Actually, I suppose it could be fun...just so long as the proportions and ship speed for a 4:3-ish segment of the screen were right. It would almost have to be a bullet hell shooter, that or perhaps you could have some sort of "save spot" gimmick - hide out inbetween enemy/shot patterns, at the cost of not being able to grab any points.DJ Incompetent wrote:Has anybody even made one before?Dave_K. wrote:16:9 Widescreen Yoko Vertical Shooter....Noooooooo!
I kinda wanna play one.
1942: Joint Strike (PS3, 360)
-
StoofooEsq
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:21 am
1942:JS's aspect ratio doesn't bother me at all from watching it, but I'd have to play it myself to really see if would be comfortable with it.
The music is alright to me. Sort of sounds like a "heroic wartime" score that fits the time period, I think. Well, better fitting than the digital rat-tat-tat-tat-tat-tat-tat-tat *whistle* rat-tat-tat-tat-tat-tat-tat-tat-tat *whistle* "music" of the original 1942.kemical wrote:hmm the music and sound in the videos make the game seem less exciting, none of it really matches any of the onscreen stuff or enhances it.
-
SuperGrafx
- Posts: 834
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 5:21 am
- Location: United States
-
dave4shmups
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 2:01 am
- Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Looks awesome, here's an interview with one of the guys working on it. These guys obviously love shmups!
:
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/31859.html
Thank you Capcom!

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/31859.html
Thank you Capcom!

"Farewell to false pretension
Farewell to hollow words
Farewell to fake affection
Farewell, tomorrow burns"
Farewell to hollow words
Farewell to fake affection
Farewell, tomorrow burns"
the most specific post i read in this topic was
how comes the result being a greyish muddy ugly uninspiring weapon look, boring enemy and pattern design. oh and wtf a 16:9 hori shmup, I DONT GET IT, am i really expecting to much from the gaming industry?
tststs..
now you could say "hey what do you expect for $10", and i say i dont care, i rather pay $50 for a great one than $50 for five medicore shmups.
i dont get it, is there at least one gamer in this team who really loved the previous striker games especially the 1945 series.mmm... brown...
how comes the result being a greyish muddy ugly uninspiring weapon look, boring enemy and pattern design. oh and wtf a 16:9 hori shmup, I DONT GET IT, am i really expecting to much from the gaming industry?
tststs..
now you could say "hey what do you expect for $10", and i say i dont care, i rather pay $50 for a great one than $50 for five medicore shmups.
you know the strikers games and capcom's 1940 games are not the same series?i dont get it, is there at least one gamer in this team who really loved the previous striker games especially the 1945 series.
Damn Tim, you know there are quite a few Americans out there who still lives in tents due to this shitty economy, and you're dropping loads on a single game which only last 20 min. Do you think it's fair? How much did you spend this time?
yes, but for me the stikers 1945 I and II are the best out of the bunch and yes its a capcom deal but still even then the result could have been something much more colorful and fun to watch, something like "hey looks cool i wanna play it", this is just meh.Strider77 wrote:you know the strikers games and capcom's 1940 games are not the same series?i dont get it, is there at least one gamer in this team who really loved the previous striker games especially the 1945 series.
-
doctorx0079
- Posts: 1277
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 4:16 pm
- Location: Dayton, OH
- Contact:
That looks KICKIN RAD.dave4shmups wrote:Looks awesome, here's an interview with one of the guys working on it. These guys obviously love shmups!:
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/31859.html
Thank you Capcom!
SWY: Games are just for fun
-
Thunder Force
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:21 am
- Location: research and development facility for Vasteel Technology.
Confusing the two series has been common among mainstream players for years - so much so, that I wonder if the new devs of this project intentionally included the word "strike" in this one's subtitle hoping to confuse and pick up extra sales from casual Strikers fans.Strider77 wrote:you know the strikers games and capcom's 1940 games are not the same series?Rib wrote:i dont get it, is there at least one gamer in this team who really loved the previous striker games especially the 1945 series.

"Thunder Force VI does not suck, shut your fucking mouth." ~ Shane Bettenhausen
-
gameoverDude
- Posts: 2269
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:28 am
- Contact:
I was not impressed at first by the still pictures, but 1942 JS looks better in motion. For $10, it'll be worth trying anyhow.
Hopefully there will be 3 or more planes to choose from ala 19XX. Having only 2 planes with identical firepower in 1944 was a downer.
Benefit of the doubt given until I try this.
Hopefully there will be 3 or more planes to choose from ala 19XX. Having only 2 planes with identical firepower in 1944 was a downer.
Benefit of the doubt given until I try this.
Kinect? KIN NOT.
widescreen shooters that are vert don't bother me if that's the way they are made from the start.
Damn Tim, you know there are quite a few Americans out there who still lives in tents due to this shitty economy, and you're dropping loads on a single game which only last 20 min. Do you think it's fair? How much did you spend this time?
-
pixelcorps
- Posts: 797
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:52 am
- Location: JP
-
Thunder Force
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:21 am
- Location: research and development facility for Vasteel Technology.
"Yoko" essentially translates to "side". (For example, a side kick in karate can be known as a "yoko-geri", and in Yoko mode your screen is on its side.)pixelcorps wrote:no, it means vertically oriented.nimitz wrote:yoko means black(or artwork) borders on both sides
"Thunder Force VI does not suck, shut your fucking mouth." ~ Shane Bettenhausen
Yoko means "wide", or in the case of screen orientation, horizontal.Thunder Force wrote:"Yoko" essentially translates to "side". (For example, a side kick in karate can be known as a "yoko-geri", and in Yoko mode your screen is on its side.)pixelcorps wrote:no, it means vertically oriented.nimitz wrote:yoko means black(or artwork) borders on both sides
No. Yoko simply refers to horizontal screen orientation. So this game is a wide-screen yoko vert. It's screen orientation is yoko, but the game scrolls vertically.nimitz wrote: yoko means black(or artwork) borders on both sides
the term you should use is "widescreen horivert" or "16:9 vert scroling" (opposed to 4:3 vert or 9:16 vert)
16:9 yoko vert would mean playing a tate game on a non-rotated 16:9
-
professor ganson
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 3:59 am
- Location: OHIO
well.... don't forget folks here bought and play THE.Are you guys fucking kidding me? This looks like an absolute POS!!@#@!
Damn Tim, you know there are quite a few Americans out there who still lives in tents due to this shitty economy, and you're dropping loads on a single game which only last 20 min. Do you think it's fair? How much did you spend this time?
Omg
Maybe I'm easily suggestionable but it looks great to me. No plastic-ish at all (if you want to experience a REAL plastic game you should play Ninja Gaiden II on PS3) and pretty scenographic.
I'm looking forward to this one indeed.
Maybe I'm easily suggestionable but it looks great to me. No plastic-ish at all (if you want to experience a REAL plastic game you should play Ninja Gaiden II on PS3) and pretty scenographic.
I'm looking forward to this one indeed.
Alas, Ikaruga is going...
Undesired, unwanted them...
What makes them go?
Undesired, unwanted them...
What makes them go?