Skykid wrote:
Lolz, yeah maybe. That said the underground manga industry has been catering for ultra-violent (see: horrific) pornography (guro, snuff whatever) since forever. I'm sure plenty of foreigners make beelines for that stuff when they hit Tokyo, like it's some kind of forbidden fruit.
I can add that I can be silent on this, and my silence would be telling. Nevertheless: with the right contacts, Gaijins can access to some really twisted stuff, say, live versions of the things I mention in the previous post.
Oh, and on the whole question of a covert police state being correlated to a powerful economy (you aasked this one a bit before):
...Not really. Someone like Stiglitz or Rifkin studied the phenomenon. To cut a long story short, a dictatorial-like state (or just a dictatorship) don't give any further any impulse to strong productivity than a free democracy, where people are self-motivated to produce a lot. A clear legislation is perhaps the strongest factor, and it becomes very relevant when a country transits from an industrial to a purely tertiary economy. This is the top-down part (from government to citizens).
From experience, Netherlands and Singapore are countries in which you compile 10 minutes of modules and you can open a shop, and get money quickly. Both countries have
public services that collect citizens' complaints on useless red tape, and analyze how to
simplify legislation. This makes the handling of any commercial activity, from small to big, much smoother, i.e. more productive.
Being small is also quite useful: small countries with simple, efficient systems are always advantaged, because they can offer good services with small expense. See above. But a government can also channel most energies in one place. Isn't the Tokyo conglomerate at, like, 30+M citizens, with another 30+M or so within 1 hour of train? The Essen conglomerate in Germany, and basically the whole of NL are similar.
For the bottom-up part (citizens to government): the question is whether is fear and control, or motivation and drive to earn, the best drive for citizens. There seems not to be crucial evidence in either direction. Pre-WII II Germany and post-WWII should have had similar rates of production (you shouldn't trust my bad memory on this), but people had different, very different reasons to perform.
Bottom line, if money is a key goal, types of government may not be relevant to reach this goal.
And, since you just posted, Moniker:
Randorama wrote:Are you seriously this brain-dead?
As far as I am concerned, your posts in this thread have been disturbing, because you contradicted yourself too much, certainly without ill will. If we put them together, it sounds like you're a headless chook, and that would be quite surprising.
As I am somewhat of a Chomskian, I think that people can be quite smart (i.e. their intellectual
competence is high), but their contigent words may not show this (i.e. their intellectual
performance is low). So, if you string several post that seem to originate from poor performance, the
rhetorical question above arises in my head.
My posts may be so acid and bilious they could tear down concrete, but I'd rather post those than some artificial, "nice" comments on how everybody should get along and all the places are nice. Vitriol has never killed anyone and is not illegal.
"The only desire the Culture could not satisfy from within itself was one common to both the descendants of its original human stock and the machines [...]: the urge not to feel useless."
I.M. Banks, "Consider Phlebas" (1988: 43).