Well, a lot of people (the first few that replied in the thread) and myself thought otherwise. Again - glad it did or will pan out, but it could've been taken many ways. "Depends on the success of the first one"... that just does not scream "confirmed" to me. Then again, I know jack about that game or the company making it.I'd hardly call what they said "vague".
Taken from the first post:but I did not say the same thing in both posts,
Taken from the second one, right after it.99% of the news brought up on this site get's shot down, regardless of whether or not a source is provided
Yeah, there was more there, but I think you get the idea. At least you've admitted it -- the first step to solving a problem.Once again, almost every piece of news brought up on this site get's treated as anecdotal.
