Can people change?

A place where you can chat about anything that isn't to do with games!
User avatar
Icarus
Posts: 7320
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 2:55 am
Location: England

Post by Icarus »

dave4shmups wrote:
Icarus wrote:So where is He now, when Man continues to commit sin against Him, and often in His name, left right and centre?
Right where He's always been-with His arms wide open; willing to accept anyone who will accept Him.
If He really existed, He would have done something about all the pain and suffering in the world, and not sit back in His Fluffy Armchair, offering out Divine Group Hugs, and watching as His Creation goes, for want of a better word, to Hell. If He was really compassionate before, what changed him into an Omnipotent Bystander? -_-;;

And religion is the catalyst of all wars throughout history. I have never believed there was a Divine Power before, I have no reason to believe in it now, and ever.
Image
User avatar
CMoon
Posts: 6207
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:28 pm

Post by CMoon »

Icarus wrote:If He was really compassionate before, what changed him into an Omnipotent Bystander? -_-;;
The fact that watching creation go to hell is more fun than pay-per-view???
Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
SHMUP sale page.
User avatar
Ex_Mosquito
Posts: 590
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: United Kingdom, Newport S.Wales

Post by Ex_Mosquito »

What i want to know is why has GOD only sent down ONE son, aka Jesus.
If someone in this day of age said they were the son of god they'd be put into a mental asylum, no question. Also i find it strange that the whole world goes by the day jesus was born (2005 years ago) something just doesnt add up. Sorry, i just dont buy any of it. Everything thats fucked up in the word is down to religion.
My Arcade 1-Credit Replays
http://www.youtube.com/user/exmosquito
User avatar
The n00b
Posts: 1490
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:31 am

Post by The n00b »

dave4shmups wrote:
The n00b wrote:If there is a god, why would he send an athiest to hell if the athiest was a basically good person? Isn't that kind of petty?
The problem with saying that atheist is "a good person" is that, according to the Bible, we're all in need of grace. To sin means to miss the mark, and even the best person does. Only a perfect person would not be in need of grace.

I'm not trying to hijack this thread or ignore anyone, just point out a way through which people can change.

"Here I am! I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in and eat with him, and he with me." Revelation 3:20

'Nuff said.
So someone like Hitler or Stalin can actually get into heaven before an athiest who was practically a saint all his life just because they were "christian?"

What if Buddha or Allah met you at the gates to heaven, Dave? Also what if these guys decide that because you didn't follow their "way" you weren't up to snuff? Wouldn't that be kinda dumb?
Proud citizen of the American Empire!
User avatar
Davey
Posts: 1605
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Toledo, OH

Post by Davey »

The n00b wrote:So someone like Hitler or Stalin can actually get into heaven before an athiest who was practically a saint all his life just because they were "christian?"
Assuming they were absolved for their sins, yes. But remember, it is beyond the capacity of a non-fundamentalist to understand God's will.
User avatar
PaCrappa
Posts: 1571
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:18 pm
Location: Seattle Rock City
Contact:

Post by PaCrappa »

I can change.

My undies.

Pa
User avatar
snap monkey
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 2:19 am

Post by snap monkey »

Icarus wrote:And religion is the catalyst of all wars throughout history.
Wow, but that's definitely not true. I don't know how you could back that up. Some wars, sure. But all wars, no.
User avatar
judesalmon
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Rule Britannia, Britannia Rules The Waves

Post by judesalmon »

Davey wrote:
The n00b wrote:So someone like Hitler or Stalin can actually get into heaven before an athiest who was practically a saint all his life just because they were "christian?"
Assuming they were absolved for their sins, yes. But remember, it is beyond the capacity of a non-fundamentalist to understand God's will.
Is that a joke?
Be attitude for gains:
1) Be praying...
2) Be praying...
3) Be praying...

And a shameless plug for the stuff I'm selling on eBay, if you're into that sort of thing.
User avatar
Ramus
Posts: 412
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by Ramus »

A few things:

We are as we are. If we change, that's because that is what we would do. If we don't choose to change, that's because we choose such a course. Hence, we just are.

For you bible thumpers out there: the book was written by man, who we know has flaws. Yet people follow it blindly saying because they have faith in God. Following the bible blindly only shows faith in the men who wrote it that they were honest in writing what God said to. There are so many holes and things that are very unclear that makes me wonder why God would want us to do something or act a certain way but be so cryptic about it. I'm not saying you can't and/or shouldn't follow what it says, but just try thinking a little before following something with faith. This is an amusing thought; what if Moses and his stone mason buddy got drunk one night and decided to play a big joke on everyone.

Moses: "Hey *hic*, I got a great joke to play on *hic* those idiots in town. Let's make some stone *hic* tablets with some rules on them and say *hic* God gave them to us and they should *hic* listen to us."

Friend: "Yeah! Yeah! Then we can *hic* hide them up on the mountain there and you can *hic* come down holding them and scare the *hic* shit out of them saying God is mad and *hic* they better do as the tablets say or else."

Four months later...

Moses and Friend at same time: "Uh-oh... this is getting out of hand."


Last thing: take a look at what you think you know and realize that you really know nothing. To say you "know" something is a pretty arrogant thing to say. No one can ever truly know something down to its every detail. Science works on theory which can be replaced by a new better theory at any given time. Some theorys are based on earlier theorys and so on. Remember E=mc2 (square)? That was supposed to be a solid theory which much work was based on. The speed of light has been exceeded in a lab already... blah blah... so do you see what I'm saying?

Man and society is a funny thing; especially when looked at with change in mind. I'm not sure if it was Rando who was saying people follow something wrong because they don't want to go against the alpha male, but that's funny stuff because a lot of people do it. I just think it's ammusing to watch life and people who are set in a certain way fight to keep doing their way when a more efficient solution presents itself. Life's too short to be so stuborn; just give it a try will ya?

Yeah, this thread is long gone. Sorry man.
My Collection
Currently playing: Research (sigh)
User avatar
Davey
Posts: 1605
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Toledo, OH

Post by Davey »

judesalmon wrote:Is that a joke?
I almost replied with a long, smartass elaboration of my previous statement, but I'll waste less of everybody's time and just say "yes."
Ramus wrote:Science works on theory which can be replaced by a new better theory at any given time.
Same with Christianity. In the eyes of the Catholic church, Galileo has been an innocent man for more than two decades.
Randorama
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:25 pm

Post by Randorama »

Davey wrote: Same with Christianity. In the eyes of the Catholic church, Galileo has been an innocent man for more than two decades.
Eppur si muove! (Yet, it moves!). Dunno if Galileo was speaking about planets. But well, if they need to, they may sanctify him.

Marketing is the Anti-christ, i'd add :?
"The only desire the Culture could not satisfy from within itself was one common to both the descendants of its original human stock and the machines [...]: the urge not to feel useless."

I.M. Banks, "Consider Phlebas" (1988: 43).
User avatar
Specineff
Posts: 5771
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:54 am
Location: Ari-Freaking-Zona!
Contact:

Post by Specineff »

Icarus wrote:
dave4shmups wrote:
Icarus wrote:So where is He now, when Man continues to commit sin against Him, and often in His name, left right and centre?
Right where He's always been-with His arms wide open; willing to accept anyone who will accept Him.
If He really existed, He would have done something about all the pain and suffering in the world, and not sit back in His Fluffy Armchair, offering out Divine Group Hugs, and watching as His Creation goes, for want of a better word, to Hell. If He was really compassionate before, what changed him into an Omnipotent Bystander? -_-;;.
I got a better question. How many of us have spent time to bring those matters into His attention and beg mercy and help from him instead of asking him to get out of our lives? Or even more: show mercy to our fellow man, if we can't see God's hand doing so?

Let's suppose there's no God. Fine. What keeps us from doing unto others what we want to be done unto us?

This is surely getting out of hand. Can't believe the rabid defense of views opposed to christianity.

My Mod-sense is tingling.
Last edited by Specineff on Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don't hold grudges. GET EVEN.
User avatar
Neon
Posts: 3529
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:31 pm

Post by Neon »


Let's suppose there's no God. Fine. What keeps us from doing unto others what we want to be done unto us?

This is surely getting out of hand. Can't believe the rabid defense of views opposed to christianity.

My Mod-sense is tingling.
Your only motivation to not go out raping and pillaging is God?

Anyways, there's no need to lock an otherwise intelligent thread because you're uncomfortable with antireligious views that wouldn't have been expressed if you all had kept quiet in the first place.

Surely you didn't expect everyone to agree with you...were you then trying to get the thread locked?
User avatar
sffan
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:18 pm
Location: Greensboro, NC

Post by sffan »

Ramus wrote: The speed of light has been exceeded in a lab already...
Not true, even if you're talking about quantum non-locality.

I agree with your point though. Good post.

Mixing science & religion never leads anywhere. The bible contains no science. It was written by people who were much more ignorant than we are about how nature works. Back then they didn't have telescopes, satellites, space probes, particle accellerators, or any of the tools that we have to probe nature, except their 5 senses. Now we know many things that the bible-writers could only speculate about, incorrectly. So to point to the bible to "prove" scientific matters is absurd. I've seen people do this, and it drives me nuts.

The bible is an old book written by scientifically ignorant people. It is unfortunate that so many people today are perhaps just as ignorant as they were 2000 years ago and are totally unaware of important discoveries up to the present day. It's a result of poor science education, but I'll stop ranting now.
SHOOT IT QUICKLY !
User avatar
Specineff
Posts: 5771
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:54 am
Location: Ari-Freaking-Zona!
Contact:

Post by Specineff »

Neon wrote:

Let's suppose there's no God. Fine. What keeps us from doing unto others what we want to be done unto us?

This is surely getting out of hand. Can't believe the rabid defense of views opposed to christianity.

My Mod-sense is tingling.
Your only motivation to not go out raping and pillaging is God?

Anyways, there's no need to lock an otherwise intelligent thread because you're uncomfortable with antireligious views that wouldn't have been expressed if you all had kept quiet in the first place.

Surely you didn't expect everyone to agree with you...were you then trying to get the thread locked?
Of course not. If you read my posts over here, they don't sound that bible-thumping, do they? But I'm just pointing at the fact the thread is getting out of hand and might be locked.

Very different from: "Mods please lock this thread. PLZ KTHX."

Uh.. not sure about the raping and pillaging. Not for me, though. Heh.
Don't hold grudges. GET EVEN.
User avatar
judesalmon
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Rule Britannia, Britannia Rules The Waves

Post by judesalmon »

It is true that the majority of Western morality - and therefore our laws - is based on Judeo-Christian beliefs, but it is totally untrue to say that God is the only reason that why most people obey the law.

I would say that most of the people posting on this site are British or American, both of which, legally, are considered secular societies. Both have separataion between religion/education and law, meaning that secularism is promoted by the governement.

No matter how much Bush claims God told him to invade Iraq, or Blair says we need a return to Christian values, this secularism is protected.

I absolutely don't believe in God, and I have yet to break the law, so it's obviously not him who stops me going out to murder people.
Be attitude for gains:
1) Be praying...
2) Be praying...
3) Be praying...

And a shameless plug for the stuff I'm selling on eBay, if you're into that sort of thing.
User avatar
CMoon
Posts: 6207
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:28 pm

Post by CMoon »

I just wanted to be the first to say I'm an agnostic and to my knowledge I have neither 1) raped and pilaged and 2) had thoughts about raping and pilaging.

I think sometimes religious folk forget all the values that come directly from society--not from religion. We learn to be social, we learn to value the people in our community, we come to believe in the rights of others and something called Justice. If you want to believe in some ultimate sense that this comes from God, that's fine, but in a very proximate sense it comes from society, that we are social, and we must live by rules that allow us to live together (and these rules stem from societal values).

I've never liked the idea that values cannot exist without God as an argument for God. If God is the ultimate cause of everything, than I suppose this statement would end up being true, but it in of itself does not neccesitate God. Since societies cannot function (even insect societies) without societal rules/values--and that these can come into place and even be fully executed without consciousness, it seems to me that God need not necessarily be called into play for the existance of societal values.
Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
SHMUP sale page.
Randorama
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:25 pm

Post by Randorama »

Specineff wrote:
Uh.. not sure about the raping and pillaging. Not for me, though. Heh.
Let's put it in this way: if you think that you need a God to behave like a human being, i think you're in a very bad situation. Long before The birth of Joshua ben Hiram, known as " the Christ", there were many other forms in many other cultures which placed, in the respect of common rules and social cohesion, the basic notions of civilization. The terms "filialitas" (fraternity) , or " Άάγάπέ" (Agapé, which is roughly fraternity as well, and has been quickly absorbed into christian doctrines from his hellenic roots) existed centuries before.

I gre up in Italy, in which the "christians" are mostly catholic. We have the highest percentage of volunteers and non-profits organizations of Europe, and a good chunk of these volunteers (i think 40%) are NOT christians, including myself. Back when i was in Italy, i worked for free, helping a christian organization (Caritas) in their work. I have a bank account with an "Ethic bank", in the sense that all my interests go to organizations which help the poor.

I am completely atheist, as well.

Solidarity, in case you wonder, is an excellent method to lower stress and tension, from a social point of view. I'm not "leftist" (whatever the word may mean, now), so i don't endorse social-awareness policies because of any kind of religious or political creed.

I never had problems of people trying to convert me, even if i often worked with women and men of God, because they were more bothered about my acts, than my words or shallow beliefs.The only people trying to convert me, so far, have been the ones who are more obsessed with useless forms and rituals.

Among other things, helping people, in my opinion, can lead to changes: changes in their opportunities for the future, their approach to life and other people as well.

Asking for the lock of a thread because people don't share your beliefs is, to say the least, questionable. Pretending that the only obstacle to the regression to a feral attitude toward others is any divinity is, well, somewhat ridicolous: i can't think of any variant of "Christianity" that endorses such an hermeneutics of the holy scriptures.

In the words of the Christ himself, "who is without sin, throw the first stone". Or, like a catholic proverb says, "Help yourself and God will help you".
"The only desire the Culture could not satisfy from within itself was one common to both the descendants of its original human stock and the machines [...]: the urge not to feel useless."

I.M. Banks, "Consider Phlebas" (1988: 43).
User avatar
Ramus
Posts: 412
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:38 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by Ramus »

sffan wrote:
Ramus wrote: The speed of light has been exceeded in a lab already...
Not true, even if you're talking about quantum non-locality.

I agree with your point though. Good post.

Mixing science & religion never leads anywhere. The bible contains no science. It was written by people who were much more ignorant than we are about how nature works. Back then they didn't have telescopes, satellites, space probes, particle accellerators, or any of the tools that we have to probe nature, except their 5 senses. Now we know many things that the bible-writers could only speculate about, incorrectly. So to point to the bible to "prove" scientific matters is absurd. I've seen people do this, and it drives me nuts.

The bible is an old book written by scientifically ignorant people. It is unfortunate that so many people today are perhaps just as ignorant as they were 2000 years ago and are totally unaware of important discoveries up to the present day. It's a result of poor science education, but I'll stop ranting now.
Sorry man, but they have. They can make photons (units of light) go faster than they normally can, blah blah. Here's a link to a really quick summary on what they did.

http://science.howstuffworks.com/news-item6.htm

Glad to see you understand what I said though. :)
My Collection
Currently playing: Research (sigh)
User avatar
Marc
Posts: 3607
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 10:27 am
Location: Wigan, England.

Post by Marc »

I firmly believe that people can change. If you hit them hard enough. In the face. Sorry, but after the year I had this year, I sincerely believe it's the only way of getting through to the majority of people. How people are so quick to pass judgement on others while completely ignoring their own past actions and experiences is beyond me.
User avatar
judesalmon
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Rule Britannia, Britannia Rules The Waves

Post by judesalmon »

The n00b wrote:So someone like Hitler or Stalin can actually get into heaven before an athiest who was practically a saint all his life just because they were "christian?"
To add to what Davey said:

According to Catholicism, if a person truly repents for their sins to a priest and accepts God, has been baptised and undergone the Holy Commuinion, then any sin can be forgiven.
Be attitude for gains:
1) Be praying...
2) Be praying...
3) Be praying...

And a shameless plug for the stuff I'm selling on eBay, if you're into that sort of thing.
User avatar
Specineff
Posts: 5771
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:54 am
Location: Ari-Freaking-Zona!
Contact:

Post by Specineff »

Uh, Rando... not sure why it seems I do need to use God as a "crutch" to behave. Hurting others is wrong, God or no God. Just like I said, rape and pillage, not for me.

Why are you guys putting words in my mouth? I never requested someone to close the thread. Just said that my mod sense was tingling, so as to let everyone know that if we don't keep it civil, then they may intervene. I've never felt my beliefs attacked, though I had to present my counterpoint to some views expressed here.


Thanks.
Don't hold grudges. GET EVEN.
User avatar
snap monkey
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 2:19 am

Post by snap monkey »

sffan wrote:
Ramus wrote: The speed of light has been exceeded in a lab already...
Mixing science & religion never leads anywhere. The bible contains no science. It was written by people who were much more ignorant than we are about how nature works. Back then they didn't have telescopes, satellites, space probes, particle accellerators, or any of the tools that we have to probe nature, except their 5 senses. Now we know many things that the bible-writers could only speculate about, incorrectly. So to point to the bible to "prove" scientific matters is absurd. I've seen people do this, and it drives me nuts.

The bible is an old book written by scientifically ignorant people. It is unfortunate that so many people today are perhaps just as ignorant as they were 2000 years ago and are totally unaware of important discoveries up to the present day. It's a result of poor science education, but I'll stop ranting now.
The bible isn't supposed to be a science textbook, nor a history textbook. A lot of people take it too literally.

For instance, the bible says that God made the world in six days, on the sixth day he made man and then rested on the seventh. Well, humans have only been around for a couple thousand years, which would then mean that the whole earth itself would only be a few days older than us. But there are rocks on earth that we know to be several million years old. Dinosaurs and what not. So it's impossible for that to be literally true.

So what's the point you should take away from that story, if you believe in it? God made the earth. The other details about how many days it took and what he did on each day was just to give basis for the concept of a week and to also lay the ground for the Jewish Sabbath. People who contend that it happened exactly as it was written in the good book are missing the point and can't see the forest for the trees.

IMO
Randorama
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:25 pm

Post by Randorama »

Sorry but:
Specineff wrote: Or even more: show mercy to our fellow man, if we can't see God's hand doing so?
Again, i don't need anyone's hand to help my fellow cret...ehr, man. but...



Specineff, again wrote: Let's suppose there's no God. Fine. What keeps us from doing unto others what we want to be done unto us?
I'll answer you with another question: Why shouldn't be a philantropic individual if i don't believe in various divinities?
Specineff, thrice wrote: This is surely getting out of hand. Can't believe the rabid defense of views opposed to christianity.
Where are those defenses? Saying that i'm atheist? But atheism is not against religion, is simply not believing (from ancient greek, "αθέος". a-theos, literally "without divinities" ). Saying that i don't buy a set of beliefs doesn't entail that i'm against them. One missing detail, though: i have all the right to be against a set of beliefs, even if (personally) think that it's pretty futile. If i think that something is wrong, i have the right to do so, and have to face the consequences of this. Beside that, i think that there is an *abyss* between some of the people who i know as "Christians", like some missionaries, and the WASP maggots who thump their bibles and pretend that their blue eyes grant them Heaven, so defining better "Christianity" would be better, i suppose.
sffan wrote: It is unfortunate that so many people today are perhaps just as ignorant as they were 2000 years ago and are totally unaware of important discoveries up to the present day.
Eh, but you aren't born with embedded knowledge. Everyone of us still needs to go to school to sum up (a sort of "ontogenesis recapitulates phylogenesis") those 2000 years, else the...default brain is the same as 10,000 years ago, more or less.Let's not forget that not everybody is so lucky to obtain a good education, especially when this implies a lot of money. In some sense, yes, can people change? I think so, if the education they receive make them more than barbarians. A person with a Ph.D. in anything ,who thinks that nuking everyone (who disagrees with him) is the only solution,honestly, is the a troglodyte with a big degree (i.e. Von Neumann).
"The only desire the Culture could not satisfy from within itself was one common to both the descendants of its original human stock and the machines [...]: the urge not to feel useless."

I.M. Banks, "Consider Phlebas" (1988: 43).
User avatar
Accutron
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Ohio, USA

Post by Accutron »

Randorama wrote:the...default brain is the same as 10,000 years ago, more or less.
The figure is actually closer to 100,000 years, for relatively unchanged cranial capacity and skeletal structure.
Image
User avatar
Specineff
Posts: 5771
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:54 am
Location: Ari-Freaking-Zona!
Contact:

Post by Specineff »

You're missing my whole point, Rando.

My reply was to that rhetoric that goes "why does God allow people to suffer, why doesn't he do anything?" To that I reply: "Why don't *YOU* do anything?"

(Now, before someone goes ahead and says that I'm saying that in response to someone, IT'S MY PERSONAL REPLY TO THAT KIND OF QUESTION. Thanks.)
Randorama wrote:
I'll answer you with another question: Why shouldn't be a philantropic individual if i don't believe in various divinities?

Did I say otherwise? More power to you. Honest.
Don't hold grudges. GET EVEN.
Randorama
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:25 pm

Post by Randorama »

Accutron wrote:
Randorama wrote:the...default brain is the same as 10,000 years ago, more or less.
The figure is actually closer to 100,000 years, for relatively unchanged cranial capacity and skeletal structure.
yeah, he basic elements of social organization and abstract thought can be traced back between 40,000 and 10,000 years ago, i think. (as always, too lazy to google :? ).
"The only desire the Culture could not satisfy from within itself was one common to both the descendants of its original human stock and the machines [...]: the urge not to feel useless."

I.M. Banks, "Consider Phlebas" (1988: 43).
Randorama
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:25 pm

Post by Randorama »

Still, where's the rabid attack against "Christianity"? And what's "Christianity"?
And what this has to do with the thread?

I find amazing how some people manage to throw in religion in every thread that isn't about Tacos, which is what Neon said earlier, more or less, no?

It would be a nice *change* if people would stop to hijack threads with their own personal ravings, i think, especially when the threads are extremely polit and quite rational like this one.
"The only desire the Culture could not satisfy from within itself was one common to both the descendants of its original human stock and the machines [...]: the urge not to feel useless."

I.M. Banks, "Consider Phlebas" (1988: 43).
User avatar
Specineff
Posts: 5771
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:54 am
Location: Ari-Freaking-Zona!
Contact:

Post by Specineff »

I never said the word "attack".
Don't hold grudges. GET EVEN.
User avatar
sffan
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:18 pm
Location: Greensboro, NC

Post by sffan »

snap monkey wrote:
sffan wrote:
Ramus wrote: The speed of light has been exceeded in a lab already...
Mixing science & religion never leads anywhere. The bible contains no science. It was written by people who were much more ignorant than we are about how nature works. Back then they didn't have telescopes, satellites, space probes, particle accellerators, or any of the tools that we have to probe nature, except their 5 senses. Now we know many things that the bible-writers could only speculate about, incorrectly. So to point to the bible to "prove" scientific matters is absurd. I've seen people do this, and it drives me nuts.

The bible is an old book written by scientifically ignorant people. It is unfortunate that so many people today are perhaps just as ignorant as they were 2000 years ago and are totally unaware of important discoveries up to the present day. It's a result of poor science education, but I'll stop ranting now.
The bible isn't supposed to be a science textbook, nor a history textbook. A lot of people take it too literally.

For instance, the bible says that God made the world in six days, on the sixth day he made man and then rested on the seventh. Well, humans have only been around for a couple thousand years, which would then mean that the whole earth itself would only be a few days older than us. But there are rocks on earth that we know to be several million years old. Dinosaurs and what not. So it's impossible for that to be literally true.

So what's the point you should take away from that story, if you believe in it? God made the earth. The other details about how many days it took and what he did on each day was just to give basis for the concept of a week and to also lay the ground for the Jewish Sabbath. People who contend that it happened exactly as it was written in the good book are missing the point and can't see the forest for the trees.

IMO
Sure, now that we know the true age of the earth we can say that the 6-day thing should not be taken literally.

However, before people knew anything about natural history, Christians did believe this literally. It may have been meant as literally 6 days by the authors. So, should every passage that is proved incorrect be then looked at in a metaphorical way? That seems silly to me too, since the original intent was literal.
SHOOT IT QUICKLY !
Post Reply