NINTENDOGS BYTCH!!!!!!!! IS OUT!!!!!

ThirdStrike · Post by **ThirdStrike** » Sat Aug 13, 2005 6:30 am

Who is buying Nintendogs on august 23rd? I am buying this game with the sole purpose of showing stupid girls they do not need $2000 dollar puppies that crap everywhere. For $180 buy a Nintendo DS and this game for your girlfriend. I am sure just like any puppy she will just lose interest after a little bit of time

NINTENDOGS BYTCH

A Crappy video for this game

http://www.extremefunnypictures.com/funnypic636.htm

Skyline · Post by **Skyline** » Sat Aug 13, 2005 7:22 am

I suppose when playing this game on the go, it'll be proper to scream "YOU'RE MY BITCH!!!" at the screen?

Monkey_Man · Post by **Monkey_Man** » Sat Aug 13, 2005 7:29 am

"hey dog, look at me opening the door, oh look I am turning the doorknob, oh wow the door is moving know, isn't it fucking awesome?"
"BARK"

UnscathedFlyingObject · Sat Aug 13, 2005 7:35 am

I wonder if they have a slap command or something (pummel, kick, drop from second floor.) Gotta teach those bastards not to mess around the boss

.

TWITCHDOCTOR · Post by **TWITCHDOCTOR** » Sat Aug 13, 2005 7:46 am

I'm offended here!
I keep snakes as "pets", not dogs. I wanna play a game from Microsoft called "MicroSnakes"!!!! WTF?

BIG · Post by **BIG** » Sat Aug 13, 2005 1:54 pm

If you buy Nintendogs,chances are,you're probably:

A. a female.
B. a closet homo.
C. a screaming Nancy of a man.

B-

iatneH · Post by **iatneH** » Sat Aug 13, 2005 2:46 pm

BIG wrote:If you buy Nintendogs,chances are,you're probably:

A. a female.
B. a closet homo.
C. a screaming Nancy of a man.
D. a brainwashed Nintendo fanboy.

A lot of the hype seems to be from Nintendo fans who will buy anything made by Nintendo, but also ONLY buy things made by Nintendo. After I was disappointed again and again (ahem N64 and onwards), at least I can see that not everything that says "Nintendo" on it is instantly pure gold.

I got bored of my DS about a week after getting it. Not even Nanostray could save my interest for more than 3 days. I can't see the appeal in this puppy game either. I might be a little biased since I DESPISE dogs that aren't seeing-eye dogs or police dogs (i.e. useful).

Elixir · Post by **Elixir** » Sat Aug 13, 2005 4:37 pm

Holy god, that's surprisingly realistic.

...do they die?

The n00b · Post by **The n00b** » Sat Aug 13, 2005 4:44 pm

I have had enough of the tamagotchi craze so not me.

steveovig · Post by **steveovig** » Sat Aug 13, 2005 7:44 pm

I'll probably pick up the version with the Shelties in it when I decide to buy a DS later this year. It looks fun.

BIG · Post by **BIG** » Sat Aug 13, 2005 8:48 pm

steveovig wrote:I'll probably pick up the version with the Shelties in it when I decide to buy a DS later this year. It looks fun.

Believe me,N-Dogs isn't even a game...it's tea-time in disguise

I give you fair warning,beware!

B-

Super Laydock · Post by **Super Laydock** » Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:11 pm

iatneH wrote: I might be a little biased since I DESPISE dogs that aren't seeing-eye dogs or police dogs (i.e. useful).

You just reassured yourself a place on my "list"!

@Big: well maybe I am individual enough as a man to confess that I am REALLY looking forward to this game. Man that are unable/unwilling to acknowledge that they like cute/friendly animals are the the real closet homos. One's got to stand for what one likes, or be an unworthy being instead.

Tomtom · Post by **Tomtom** » Sun Aug 14, 2005 1:09 am

I like dogs, but digital ones...I don't know. The lack of feces is overrun by the lack of reality.

And ThirdStrike, I didn't know that was you the other night, good to finally have an identity for the guy who's been on my AIM buddy list for over a year

BIG · Post by **BIG** » Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:01 am

Super Laydock wrote:
@Big: well maybe I am individual enough as a man to confess that I am REALLY looking forward to this game. Man that are unable/unwilling to acknowledge that they like cute/friendly animals are the the real closet homos. One's got to stand for what one likes, or be an unworthy being instead.

Thefunny thing is,I actually do like REAL animals,even the not-so-cute ones.

Digital pets are for the birds.

B-

TWITCHDOCTOR · Post by **TWITCHDOCTOR** » Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:36 am

Digital Pets? Yes...thats just how the "not so great" future will be.
Everyone is now too dependant on computers these days.
People can't even take care of an animal(pet) any more...only as long as its a "virtual pet".
How about "virtual parents" then? Well, we already have that, its called the internet.
Its bad enough that cars are computer controlled, but we really don't need digital pets, thanks anyway...

Cyber Punk ain't all "that"!

Excuse me, I'm off now to wack off with my "Trance Vibrator", because thanks to the puter age, I no longer need a girlfriend.
If only I could survive by consuming(eating) my "junk" email...God, I would NEVER starve!!! (In fact, I'd be one fat-assed mother fooker)

All with much thanks to Maxx Headroom...

"Here's another one for ya"...

The n00b · Post by **The n00b** » Sun Aug 14, 2005 2:27 pm

Super Laydock wrote:
iatneH wrote: I might be a little biased since I DESPISE dogs that aren't seeing-eye dogs or police dogs (i.e. useful).

You just reassured yourself a place on my "list"!

@Big: well maybe I am individual enough as a man to confess that I am REALLY looking forward to this game. Man that are unable/unwilling to acknowledge that they like cute/friendly animals are the the real closet homos. One's got to stand for what one likes, or be an unworthy being instead.

GRRRR I'M A MAN! As a man I am very willing to acknowledge that Nintendogs is in no way original. Nintendogs is just a graphical update of the Tomagotchi craze from a couple years back. I also think the only reason people are giving it the time of day is because of the big fat Nintendo label slapped on the side. If Sega or Microsoft devved this game, we wouldn't even be discussing it. Now I've got to go watch some football, have sex with dozens of women, and eat tons of pork rinds BECAUSE I'M A MAN!

Damn I forgot to add that Tomagotchi was REALLY gay. As far as I know, Seaman was the only digipet that could be played by men.

jp · Post by jp » Sun Aug 14, 2005 5:29 pm

I think Nintendogs' appeal comes from:
A. Very good AI.
B. Very impressive graphics.
C. Pick up and play style gameplay.

Now, I haven't played it, and I probably won't. But, I can see why someone would buy it as it is an impressive feat for the DS graphically.

BIG · Post by **BIG** » Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:03 pm

Imo,Nintendogs is a great tech-demo for the DS...nothing more.

And yes,I've played it first hand at E3.

B-

TVG · Post by **TVG** » Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:26 pm

LOL TEH TOPIC TITLE IS A PUN LOL ROFLEMAYO

sven666 · Post by **sven666** » Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:26 pm

TWITCHDOCTOR wrote:I'm offended here!
I keep snakes as "pets", not dogs. I wanna play a game from Microsoft called "MicroSnakes"!!!! WTF?

stop playing with your snake in public!!

seriously i never understood peoples affection for tamagotchis and pokemons and such crap..

Andi · Post by **Andi** » Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:33 pm

The quetion is, why isn't there this much outrage against harvest moon around here?

Taking care of digital dogs sucks, but digital vegetables don't even fucking bark.

Elixir · Post by **Elixir** » Mon Aug 15, 2005 6:11 pm

Andi wrote:The quetion is, why isn't there this much outrage against harvest moon around here?

Taking care of digital dogs sucks, but digital vegetables don't even fucking bark.

That's because vegetables don't try to ♥ ♥ ♥ you back, like they're trying to do with these.

It's artificial, but it's quite a genious idea. Same thing's going to happen in real life, you know. Aww, did rover die? Would you like to remake?

BrianC · Post by **BrianC** » Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:49 pm

iatneH wrote:
BIG wrote:If you buy Nintendogs,chances are,you're probably:

A. a female.
B. a closet homo.
C. a screaming Nancy of a man.
D. a brainwashed Nintendo fanboy.
A lot of the hype seems to be from Nintendo fans who will buy anything made by Nintendo, but also ONLY buy things made by Nintendo. After I was disappointed again and again (ahem N64 and onwards), at least I can see that not everything that says "Nintendo" on it is instantly pure gold.

I got bored of my DS about a week after getting it. Not even Nanostray could save my interest for more than 3 days. I can't see the appeal in this puppy game either. I might be a little biased since I DESPISE dogs that aren't seeing-eye dogs or police dogs (i.e. useful).

Actually, much of the hype is from probably from people that played and like the game for the right reasons. How do you know that the game wouldn't be just as hyped on other systems? This game seems to have quite a bit in the way of mini games and interactivity too.

FatCobra · Post by **FatCobra** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:47 pm

The demo had me hooked. It was cute watching the dogs interact with you and each other. Yes, I am a guy, I happen to love dogs. Besides, I could use a good "tea-time" game. Gotta take a break from blasting space aliens and saving the universe, right?

Here's a good question for all of you: How many of you admit to playing Pokémon games? Bonus points if you've played the non-RPG ones as well.

Post by **BulletMagnet** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:49 pm

FatCobra wrote:Here's a good question for all of you: How many of you admit to playing Pokémon games? Bonus points if you've played the non-RPG ones as well.

I played the red/blue versions pretty extensively back in the day (managed to catch all 151 of the buggers), but haven't played any of the more recent ones, yellow included. I've also played a little of Puzzle League, Stadium and Snap on the N64, but that's about it.

ThirdStrike · Post by **ThirdStrike** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:39 pm

Did anyone buy this?

JBC · Post by **JBC** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:42 pm

I played the preview of the game at wally-world and couldn't help but notice that they included the arsehole on the puppies. What's up with that?

Post by **BulletMagnet** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:49 pm

Methinks most any pet owner will tell you that as a pet owner one spends a great deal of time, unwilling as it may be, getting acquainted with the business end of your pet's digestive system (or, more accurately, its products and their subsequent and hasty removal). For better or for worse I guess the thing is accurate, heh...haven't played it myself though.

ThirdStrike · Post by **ThirdStrike** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:51 pm

circuitface wrote:I played the preview of the game at wally-world and couldn't help but notice that they included the arsehole on the puppies. What's up with that?

I guess to be realistic

But that is kind of sick

JBC · Post by **JBC** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:55 pm

I felt kinda wierd about it because you can pet the dogs and they react to your petting depending on where you're petting them. I wonder...

Like, here's the dog -

- bawoooo!!!