Ace Combat 4 & 5 - Opinions?

A place where you can chat about anything that isn't to do with games!
Post Reply
User avatar
Accutron
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Ohio, USA

Ace Combat 4 & 5 - Opinions?

Post by Accutron »

I've never played any of the Ace Combat games, but they seem to get good reviews. How realistic are they, in regards to physics, damage, weapons, etc? Which is the better game, 4 or 5? I'm looking for more sim, less arcade. I don't care about things like plot or character development. I just want to shoot down MiGs in the most authentic way possible. Are there any better PS2 alternatives? My only experience with current-gen flying games is Top Gun: CZ, and it was a steaming pile of crap that left me a bit gun-shy for the whole pseudo-sim genre.
Image
User avatar
Ghegs
Posts: 5075
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:18 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by Ghegs »

Ace Combats are pretty much arcade. Not to say they aren't fun (I had a blast with AC4), but if you're looking for a sim, go elsewhere.

You'll want to look into PC gaming for the sim-like approach.
No matter how good a game is, somebody will always hate it. No matter how bad a game is, somebody will always love it.

My videos
User avatar
Accutron
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Ohio, USA

Post by Accutron »

Ghegs wrote:You'll want to look into PC gaming for the sim-like approach.
I don't have a PC :wink:

I'm still using an old OS9 Mac and have no plans to upgrade. This severely limits my flight sim options. I'm looking for a PS2 game that I can find easily at a used game store, so I can introduce my kid to flying combat. I'd prefer he not think a F-15 can carry 50 missiles, but I'll take what I can get as long as it's a quality game. I was hoping for something with realistic detail, like stalling, takeoff and landing procedures, etc. It doesn't have to be precisely realistic, but the closer the better.
Image
User avatar
Ghegs
Posts: 5075
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:18 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by Ghegs »

Well, AC4 does have takeoff and landing as optional procedures if I remember correctly. No stallling, though.

Haven't played AC5 so I can't say anything about that.
No matter how good a game is, somebody will always hate it. No matter how bad a game is, somebody will always love it.

My videos
User avatar
Last Guardian
Posts: 126
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Les Pays Bas

Post by Last Guardian »

If you put hard mode on it becomes pretty sim-like (as in: too much for me to remember). They aren't overly simple games though; there's buttons for bank, roll and all those things for you to fiddle with, if you wan't.

I personally enjoyed AC4 quite a bit more then 5 but mainly for it's storyline and the way it's presented. Almost poetic stuff. AC5 has a more gritty story with lots of heavy guitars and stuff and only improves on it's predesessor by featuring more plane/armament options and a tiny graphical update (both look awesome though).
Airspace under control get back 100 %
User avatar
Thunder Force
Posts: 1773
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:21 am
Location: research and development facility for Vasteel Technology.

Re: Ace Combat 4 & 5 - Opinions?

Post by Thunder Force »

Accutron wrote:I've never played any of the Ace Combat games, but they seem to get good reviews. How realistic are they, in regards to physics, damage, weapons, etc?
Little to no physics or weapons damage simulated in the series. Totally unrealistic.
Accutron wrote:Which is the better game, 4 or 5?
Ace Combat 4 has a beautiful narrative so I'm going to say that one.
Accutron wrote:I'm looking for more sim, less arcade. I don't care about things like plot or character development.
Then Ace Combat 4 or 5 are not for you.
Accutron wrote:I just want to shoot down MiGs in the most authentic way possible. Are there any better PS2 alternatives?
Go now and import Taito's absolutely amazing PS2 flight combat game Energy Airforce II: Aimstrike, and never look back.
"Thunder Force VI does not suck, shut your fucking mouth." ~ Shane Bettenhausen
User avatar
MSZ
Posts: 637
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 5:13 am
Location: Toronto, ON.

Post by MSZ »

AC4 > AC5 period.
User avatar
TWITCHDOCTOR
Posts: 1479
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: South Texas USA
Contact:

Post by TWITCHDOCTOR »

Ace Combat 5 was pretty boring...almost as much fun as watching golf on TV.
I didn't play all the way through...the first 45 minutes pretty much convinced me to turn that sucker off.
User avatar
Accutron
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Ohio, USA

Post by Accutron »

I stopped by a game store today, got a copy of AC4 for a good price. It seems pretty okay so far. The arcadey-ness isn't too overwhelming, and I discovered that you can stall your plane by braking hard. I like the fact that it starts you out with an F-4, my favorite military fighter, though I wish they had selected a variant other than the F-4E, which has the slim nose, rather than the cool fat nose of the C/D/J etc.

I also picked up Tempest X3. Does anybody know if there's a way to unlock Tempest 2000 without earning 500k points? I'd rather not have to bust my balls in X first, just to unlock 2000.

Are there any other changes in 2000 from the Jag version, other than the hard spikes problem?
Image
User avatar
Thunder Force
Posts: 1773
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:21 am
Location: research and development facility for Vasteel Technology.

Post by Thunder Force »

Accutron wrote:I stopped by a game store today, got a copy of AC4 for a good price. It seems pretty okay so far. The arcadey-ness isn't too overwhelming, and I discovered that you can stall your plane by braking hard.
That's correct, although once you get more modern planes it seems to let you get away with a lot more erratic manuevers. In a way, flying the Phantom is more satisfying because there are still limitations placed on your flight. But if you're able to enjoy the arcade aspects of AC4 then it's really an incredibly immersive aircraft game, which I enjoyed greatly. One of Namco's best titles this gen, I think. The thought they put into level design and missions is unmatched, and although it's linear you can actually keep playing the game over again repeatedly at higher difficulties for new custom aircraft paintjobs which gives good replay value. I had a great time with this game, although eventually felt the need to play stuff with better physics and difficulty like Sony's Dropship (VTOL fans check this out) and of course the aforementioned Aimstrike, which is one of my favorite games of all time...
Accutron wrote:I also picked up Tempest X3. Does anybody know if there's a way to unlock Tempest 2000 without earning 500k points? I'd rather not have to bust my balls in X first, just to unlock 2000.
No there's no other way. You have to reach that score threshold and then enter the secret initials (then remember to save your game). Tempest X isn't an overly hard game though, so that score mark is not as high as it looks (I didn't have trouble doing it and am probably only an average Tempest player).
Accutron wrote:Are there any other changes in 2000 from the Jag version, other than the hard spikes problem?
None that I can think of other than the hard spikes, which is a pretty big bug sadly, but it's also worth noting - so you're not too disappointed - that this version of Tempest 2K once you unlock it, only features the authentic primitive OST of the Jag cartridge version, and doesn't let you play to the high quality CD audio soundtrack of later versions, even though that CD soundtrack is used for Tempest X mode.

(Then again, the CD audio music looping in Tempest X mode screws up constantly on my version anyway when playing it on a PS2...)
"Thunder Force VI does not suck, shut your fucking mouth." ~ Shane Bettenhausen
User avatar
Accutron
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Ohio, USA

Post by Accutron »

Thunder Force wrote:
Accutron wrote:I also picked up Tempest X3. Does anybody know if there's a way to unlock Tempest 2000 without earning 500k points? I'd rather not have to bust my balls in X first, just to unlock 2000.
No there's no other way. You have to reach that score threshold and then enter the secret initials (then remember to save your game). Tempest X isn't an overly hard game though, so that score mark is not as high as it looks (I didn't have trouble doing it and am probably only an average Tempest player).
Oh well...guess I'll just have to buckle down and get it done.
Thunder Force wrote:
Accutron wrote:Are there any other changes in 2000 from the Jag version, other than the hard spikes problem?
None that I can think of other than the hard spikes, which is a pretty big bug sadly, but it's also worth noting - so you're not too disappointed - that this version of Tempest 2K once you unlock it, only features the authentic primitive OST of the Jag cartridge version, and doesn't let you play to the high quality CD audio soundtrack of later versions, even though that CD soundtrack is used for Tempest X mode.

(Then again, the CD audio music looping in Tempest X mode screws up constantly on my version anyway when playing it on a PS2...)
Yeah the music glitches some on my PS2 too...in much the same way as R-Type Delta, though the music in Tempest X doesn't have as much of a presence as Delta's so it's not nearly as concentration-breaking when it skips.

I suppose there wasn't enough room on the disc to include 2K's CD audio?
Image
User avatar
Last Guardian
Posts: 126
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Les Pays Bas

Re: Ace Combat 4 & 5 - Opinions?

Post by Last Guardian »

Thunder Force wrote: Go now and import Taito's absolutely amazing PS2 flight combat game Energy Airforce II: Aimstrike, and never look back.
Cheers, was going to ask you if this was text heavy but saw it also got a PAL release, so will prolly pick this up later.
Airspace under control get back 100 %
Post Reply