mesh control wrote:Next up:
goooodddbye sleep.
I ought to pick up Brief History of Time again. Warning though, apparently some of the things in that book are either not quite right or actually incomprehensible - so I've heard.
I've wanted to pick up Chandler and some others from the hardboiled genre, but especially the Nero Wolfe stories. I did find some episodes of the A&E television version, but I'm not sure it really works, yet.
Ugh, I don't really want to admit it, but I have blown through the first three stories in the Anita Blake series (which is fucking huge) in record time. Almost done with the third. Hopefully I can put that to rest. I have to admit, it's a weird series, but surprisingly has a lot to recommend it. Unfortunately, the actual writing is not great. If you have a copy of Strunk & White's handbook, in a recent (ish) edition, the example of the obnoxiously boisterous writer is a lot closer to the style of writing. Still, I'm not annoyed by the constant tics because they give the story character. You're reading a 40-year old woman writing as if she was a badass 24-year-old zombie animator and monster exterminator who gets to humiliate annoying tough guy stereotypes and said monsters. I would say it's a guilty pleasure but I don't feel too guilty about it. Only a little. Also, the author is definitely gun-right friendly. There are lots of strange holes in it; it basically takes the modern day but adds backstory of the history of human / monster interactions going back throughout time, and the two don't really fit well. Saying the world would be essentially the same with monsters doesn't really make sense to me. It was carried off pretty well in the first story with some references to specialized legislation (the US is apparently the only state that recognizes vampires as having at least some rights of persons) but now it's starting to juxtapose against what we would have expected to happen, and the modifications to a description of the real world just make that stand out the more.
Also been trying to get through a few more serious books, including Warmth Disperses and Time Passes, a nice history of thermodynamics. It annoys me that I am able to question the characterization of the history of science up to and including Galileo, enough that I wonder about the book in general. That was just in passing, though; otherwise it seems extremely well researched and accurate.