Estebang wrote:
I guess Skykid needs my last post dumbed down for him
Er... I don't. Just reworded. EDIT: You omitted a character and it made it confusing on first read.
Estebang wrote:Also, I'm interested in knowing what two different genres you would put God of War and DMC in.
Which point of the thread did you start reading from?

Look up:
Skykid wrote:GOW doesn't really stand up to NG or Bayonetta as a combat game... GOW is superior imo as an adventure experience, large-scale production.
So DMC would be skill-based combat, GOW cinematic action adventure.
Estebang wrote:I played about half of God of War 2 before I realized there was no reason to keep going.
GOW2 is a solid 8 on a scale of 10. It's not the greatest thing to ever happen to gaming and not as profound as the original, but it's well designed and perfectly playable. Ragging on popular and successful games doesn't make anyone come off as smart unless they have really valid points. The review you linked makes none, it's just "ZOMG it's not Japanese like God Hand" (also in a different genre) and its relative simplicity is not to his tastes.
You seem to think that a person is an idiot if they don't want a video game to treat them like one.
GOW is dumb fun, but it's well made dumb fun. There is some variety to the combat and experimentation is available. Its repetitive, but no more so than DMC or God Hand. In fact, owing to its set pieces, attention to detail, scope and plot threads, it has plenty to experience alongside the button mashing.
Now
"No. This is not what videogames are. I give God of War 2 zero stars because I do not play videogames to numb the pleasure centers of my brain. And I certainly do not pay fifty dollars for the privilege."
- You'd have to be a retard with no eyes and thumbs to award GOW2 zero stars.
- If you consider something to be a negative then it can't possibly be a "privilege."
Stupid review, please stop posting them.