llabnip wrote:jp wrote:llabnip wrote:
Anyway, reading a story on Lik-Sang about how they are being bullied by Sony is likely to be a bit one-sided. Few people know all the facts - but I'd bet both sides have valid points (free trade vs. product distribution rights). The law generally comes down on the side of the corporations.
Like Bleem?

In that case, the law didn't come down on anyone's side. Sony simply had deeper pockets and the Bleemcast folks couldn't sustain the financial drain of a long lawsuit. There was no telling what would have been the eventual decision handed down by the courts (I'm guessing the Bleemcast folks would have won but that's just a guess... I would have liked to see the Bleamcast folks win it).
I'm not saying I agree with the practice and I don't want to see import sales stunted. I'm just saying that one should use caution before passing judgement. All the major console makers have had territory lockouts on most of their systems (a few rare exceptions). All have been involved in lawsuits for copyright/trademark infringement. Sony, being the biggest of them all, is always highly visible when these things hit. They may have a legitimate case - I don't know all the facts (and the lik-sang article is very one-sided). It's highly likely to be more legitimate than some of the crap Nintendo did back in the day (sued by Sega and eventually won by Sega) where they forced companies to exclusive contracts, forced retailers to put Nintendo products at a certian advantage (including shelf height, location, posters, etc) over Sega's or else they might find their Super Mario Bros. 3 shipment a bit late in arriving to the store. There is a long history of this prior to Sony - but there is every possibility that this lawsuit
may have some grounding based on the rights they are entitled to for their products.
Thank you, let's quit the Sony-bashing. Nintendo was as bad or worse back in the day; at least Sony isn't trying to bully Microsoft and Nintendo out of the console business, like Nintendo tried to do with Sega.
I'm not worried about import PS1 and PS2 software or hardware sales stopping because of one store. Heck, even at the end of this press release, Lik Sang states that,
"Daily business is unaffected by this lawsuit. Customers in the UK and elsewhere don't have to worry about negative side effects or disruption of service. Shipping, Customer Support and Order Processing are fully operational and Lik-Sang.com remains open as usual."
Yes, I feel sorry for Lik-Sang, but Play-Asia has as good or better selection of import software for Sony consoles, and Lik-Sang has enough of a loyal customer base that I seriously doubt they'll go out of business. And the folks at Lik Sang should've been smart enough not to put up the text of the PSP manual on their own website.
And, IMO, there's simply no feasible way to make such a ban all-encompasing. Even if Lik-Sang, Play-Asia, and other import game stores in Hong Kong were prevented from selling import Sony Hardware and Software, there are SO many other businesses, and on-line forums, where the selling and trading of such products goes on, that there's no way Sony could stop all of it.
I do agree with 99Pence, though; there's absolutely nothing unethical about purchasing games from where one wants to purchase them from, unless they're bootlegs or some other such illegal crap.