
I told her if she just waited a bit longer she would see it wasn't really about snuff films and bdsm but she lacks patience.
It is closeEmperorIng wrote:If it's close by, Terminator+Streets of Fire sounds like an awesome double-feature.
It's pretty repetitive when it comes down to it, but I still found it engaging all the way through.blackoak wrote:How was the Human Condition trilogy?
Nothing can go wrong with Re-AnimatorBIL wrote:Should've gone with Re-Animator.
He called it two hours of Harrison Ford looking at things, doing nothing. Is it too pretentious to say that it's a movie that tells its story largely visually?drauch wrote:How can you put up with such clear lack of taste? And of all things, Blade Runner!EmperorIng wrote: My older brother, upon watching Blade Runner for the first time with me (or rather, he lost interest and drifted in and out), called it slow, dull, and boring. How can I put up with such clear lack of taste?
You don't.
It's such a terrible film. And of course, that's levying criticism at it purely as a popcorn movie. The Dark Knight is like an art house flick in comparison. And that dialogue? Worst script of all time? Incredible new lows? Is it a bird, a plane, or some talentless hack who wrote thirty pages on his ipad while sitting on the crapper? Most certainly.Vexorg wrote:Man of Steel: **1/2
I'm a bit surprised at some of the strongly negative reaction to this film on here.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
First time I watched Blade Runner, I did get bored and turned it off. It seemed like a good movie, I just didn't feel like finishing it at the time. I eventually did.EmperorIng wrote:He called it two hours of Harrison Ford looking at things, doing nothing. Is it too pretentious to say that it's a movie that tells its story largely visually?drauch wrote:How can you put up with such clear lack of taste? And of all things, Blade Runner!EmperorIng wrote: My older brother, upon watching Blade Runner for the first time with me (or rather, he lost interest and drifted in and out), called it slow, dull, and boring. How can I put up with such clear lack of taste?
You don't.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
Nice -- I was just wondering if any assholes would play it here. AFAIK, it did not get a proper J-release, w/ subtitles... unfortunately something necessary to play it in a Japanese movie theater. There's a small 'club' which plays old movies, assuming they generate enough buzz on their website. This is the group that played Patlabor 2 a few months ago, and is doing not one but two showings of Patlabor: the Movie and Akira over the next month.PC Engine Fan X! wrote:Early this year, my local movie theater was offering the special chance to show the Blade Runner: The Final Cut version on the big screen but it was a one night special engagement type of deal.
Fuck yes we do.So say we all.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
Hey man, take a chill pill. Its only a movie. You know superman is a kids movie with adult dressing don't you? At least they got rid of the overpants. If you went in to see a Zack Snyder movie you probably wouldn't be disappointed.Skykid wrote:It's such a terrible film. And of course, that's levying criticism at it purely as a popcorn movie. The Dark Knight is like an art house flick in comparison. And that dialogue? Worst script of all time? Incredible new lows? Is it a bird, a plane, or some talentless hack who wrote thirty pages on his ipad while sitting on the crapper? Most certainly.Vexorg wrote:Man of Steel: **1/2
I'm a bit surprised at some of the strongly negative reaction to this film on here.
Couldn't believe the words that were coming out of their mouths.
Man of Lead is what it was; completely soulless, loud, humourless claptrap with a horrible bunch of dumb shit, aimless characters and completely stupid plotting and events. When that useless Spanish Alien asks "What shall I tell Zod?" and that complete shit-for-brains general replies "I don't care what you tell him", completely in-keeping with professional standards of military practice for first encounters with an intergalactic race, I was fighting not to leave the theatre. It was as though I was bogged down by Kryptonite and forced to face the endless horror of Hollywood's freshest diahorrea.
Superdumb.
Mother fucker. Rethinking if I'm going to see this now.neorichieb1971 wrote:At least they got rid of the overpants.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
I sincerely hope that that score you've given is out of four stars.IDruggedShamu wrote:Monsters University - ***
I'm a sucker for anything Pixar related; however, while I enjoyed MU, it was definitely lacking compared to the original. It was able to flesh itself out by the end credits, but for awhile there, I found myself frustrated with the movie... It wasn't Cars or Cars 2 bad, but more like Brave "meh."
Here's to hoping that Finding Dory will be on the same level as TS3.
Not a fact that was entirely lost on me.neorichieb1971 wrote: Hey man, take a chill pill. Its only a movie.
Actually, very disappointed. I didn't know it was a Snyder movie until the credits soared in to relieve me of rigor mortis, at which point I sat upright in stark disbelief.You know superman is a kids movie with adult dressing don't you? At least they got rid of the overpants. If you went in to see a Zack Snyder movie you probably wouldn't be disappointed.
Thanks friend. People with your level of critical faculties are why these preposterously bullshit movies will continue to turn over a billion dollars, and subsequently continue to be made. Hollywood rest easy knowing there are people out there who really can't tell when they're being fed awful scripting, dialogue, acting and plotting, which makes their life so much easier.Ixmucane2 wrote:As a reboot of a comic book character, it's even better than Batman Begins.
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
It was 3 out of 5boagman wrote:I sincerely hope that that score you've given is out of four stars.IDruggedShamu wrote:Monsters University - ***
I'm a sucker for anything Pixar related; however, while I enjoyed MU, it was definitely lacking compared to the original. It was able to flesh itself out by the end credits, but for awhile there, I found myself frustrated with the movie... It wasn't Cars or Cars 2 bad, but more like Brave "meh."
Here's to hoping that Finding Dory will be on the same level as TS3.
I went and saw MU with my girlfriend last night, and while I'd agree that it's not quite in the rarified air that MI was/is, I found it very, very good, and downright hilarious. I was rollicking at certain points, and I enjoyed it pretty much all the way through (though the beginning did drag a bit more than the rest of it). I liked it at least a decent letter grade better than "Brave" (which I thought was pretty decent...an okay rebound for Pixar from the atrocity that is "Cars 2" [which, in my opinion, based on how lousy "Cars" was, never should have been made in the first place]), but you're right in that it's not up in the stratosphere with TS3, "The Incredibles", MI, and perhaps a couple of others.
While I wouldn't give it a "grand slam home run" rating, I'd give MU a stand-up triple that easily knocks in a couple of runs, allowing the guy from first to cross home plate without the need for a slide. They hit all the right comic notes, and I enjoyed myself pretty silly at this one. Can't ask too much more than that.
Oh, and I didn't see it in the 3-D B.S., either. I've not been convinced that any Pixar movie needs the 3-D treatment. Heck, most movies don't.
Also: which part of Russell Crowe's contract stipulated he wasn't required to do any acting? Let's face it, he was atrocious.Sly Cherry Chunks wrote: Man Of Steel - some good stuff as well as shit. I actually liked the Father, the Son and the Holy Hologram.
Girlfriend on the ending: "Why didn't superman just put his hand over Zod's eyes?"
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts