Is this still the best choice since it was released like years ago?! I am considering one but I thought it is better to first ask since perhaps an improved one or a better alternative exists...
thnx,
XRGB 3
Re: XRGB 3
short answer: yes, still the best processor for 240p sources
long answer: it comes at a price. The unit is expensive, the 480i processing is mediocre at best and other processors paired with the SLG3000 come very close in picture quality. For some sources (e.g. a MVS) other processor are even better suited than the XRGB.
long answer: it comes at a price. The unit is expensive, the 480i processing is mediocre at best and other processors paired with the SLG3000 come very close in picture quality. For some sources (e.g. a MVS) other processor are even better suited than the XRGB.
Re: XRGB 3
I'd add it's hands-down the best for non-scanlined 1080p scaling of 240p sources. For 480p and component processing it's sort of only half a unit; the XSelect cleans up the noisy D/A conversion. Next time, please, put these questions in the XRGB-3 thread...
Re: XRGB 3
That was weird, I thought the XRGB3 thread had vanished but for 4 posts 
OSSC Forums - http://www.videogameperfection.com/forums
Please check the Wiki before posting about Morph, OSSC, XRGB Mini or XRGB3 - http://junkerhq.net/xrgb/index.php/Main_Page
Please check the Wiki before posting about Morph, OSSC, XRGB Mini or XRGB3 - http://junkerhq.net/xrgb/index.php/Main_Page