So you're saying it's an Ex-Box?Friendly wrote:Japanese gamers are apparently calling it batsuichi (バツイチ, X = batsu) which means "divorced".
Maybe that means they have officially divorced Xbox.
PS4 / Xbox One console war
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
Typos caused by cat on keyboard.
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
Xbox 360 already flopped in Japan, from the looks of it they might as well not even release the Xbox One over there.
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
There's some hope PS4 won't go down the same road as Xbone:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013- ... used-gamesI sat down with Yoshida a few hours after the PS4 reveal tonight and one of the first things I asked was whether used games would be blocked.
"Do you want us to do that?" he asked.
No, I said. I think, if you buy something on a disc, that you have a kind of moral contract with the person you've bought it from that you retain some of that value and you can pass it on.
Do you agree, I asked?
"Yes. That's the general expectation by consumers," said Yoshida. "They purchase physical form, they want to use it everywhere, right? So that's my expectation."
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
Here's another possible difference:
http://gimmegimmegames.com/2013/05/micr ... for-games/
It's an old rumor, but PS4 was rumored to have 50% more compute units than the new Xbox One. That could be wrong, but it could also be right.
Some programmers have already envisioned a situation further in the life of each console where new game designs demand more out of each platform than the processing (CPUs and GPUs) alone can provide, so 8GB versus 5GB might well mean that the PS4 will be able to get away with considerably more in the way of precomputed assets, freeing up more time for the CPUs and GPUs to do work. And, even ignoring that, a 3GB difference in available RAM would mean that the PS4 will simply have more space to work with assets.
http://gimmegimmegames.com/2013/05/micr ... for-games/
It's an old rumor, but PS4 was rumored to have 50% more compute units than the new Xbox One. That could be wrong, but it could also be right.
Some programmers have already envisioned a situation further in the life of each console where new game designs demand more out of each platform than the processing (CPUs and GPUs) alone can provide, so 8GB versus 5GB might well mean that the PS4 will be able to get away with considerably more in the way of precomputed assets, freeing up more time for the CPUs and GPUs to do work. And, even ignoring that, a 3GB difference in available RAM would mean that the PS4 will simply have more space to work with assets.
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
@Ed
http://shmups.system11.org/viewtopic.ph ... 79#p913279
-
In other news some are beginning to realize that there are privacy concerns:
The Xbox One will always be listening to you, in your own home
And this is hilarious:
Xbox One: live TV available in US only at launch, requires separate device
So Xbox One is not "one device that does everything". Xboned.
http://shmups.system11.org/viewtopic.ph ... 79#p913279
-
In other news some are beginning to realize that there are privacy concerns:
The Xbox One will always be listening to you, in your own home
And this is hilarious:
Xbox One: live TV available in US only at launch, requires separate device
So Xbox One is not "one device that does everything". Xboned.
Last edited by Friendly on Wed May 22, 2013 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
Thanks, that's in line with what I saw elsewhere about the PS4 having 50% more compute units (in its GPU, I took it to mean).
I also miswrote the above - the difference in RAM available to games might be 2GB.
I also miswrote the above - the difference in RAM available to games might be 2GB.
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
The most important difference is their bandwidth: Xbone's DDR3 RAM has 68.3 GB/s while PS4's GDDR5 RAM has 176.0 GB/s.Ed Oscuro wrote:Thanks, that's in line with what I saw elsewhere about the PS4 having 50% more compute units (in its GPU, I took it to mean).
I also miswrote the above - the difference in RAM available to games might be 2GB.
Looks like Microsoft was totally blindsided by this because PS4's early specs had only 2GB. Now they are saying: "We purposefully did not target the highest end graphics" (actual MS quote)
Sure you didn't.
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
Well, looking at a bit of reading on the subject, the faster main memory will allow fast writes - however, so will the Xbox One's memory model with a small cache. So back to the size of the memory - this does matter. PS4 might be able to better implement something like iD Software's megatexturing than the highly cache-reliant Xbox One, working more efficiently and transparently with large data sets without requiring a lot of reads.
Also, having fast bandwidth between two components isn't the whole story. When you've got 2 or 3 extra gigabytes to play with, that gives much more flexibility to stream data from slow data sources (optical disk, hard drive, internet) or the simple ability to load more at once when you start. In these cases, 68GB/s of bandwidth is not going to be an issue - space is. And more loads into and out of a smaller size memory from slower sources will be noticed.
This might not seem like such a big deal at launch, but if the scenario outlined by some programmers comes true - developers using RAM to hold precomputed assets as much as possible to free up the CPU and GPU for unavoidable realtime tasks, like advanced rendering or agent calculations - having the ability to load that extra 2GB will pay off.
If what's being said is true, I expect the One will end up completely outclassed in all areas quite quickly, of course. I find it astonishing that Microsoft thinks eating up a third or more of a limited games console's memory for the OS is acceptable...but it wouldn't be Microsoft if the OS wasn't bloated, would it?
Also, having fast bandwidth between two components isn't the whole story. When you've got 2 or 3 extra gigabytes to play with, that gives much more flexibility to stream data from slow data sources (optical disk, hard drive, internet) or the simple ability to load more at once when you start. In these cases, 68GB/s of bandwidth is not going to be an issue - space is. And more loads into and out of a smaller size memory from slower sources will be noticed.
This might not seem like such a big deal at launch, but if the scenario outlined by some programmers comes true - developers using RAM to hold precomputed assets as much as possible to free up the CPU and GPU for unavoidable realtime tasks, like advanced rendering or agent calculations - having the ability to load that extra 2GB will pay off.
If what's being said is true, I expect the One will end up completely outclassed in all areas quite quickly, of course. I find it astonishing that Microsoft thinks eating up a third or more of a limited games console's memory for the OS is acceptable...but it wouldn't be Microsoft if the OS wasn't bloated, would it?
-
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:00 am
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
well, we need to get the full details of what the PS4 memory usage is - i'll eat my hat if all 8gb or GDDR5 is for gaming only, i suspect you're going to get a (hopefully smaller) chunk for a persistant lightweight cross iOS set of functions.
That might ultimately be where some big differences occur but for people who want the gaming box just for gaming? Seems like Sony are going to be the way to go.
Or ,of course, a PC.
That might ultimately be where some big differences occur but for people who want the gaming box just for gaming? Seems like Sony are going to be the way to go.
Or ,of course, a PC.
"It's really the only sensible thing to do, if its done safely. Therapeutically there's no danger involved."
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
lmao that was amazing xDFriendly wrote:
RegalSin wrote:America also needs less Pale and Char Coal looking people and more Tan skinned people since tthis will eliminate the diffrence between dark and light.
Where could I E-mail or mail to if I want to address my ideas and Opinions?
-
Lord Satori
- Posts: 2061
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 5:39 pm
Re: PS4 - Holiday 2013 Launch (Playstation4)
sony doesn't charge you for psn. sony wins.
BryanM wrote:You're trapped in a haunted house. There's a ghost. It wants to eat your friends and have sex with your cat. When forced to decide between the lives of your friends and the chastity of your kitty, you choose the cat.
-
shmuppyLove
- Posts: 3708
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:44 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
I saw that one coming a mile away. It says "North America" but I doubt we'll get TV support even here in Canada. And even then, it will probably only be from one specific provider and only with a special (read: more expensive) service plan.Friendly wrote: And this is hilarious:
Xbox One: live TV available in US only at launch, requires separate device
So Xbox One is not "one device that does everything". Xboned.
IT WILL PLAY GAMES THOUGH, RITE?
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
Call of Sports
-
BareKnuckleRoo
- Posts: 6657
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 4:01 am
- Location: Southern Ontario
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
the TV series! Now out on Netflix.Ed Oscuro wrote:Call of Sports
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
Just a thought but this could actually turn out really well for core gamers, especially if MS can secure exclusives on EA sports stuff. We would see the frat bros and casuals overwhelmingly flock to Microsoft, leaving Sony with no option but to target the core demographic more directly. Maybe this new box will just help us split gaming into two distinct markets, and we can all just happily forget about the Xbox and its community just like we don't pay any attention to the social gaming community.
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
But frat bros learn their ways in college, and there will be many unhappy brothers once they discover they can't just take their discs along, but must instead schlep a huge DVR-like set-top box.
-
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 7:27 am
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
MS first target was to put DDR4 on the box but since is quite expensive and is still not available in high quantities they went down with the cheaper DDR3 hoping that the 32 MB of edram will do magical things. If they only put 64MB instead of 32 that would be another different story.Friendly wrote:The most important difference is their bandwidth: Xbone's DDR3 RAM has 68.3 GB/s while PS4's GDDR5 RAM has 176.0 GB/s.Ed Oscuro wrote:Thanks, that's in line with what I saw elsewhere about the PS4 having 50% more compute units (in its GPU, I took it to mean).
I also miswrote the above - the difference in RAM available to games might be 2GB.
Looks like Microsoft was totally blindsided by this because PS4's early specs had only 2GB. Now they are saying: "We purposefully did not target the highest end graphics" (actual MS quote)
Sure you didn't.
By the way, the mandatory 24h connection is just hilarious. So if you don't connect that Big Toast then we can't play???? Sighs
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
One way to crack the Japanese market.BIL wrote:Should've gone with "dick in a box."
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Re: PS4 - Holiday 2013 Launch (Playstation4)
Didn't work that way last time around.Lord Satori wrote:sony doesn't charge you for psn. sony wins.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
Re: PS4 - Holiday 2013 Launch (Playstation4)
Pan left...stop...make a hard copy right there, because I've got a hard copy right hereDrachenherz wrote:They exist. You just don't know... yet.system11 wrote:I'm feeling sort of scammed by science that these don't exist yet.BryanM wrote:$500.
For $500 in 2013, I expect a hot android wife.
Don't worry, Rick Deckard to the rescue!!!

-
Stormwatch
- Posts: 2327
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: Brazil
- Contact:
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
Holy shit, 3GB RAM for the OS? And what for... 

Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
That comic loses all its momentum in the last panels. Good version? What good version?
-
Super Laydock
- Posts: 3094
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:24 pm
- Location: Latis / Netherlands
Re: PS4 - Holiday 2013 Launch (Playstation4)
Yes it did! (PS3 recently passed X360 in total global sales)Skykid wrote:Didn't work that way last time around.Lord Satori wrote:sony doesn't charge you for psn. sony wins.
Took some time though, but then again the 360 had quite a head start.
Barroom hero!
Bathroom hero!
Bathroom hero!
Re: PS4 - Holiday 2013 Launch (Playstation4)
But not in revenue. Think about it.Super Laydock wrote:Yes it did! (PS3 recently passed X360 in total global sales)Skykid wrote:Didn't work that way last time around.Lord Satori wrote:sony doesn't charge you for psn. sony wins.
Took some time though, but then again the 360 had quite a head start.
Always outnumbered, never outgunned - No zuo no die
ChurchOfSolipsism wrote: ALso, this is how SKykid usually posts
-
charlie chong
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 12:19 pm
- Location: borders
Re: PS4 - Holiday 2013 Launch (Playstation4)
Friendly wrote:Yeah, I'd say I'm pretty fair. At least I try to be.

SLAG OFF KETSUI I SLAG OFF YOR MUM
https://soundcloud.com/vapor-teh-apparition
https://soundcloud.com/don-pachi-aka-bling-laden
https://soundcloud.com/vapor-teh-apparition
https://soundcloud.com/don-pachi-aka-bling-laden
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
Really, using the xbox to control your cable requires you to be able to plug your cable box into the xbox, what a fucking surprise. MS may be doing some incredibly stupid things, but between their pr people giving conflicting half answers, and the (shit) game media trying to sensationalize anything they can, half the information floating around right now is just fud. It doesn't make for good headlines, but the real answer to so many things about both the xbox and ps4 is "we don't know, there hasn't been enough information released yet."Friendly wrote: And this is hilarious:
Xbox One: live TV available in US only at launch, requires separate device
So Xbox One is not "one device that does everything". Xboned.
XBL - CountryGolden


-
O. Van Bruce
- Posts: 1623
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:50 pm
- Location: On an alternate dimension... filled with bullets and moon runes...
Re: PS4 - Holiday 2013 Launch (Playstation4)
Skykid... do you really think that's important? I mean, no gamer cares about the money a console gives to its manufacturer: it's all about the games and the 360 had a very good starting sprint but lost the marathon to the PS3 in terms of games.Skykid wrote:But not in revenue. Think about it.Super Laydock wrote:Yes it did! (PS3 recently passed X360 in total global sales)Skykid wrote:
Didn't work that way last time around.
Took some time though, but then again the 360 had quite a head start.
He may be a fanboy but he definetely isn't a delusive fanboy...charlie chong wrote:Friendly wrote:Yeah, I'd say I'm pretty fair. At least I try to be.
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
Yes, but the point is that Microsoft had plenty of time to prepare all of the answers and didn't deliver. They are solely at fault. The whole presentation seemed as if they were locked up in a basement for several months without access to any media, totally oblivious of what is going on.t0yrobo wrote: half the information floating around right now is just fud
Re: Xbox 3 = Xbox One: "This is rocket science stuff"
Totally true. They probably should've marketed this event as being multimedia focused and invited everyone to see them at E3 for game news. Their pr people really blew it, I don't think they ever had any intention of going much into specifics and were totally unprepared for it. Which wouldn't have been so bad if they haven't been handling it so poorly.matrigs wrote:Yes, but the point is that Microsoft had plenty of time to prepare all of the answers and didn't deliver. They are solely at fault. The whole presentation seemed as if they were locked up in a basement for several months without access to any media, totally oblivious of what is going on.t0yrobo wrote: half the information floating around right now is just fud
XBL - CountryGolden

