Ganelon wrote:I'm hoping for a new story myself; thinking back on the weeks and months leading up to The Phantom Menace, nothing beats the excitement of a new story.

Ganelon wrote:I'm hoping for a new story myself; thinking back on the weeks and months leading up to The Phantom Menace, nothing beats the excitement of a new story.
Disney animation WAS exploitative. The direct-to-dvd sequels happened when Eisner was CEO. After Pixar took over, the first thing Lasseter did was to kill the cheap sequels; and god bless him for that.njiska wrote:Disney Animation may be exploitative when it comes to Direct-to-dvd sequels, but the fact of the matter is that the company is very big on archiving, restoration and preservation. They are far more likely to release the original versions of the film in a high quality format than George Lucas ever would. When it comes to new films, you need to remember that Disney is also the parent company of a lot of production houses that produce great films. Pulp Fiction was the first film greenlit by Miramax after being purchased by Disney. So I trust Disney to do a better job then George has.xbl0x180 wrote:I wouldn't trust Disney to "save" any significant work of art.njiska wrote:Worth it just for ILM and Skywalker Sound. I think the Lucasfilm side may have been less important.
Maybe they can save Star Wars from George?
You can be 100% positive that Disney will re-release the original SW trilogy on Blu-Ray that the fans have been clamoring ever since the Blu-Ray format came into existence (fully restored to it's former glory with frame-by-frame restoration -- how long that'll take, with Disney's deep & vast monetary pockets, it's a given/no-brainer to go with this particular BR release). I'd buy it if were available today or a few years from now quite easily.njiska wrote:Disney Animation may be exploitative when it comes to Direct-to-dvd sequels, but the fact of the matter is that the company is very big on archiving, restoration and preservation. They are far more likely to release the original versions of the film in a high quality format than George Lucas ever would. When it comes to new films, you need to remember that Disney is also the parent company of a lot of production houses that produce great films. Pulp Fiction was the first film greenlit by Miramax after being purchased by Disney. So I trust Disney to do a better job then George has.xbl0x180 wrote:I wouldn't trust Disney to "save" any significant work of art.njiska wrote:Worth it just for ILM and Skywalker Sound. I think the Lucasfilm side may have been less important.
Maybe they can save Star Wars from George?
Too bad there is a 30 year gap between the production of VI and VII. I know we all would have liked to see more of Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford and Carrie Fisher as Luke, Han and Leia.PC Engine Fan X! wrote:further adventures of Skywalker and Co.
What do you mean? The original actors are too old. It's not really a matter of who directs this. Unless you recreate them using 100% CGI; though I don't think we're quite there yet.PC Engine Fan X! wrote:If the new SW sequels could return to their former glory of the original SW trilogy, with some big-name directors and screenwriters, it's do-able/possible.
PC Engine Fan X! ^_~
I meant was, if the next three SW sequel could in terms of having a sly (or sarcastic) sense of humor, the tight pacing of one scene into the next, etc. -- hallmarks of the original trilogy that the new sequels would have (was sorely lacking with the three SW prequels indeed).Friendly wrote:What do you mean? The original actors are too old. It's not really a matter of who directs this. Unless you recreate them using 100% CGI; though I don't think we're quite there yet.PC Engine Fan X! wrote:If the new SW sequels could return to their former glory of the original SW trilogy, with some big-name directors and screenwriters, it's do-able/possible.
PC Engine Fan X! ^_~
Have you seen Avatar?replayme wrote: James Cameron
BIL wrote: "Small sack, LOTS OF CUM" - Nikola Tesla
I don't think Cameron would be a particularly bad choice for Star Wars (even the originals were popcorn flicks), but he has stated he's not in the movie business anymore. He's in the Avatar business. Fincher would get my vote even though I'm not so gaga over his recent stuff. Still not bad though. Nolan would make sure it's scored well... something I felt was missing from the prequels (amongst a myriad of other things).Friendly wrote:Have you seen Avatar?replayme wrote: James Cameron
Not so sure about Spielberg, either. I think he may have lost his touch, too.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
SHMUP sale page.Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
BIL wrote: "Small sack, LOTS OF CUM" - Nikola Tesla
Luke wasn't black?drauch wrote: And Luke could be black.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
Whoever directed The Empire Strikes Back needs to direct MOARreplayme wrote:If I was to think of directors for the new and upcoming trilogy, I would think of the following as being my first choice:
Christopher Nolan
James Cameron
David Fincher
If the aforementioned directors weren't available, I'd say the following would also make a good choice - but ONLY if the aforementioned weren't available:
Peter Jackson
JJ Abrams
Sam Raimi
Steven Spielberg
I think 1 director per movie would also be a really neat idea.
Unless Disney is in the Zombie business, that's not gonna hapen. Kershner died two years ago (aged 87).xbl0x180 wrote: Whoever directed The Empire Strikes Back needs to direct MOAR
Well, if you look at Disney's labor of love with it's frame-by-frame restoration project with Sleeping Beauty and how much time and money it took to get it done right the first time, the same type of restoration could be applied for the original trilogy (consider that they now own all the original SW trilogy 35mm prints reels indeed from the 35mm print reel storage vault).TransatlanticFoe wrote:This can only be good news - Lucas was happy to get Star Wars rot, ignoring the expanded universe, delaying the live action TV series for bullshit reasons and generally happy to re-issue the original trilogy with minor changes every few years.
With the wealth of expanded universe material, the Thrawn Trilogy would be the logical place to pick up. With a half-decent director and writing team, it can't be as terrible as the prequels surely?
Disney won't help on the DVD/BluRay front though. They love sitting on things for years and putting out overpriced limited run releases. All anyone really wants is the original, unaltered, trilogy on a better format than the 4:3 "widescreen" laserdisc transfers. So wait for next Christmas probably!
The more I think about this, the more awesome it sounds.RGC wrote:Wes Anderson all the way.
Huh? The score was the only good part of the prequels, even if it was 90% recycled.GaijinPunch wrote:Nolan would make sure it's scored well... something I felt was missing from the prequels (amongst a myriad of other things).
SHMUP sale page.Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!