

Good one.louisg wrote:Maybe they learned their lesson from Sega Rally 2
That's probably true, and reinforced by what I've seen (crapola like No More Heroes, or the somewhat underperforming Sega lightgun ports to the Wii). When we think of good Japanese game programming post-16-bit, it's generally limited to arcade games and ports, and excluding KonamiObiwanshinobi wrote:These days Japanese programmers don't seem to have any edge left over western ones, be it know how or ethos. Some of the fastest and smoothest last gen arcade racers (Burnouts, Jak X) are western. This gen Wipeouts and Burnout Paradise - games made in the UK - are where it's at. Moreover, when BP came out for the PC, it was arguably its ultimate version.
Companies like Midway with 30 fps Hydro Thunder Hurricane (decade-old PC port of the first one performs better, mind you) and Sega with Sonic & Sega All-Stars Racing (don't know about the retail versions, but demo had performance issues pretty bad for a racer, not even particulary good looking at that) seem to have lost interest in pleasing people raised in the arcades.
VOOT, Outrun online, and Afterburner Climax XBLA ports were great though. But looks like we won't be seeing more stuff of that caliber :/neorichieb1971 wrote:Sega don't have the talent anymore. Sad that a whole industry will fall with them.
XB360 and PS3 could emulate Model 2 at 60fps so its no excuse really.
That's awesome news! I liked SR1 a lot, but wasn't as much of a fan of the handling in 2 (didn't play the later ones; they looked more sim-like)antares wrote:I think this game is worth buying for one important reason: It feels like Sega Rally! I played this with my Racing Wheel and the handling is very close to the Sega Rally arcade games.
Damn Tim, you know there are quite a few Americans out there who still lives in tents due to this shitty economy, and you're dropping loads on a single game which only last 20 min. Do you think it's fair? How much did you spend this time?
Exactly what I'm wondering, especially after Taito had bothered to port the first three to PS2 (yep, it has the BGM from both of the first two and BG1's tracks are available to unlock).D wrote:Where´s Battle Gear 4 [2010 version]?
I dunno if thats still the case anymore, from the picture I get painted to me is that the UK games industry has been badly hit this generation, with studios closing or outsourcing to countries like Australia and Canada. Japanese Publishers like Sega and SquareEnix now own parts of the UK industry, so im hoping something good can come out of that marrageUK - are where it's at
It all went downhill when Bitmap Bros closed up shop, Psygnosis was bought out, and DMA became The GTA CompanyTrevHead (TVR) wrote:I dunno if thats still the case anymore, from the picture I get painted to me is that the UK games industry has been badly hit this generation, with studios closing or outsourcing to countries like Australia and Canada. Japanese Publishers like Sega and SquareEnix now own parts of the UK industry, so im hoping something good can come out of that marrageUK - are where it's at
Still im an outsider who doesnt know that much, maybe someone in the know can tell me if im correct in what im saying?
And RARE spend all their time on vacation on Microsoft expenses.louisg wrote:It all went downhill when Bitmap Bros closed up shop, Psygnosis was bought out, and DMA became The GTA CompanyTrevHead (TVR) wrote:I dunno if thats still the case anymore, from the picture I get painted to me is that the UK games industry has been badly hit this generation, with studios closing or outsourcing to countries like Australia and Canada. Japanese Publishers like Sega and SquareEnix now own parts of the UK industry, so im hoping something good can come out of that marrageUK - are where it's at
Still im an outsider who doesnt know that much, maybe someone in the know can tell me if im correct in what im saying?
We're not really online at the same time but I've been racing against your uploaded ghosts(you fast), checkout the time attack on the tropical stage timeGhegs wrote:Feel free to hit me up for some racin'.
Oh, sweet. I haven't really played Time Attack since starting the game, I've been spending most of the my time on multiplayer. Maybe an hour or so every day. The really good players seem to be doing only Time Attack though as I keep winning almost all my races...or maybe I'm just not online at the same time with them. Would be fun to race against you and Dandy_J and F40 online. Zaarock and nZero are good drivers too.trunk wrote:We're not really online at the same time but I've been racing against your uploaded ghosts(you fast), checkout the time attack on the tropical stage time
Dang...It's going to be hard beating the andorra racer. I decided I want to stick to regular cars for time attack. I had barely beaten your LancerGhegs wrote:Oh, sweet. I haven't really played Time Attack since starting the game, I've been spending most of the my time on multiplayer. Maybe an hour or so every day. The really good players seem to be doing only Time Attack though as I keep winning almost all my races...or maybe I'm just not online at the same time with them. Would be fun to race against you and Dandy_J and F40 online. Zaarock and nZero are good drivers too.trunk wrote:We're not really online at the same time but I've been racing against your uploaded ghosts(you fast), checkout the time attack on the tropical stage time
That said, I went and beat your time on Tropical.
whilst the PS3 has a fairly poor GPU, the Xenos should be able to match up there or there abouts to a -stock- 8800 with few corners cut. I doubt the 8 GB ram makes much difference and 3.4 GHz CPU Intel Pentium D 945 - this is pretty dated tech and the multi-cored PS3/X360 should have enough to match whatever it's doing.As for the XBLA/PSN version being 30FPS, the arcade version's hardware is above a Lindbergh. Sega Rally 3's Europa-R board has 8 GB of RAM and a dual core 3.4 GHz processor. The GPU is an Nvidia GeForce 8800 (which was rebranded later as GTS 240). I think this GPU may be a little above the current consoles. PS3's RSX is based on the GF7800.
The car thing is actually something I'm disappointed in - the Andorra is just too good. The Icelandic Racer is actually faster on straights, but it loses a lot more speed in corners. I thought they'd do it OOA-style where the cars have subtle differences (handling, how quickly they recover from drift, etc) but none is clearly the best. But here they put in the unlockable cars that are just plain god-tier. My main car is actually the Peugeot, I use only that in multiplayer. So when I do Time Attack in Andorra it takes a moment to get used to it since it's faster and corners better. Annoying. I just beat F40's time in Tropical with Icelandic Racer and there's no way in hell I'm the better driver. The fact that he can beat so many Andorra's and Icelandic's with the Celica just proves that the man's god-tier himself.trunk wrote:Dang...It's going to be hard beating the andorra racer. I decided I want to stick to regular cars for time attack. I had barely beaten your Lancer![]()
I raced F40 once or twice in OOA drafting helped alot with no collision so I could cover my mistakes and kinda keep up.
I did play online and the first day I beat everyone easily. The second time online I stayed competitive but I usually got second when somebody took one of the special cars (buggy,bowler,andorra,ice).
It's cool that you can race a ghost, that way we're racing passively if we're not both online. Do some more time attack so I have more ghosts to chase(preferably regular cars)
I agree, Outrun was great at balancing. SROA I feel did good with the regular cars in terms of balancing too. Unless there's something I'm not aware of.Ghegs wrote: The car thing is actually something I'm disappointed in - the Andorra is just too good. The Icelandic Racer is actually faster on straights, but it loses a lot more speed in corners. I thought they'd do it OOA-style where the cars have subtle differences (handling, how quickly they recover from drift, etc) but none is clearly the best. But here they put in the unlockable cars that are just plain god-tier.
The guy certainly has a knack for these driving games, but this does show that the bonus cars are that much more powerful. Speaking of the celica, are the 2 classic cars about the same as the regulars in terms of speed in this game?Ghegs wrote:My main car is actually the Peugeot, I use only that in multiplayer. So when I do Time Attack in Andorra it takes a moment to get used to it since it's faster and corners better. Annoying. I just beat F40's time in Tropical with Icelandic Racer and there's no way in hell I'm the better driver. The fact that he can beat so many Andorra's and Icelandic's with the Celica just proves that the man's god-tier himself.
I also saw in the championship leaderboards that the best times are 2 minutesGhegs wrote:The whole Time Attack is kind of broken anyway since there are glitched times on the leaderboards. On Tropical the first 31 submissions are glitched. At least you can still time attack against the rest, but it's still frustating. I don't think there's much hope for a patch that fixes the glitches, balances the unlockable cars against the WRC ones (or just bans them from Time Attack and maybe even multiplayer) and clears the Leaderboards...
I think most people have not unlocked all the cars yet and I believe the bowler was the easiest to get so it will probably show up more. I don't think I am good enough yet to notice the differences between wrc cars in this game. I main the Lancer because that's what I like, although I did feel that one of the wrc cars felt weaker than the others.Ghegs wrote:Oddly I've never raced against the Andorra online. Whenever I see people pick the unlockable cars they always go for the Bowler for some reason. And then I beat them anyway. With the Peugeot.
I played the psp version and it was not good at all. I have only briefly played revo on xbox.Ghegs wrote:Slightly off-topic, but do you/have you played Revo? Just curious if it's still worth getting and would work in giving me that Sega Rally fix, SROA's meager five stages are starting to feel limited.
I haven't played enough with them to make a rock solid statement, but I think they're about the same. They only have five gears as opposed to the regulars' six, I wonder if that's got something to do with F40 playing one.trunk wrote:Speaking of the celica, are the 2 classic cars about the same as the regulars in terms of speed in this game?
Oh, I didn't remember OOA got updates. Well, maybe SROA has some hope then, too. There is no catch enabled online nor is there slipstreaming or anything similar. I'm torn on whether I prefer it that way or not, slipstream is pretty fun in OOA and it doesn't break the game or anything. I'd be fine with keeping the unlockable cars available in multiplayer, but I would like to have a "WRC cars only"-checkbox available in that case.trunk wrote:OOA received patch updates so I don't see why SROA would be any different. Beyond glitches the ban from time attack would be the most I could ask for. I don't think there is catch up enabled online so keeping the special cars available helps people who have less skills.
The differences are pretty subtle but noticable. I'd say if you're whooping ass with one, you can whoop ass with any of them. I'm not sure why I ended up with the Peugeot, I actually like the Lancer better on a more personal level. But the Peugeot just feels slightly more agile to me.trunk wrote:I don't think I am good enough yet to notice the differences between wrc cars in this game. I main the Lancer because that's what I like, although I did feel that one of the wrc cars felt weaker than the others.
Thanks, good info there. Need to download the demo again and see how I like it this time.trunk wrote:F40 has some impressions of revo vs sroa on gamefaqs that might help your decision http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/620599-s ... e/59278099