
To go "full-Plank" - colloquial - To experience disproportionate levels of frustration as a result of resistance to completing a task. Those who go "full-Plank" very rarely recover.
User avatar
Horacechin
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Largo, Florida

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Horacechin »

Udderdude wrote:Well this thread has gone off the deep end, so here's a picture of a cat being shot at by the rebels on Hoth.

Image
WOW that's so awesome.
User avatar
Drum
Banned User
Posts: 2116
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 4:01 pm

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Drum »

dunpeal2064 wrote:
burgerkingdiamond wrote:All I know is that I've spent a TON of money on building a shmup collection in the past 2-3 years, and it basically ALL comes down to MAME. If you're in the west how else would you even be expected to hear about the bullet hell genre?
I lve in the west, own a jap 360, and no version of MAME or any arcade emulator.

I learn plenty about a game via these forums and youtube, and if it sounds fun, I buy it. If I don't like it, I re sell it on these forums for little to no loss.

Then again, I'm not the kind of person that feels entitled to try an entire game with no limits before buying it, because, as a hard-working contributer to society, I like to pay people for their hard work.

Thats just me though. I'm not gonna go get angry that a bunch of people I don't know are getting something for free that I paid good cash for.

All I really want is to geek out and talk video games with some folks
I have paid money for every single game its possible to pay money for via collections and such but I prefer to play all those games via MAME (or console emulation) partly for convenience's sake and partly because the emulation is, almost without exception, better. I play plenty of roms that aren't available to purchase and have no problems doing so. I have discovered so many great games via emulation - virtually all my favourite classics. I love emulation but piracy pisses me off. When the rights to the games aren't held by the original creators I find out what the creators are doing and buy their latest work. I bought Lufia DS because I found out the lead designer of Wibarm, a game I never paid for, worked on it. When I found Owen Rubin (creator of Major Havoc) has a site that said how he could be compensated for his old work by donating to a certain food bank, I donated - but I didn't bother buying Major Havoc from XBLA because Atari isn't even a shell of its former self. When its not clear who the money goes to, I pay for the game just in case.

Nasirosuchus: Please no more.
IGMO - Poorly emulated, never beaten.

Hi-score thread: http://shmups.system11.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=34327
Nasirosuchus
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:56 am

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Nasirosuchus »

BIL wrote:
No, it was a shitty post because it apparently suggested it's a problem to not go through life expecting handouts and free rides.
You're making a hasty generalization.

We're talking about video games here, not a free ride through life. Is it really that big of a deal? Are people dying because of copyright infringement? Are there food shortages because of copyright infringement? Are wars breaking out because of copyright infringement? Is the environment being destroyed because of copyright infringement?
LOL. How pointless what is, emulation? Be specific.
The pointlessness of continuing to bring morality into the argument when it's subjective and obviously won't change anyone's mind.
BIL wrote:Honestly, I was only taking a potshot at the idea that not carrying around a sense of entitlement about "free stuff" is bad.
When mjclark(and others) bring up that they never would have bought it anyway, that statement is meant to count the argument that's often made by the industry that every download equals a lost sale. In other words, it's a financial/economic argument, so to counter it with a moral argument about whether or not people should or shouldn't be obligated to buy something is what looks rather silly.
Thank you Mr. Holmes, I am well aware. But in that case I'm more than happy to object because I personally dislike it when people go around expecting handouts. Note that even then my reply will be tastefully limited to something along the lines of "LOL STFU BRO" (see my first post in this thread).
Again, we're talking about video games here. Video games. To personally attack someone and demonize them as a thieving a pirating ingrate because they don't share your views is ridiculous.

I really don't think that the world is any danger because of some techno geek's hacked game and dumped ROM collection. Seriously, the fact that it goes against what you've brought to believe is morally right notwithstanding, does it really have any tangible effect on your life that people whom you'll never meet outside of a video game forum are playing said games without paying for them?

Who cares?
Naglfar
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 4:39 am

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Naglfar »

Udderdude wrote:Well this thread has gone off the deep end, so here's a picture of a cat being shot at by the rebels on Hoth.

Image
Crazy dodging there, is that cat one of those Japanese players?

We have to derail this before someone loses an eye. All the points everyone wants to make have been clearly established, everything else now is hopeless bickering. And here are those nuggets.

Image

Sorry it took so long, we were held up by pirates.
User avatar
Drum
Banned User
Posts: 2116
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 4:01 pm

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by Drum »

Nasirosuchus wrote:
BIL wrote:
No, it was a shitty post because it apparently suggested it's a problem to not go through life expecting handouts and free rides.
You're making a hasty generalization.

We're talking about video games here, not a free ride through life. Is it really that big of a deal? Are people dying because of copyright infringement? Are there food shortages because of copyright infringement? Are wars breaking out because of copyright infringement? Is the environment being destroyed because of copyright infringement?
LOL. How pointless what is, emulation? Be specific.
The pointlessness of continuing to bring morality into the argument when it's subjective and obviously won't change anyone's mind.
BIL wrote:Honestly, I was only taking a potshot at the idea that not carrying around a sense of entitlement about "free stuff" is bad.
When mjclark(and others) bring up that they never would have bought it anyway, that statement is meant to count the argument that's often made by the industry that every download equals a lost sale. In other words, it's a financial/economic argument, so to counter it with a moral argument about whether or not people should or shouldn't be obligated to buy something is what looks rather silly.
Thank you Mr. Holmes, I am well aware. But in that case I'm more than happy to object because I personally dislike it when people go around expecting handouts. Note that even then my reply will be tastefully limited to something along the lines of "LOL STFU BRO" (see my first post in this thread).
Again, we're talking about video games here. Video games. To personally attack someone and demonize them as a thieving a pirating ingrate because they don't share your views is ridiculous.

I really don't think that the world is any danger because of some techno geek's hacked game and dumped ROM collection. Seriously, the fact that it goes against what you've brought to believe is morally right notwithstanding, does it really have any tangible effect on your life that people whom you'll never meet outside of a video game forum are playing said games without paying for them?

Who cares?
hahahahahahahahahahaha

Stop.
IGMO - Poorly emulated, never beaten.

Hi-score thread: http://shmups.system11.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=34327
User avatar
mizuiroRSG
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:40 am

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by mizuiroRSG »

Naglfar wrote:
Udderdude wrote:Well this thread has gone off the deep end, so here's a picture of a cat being shot at by the rebels on Hoth.

Image
Crazy dodging there, is that cat one of those Japanese players?

We have to derail this before someone loses an eye. All the points everyone wants to make have been clearly established, everything else now is hopeless bickering. And here are those nuggets.

Image

Sorry it took so long, we were held up by pirates.
DATS EPIC

:shock:
COUPLE MORE SHOTS, SELECT YOUR...!
neorichieb1971
Posts: 7899
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:28 am
Location: Bedford, UK
Contact:

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by neorichieb1971 »

I care if you pirate videogames. In my perfect world you would be slammed to the wall and lashed with a whip 50 times.

In the real world. The tool to copy, exploit and *uck over anyone exists to freely use. Therefore like anyone said its a pointless exercise trying to change anyones mind.
This industry has become 2 dimensional as it transcended into a 3D world.
sorhp
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:14 pm

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by sorhp »

I haven't laughed so hard in a long time, I mean tears laughing!... Everyone is so serious, then from left field, the damn cat dodges the laser attacks every time!
User avatar
emphatic
Posts: 7987
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:47 pm
Location: Alingsås, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Too close for comfort? the revival?

Post by emphatic »

Drum wrote:hahahahahahahahahahaha

Stop.
Great argument.
Image | My games - http://www.emphatic.se
RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
Locked