Cave shmups in PCSX2

This is the main shmups forum. Chat about shmups in here - keep it on-topic please!
User avatar
Jockel
Posts: 3073
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

Post by Jockel »

Aw.
User avatar
LtC
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:03 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by LtC »

I think if you use some of the speedhacks it will cause extra slowdown that doesn't exist in the PS2 versions, that's why it's best not to touch those in DOJ's case. In Mushi's case though I don't know which ones actually cause it (Might be the cycle rate ones) but some of them might be helpful and make the game faster.
agustusx
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:08 pm

Post by agustusx »

Here are some visual comparisons between different settings for Mushi.

Mushi Visual Example
User avatar
Fudoh
Posts: 13040
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:29 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Fudoh »

The fourth picture looks amazing. Is this using an unpatched version of Mushi or one with the low-res patch applied ?
agustusx
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:08 pm

Post by agustusx »

Fudoh wrote:The fourth picture looks amazing. Is this using an unpatched version of Mushi or one with the low-res patch applied ?
Good call, this is the patched version, I can run a test on the unpatched too.
User avatar
Fudoh
Posts: 13040
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:29 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Fudoh »

It would be much more interesting to see a real 480i-only game running on it with different output modes selected. Something like Shiki 2 or Gradius 5 maybe.
agustusx
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:08 pm

Post by agustusx »

I will let you guess which is patched and unpatched :wink:
Image

Looking at this you are probably right Fudoh, but I will have to leave that test to someone else. I have neither.

patched is on right, not that there is a difference.
User avatar
null1024
Posts: 3823
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 8:52 pm
Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
Contact:

Post by null1024 »

Dave_K. wrote:
henry dark wrote:Saying 80$ for a PS2 is fine, but factor in the cost of getting Mushi, DOJ etc., plus the pain of finding them in the first place, and its not hard to see why this free option is attractive
Wouldn't you have to find/buy mushi, doj, etc anyway to play it on the pc emulator? If someone finds the roms for free, surley they can play the same roms on the PS2 via HDLoader for free...so your point is, well pointless.
It's called BitTorrent. Also, it's a bit easier to use an emulator than to get games running on real hardware when you d/l them.
Come check out my website, I guess. Random stuff I've worked on over the last two decades.
captpain
Posts: 1783
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:23 am

Post by captpain »

I run Mushi at 1024x768 internal res and screen res, and when I get in the game I press F5 six times to get the right interlacing.

Anyway, is there a key that displays the FPS? How do people know the FPS that they are running?
agustusx
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:08 pm

Post by agustusx »

captpain wrote:I run Mushi at 1024x768 internal res and screen res, and when I get in the game I press F5 six times to get the right interlacing.

Anyway, is there a key that displays the FPS? How do people know the FPS that they are running?
if you are using the GSDX plugin I do not think so. Fraps works and has benchmarking abilities.
User avatar
henry dark
Posts: 442
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:26 am
Location: VFD

Post by henry dark »

Dave_K. wrote:
henry dark wrote:Saying 80$ for a PS2 is fine, but factor in the cost of getting Mushi, DOJ etc., plus the pain of finding them in the first place, and its not hard to see why this free option is attractive
Wouldn't you have to find/buy mushi, doj, etc anyway to play it on the pc emulator? If someone finds the roms for free, surley they can play the same roms on the PS2 via HDLoader for free...so your point is, well pointless.
I think the HDLoader costs money.
User avatar
Jockel
Posts: 3073
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

Post by Jockel »

If you're able to get the game for free, you'll surely be able to get the program as well ;D
User avatar
mrtie
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:29 pm
Location: MI; The 989

Post by mrtie »

Ok i got to test out 9.6 today and I found some large improvements playing Ibara, no longer am i getting as much slow down, nor is the audio glitching. I'm using the newest gdsx plugin and with frame limit full 1080p resolution, and 2x speed hack. Both Mushi at least on normal mode and Ibara seem to have gotten a lot closer to DOJ in terms of speed with 9.6 for me, Galuda is still a giant mess though. These tests were run on E8400@ 3.6hz.
TodayIsForgotten
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:34 am
Location: New Jersey

Post by TodayIsForgotten »

Or you could go the softmod route on a ps2. Just throwing that out there. I think i'll be doing this. Oh, i see someone mentioned this a few posts up. HD ADVANCE is HDloader. You can get HDloader in the right places for free, since that is how its offered.
agustusx
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:08 pm

Post by agustusx »

mrtie wrote:Ok i got to test out 9.6 today and I found some large improvements playing Ibara, no longer am i getting as much slow down, nor is the audio glitching. I'm using the newest gdsx plugin and with frame limit full 1080p resolution, and 2x speed hack. Both Mushi at least on normal mode and Ibara seem to have gotten a lot closer to DOJ in terms of speed with 9.6 for me, Galuda is still a giant mess though. These tests were run on E8400@ 3.6hz.
They suggest not using speed hacks on "high end" machines and I think yours qualifies :) From my experience speed hacks cause unneeded "warp lag" in spots on Mushi. A major deal breaker. Basically it runs worse with hacks enabled.

I noticed that with Mushi I can set the res up very high for rendering and for the D3D internal resolution without impact(up to 2048x2048). However I noticed some slowdown when doing the same for Ibara.
User avatar
kengou
Posts: 1359
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 3:50 am
Location: East Coast, USA
Contact:

Post by kengou »

TodayIsForgotten wrote:Or you could go the softmod route on a ps2. Just throwing that out there. I think i'll be doing this. Oh, i see someone mentioned this a few posts up. HD ADVANCE is HDloader. You can get HDloader in the right places for free, since that is how its offered.
This is getting a bit off-topic. The discussion is about emulation of Cave games using PCSX2. I'm not talking about this because I can't play them on my PS2; I can and I do play them on my PS2. Some people just like to also play games in emulators because of the convenience factor. It's easier for me to plug in my USB pad and just fire up an emulator than it is to fire up the PS2 and boot up DOJ using Swap Magic. Especially right now, because I don't have my PS2 at school with me for the time being.

Besides, I think that the state of PS2 emulation as it pertains to shmups is an interesting one regardless of what the emulation is used for.
"I think Ikaruga is pretty tough. It is like a modern version of Galaga that some Japanese company made."
TodayIsForgotten
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:34 am
Location: New Jersey

Post by TodayIsForgotten »

Woa woa, i understand the original post. As I said a few posts back that i have a massive emulation collection... I'm pointing out that if people don't have the money to import such games or have a beefy enough computer or don't want the hassle of what game will run like a snail and what game will l run with a good frame rate...for 60 bucks you can pick up a boot loader for the ps2 and cheap hard drive. Then use HDloader to load the games from HDD and be done with it. No swap magic needed. For ease of use it would be the same thing in ways as PC emulation.

No worries.
captpain
Posts: 1783
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:23 am

Post by captpain »

Ibara looks pretty gross for me, even at increased resolution. The backgrounds are kind of fuzzy and vaguely distorted, and it doesn't looks quite sharp enough regardless of the interlacing setting.

DOJ looks great, but of course you can't increase the internal resolution. Mushi, as discussed, looks awesome with the resolution bumped up. Galuda looks good but isn't emulated properly.

Maybe Ibara is just an ugly port...
agustusx
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:08 pm

Post by agustusx »

captpain wrote:Ibara looks pretty gross for me, even at increased resolution. The backgrounds are kind of fuzzy and vaguely distorted, and it doesn't looks quite sharp enough regardless of the interlacing setting.

DOJ looks great, but of course you can't increase the internal resolution. Mushi, as discussed, looks awesome with the resolution bumped up. Galuda looks good but isn't emulated properly.

Maybe Ibara is just an ugly port...
I'm curious if you ever tried disabling the texture filtering for ibara?
captpain
Posts: 1783
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:23 am

Post by captpain »

agustusx wrote:
captpain wrote:Ibara looks pretty gross for me, even at increased resolution. The backgrounds are kind of fuzzy and vaguely distorted, and it doesn't looks quite sharp enough regardless of the interlacing setting.

DOJ looks great, but of course you can't increase the internal resolution. Mushi, as discussed, looks awesome with the resolution bumped up. Galuda looks good but isn't emulated properly.

Maybe Ibara is just an ugly port...
I'm curious if you ever tried disabling the texture filtering for ibara?
Yep, it's off.
User avatar
Cyarc
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:08 pm

Post by Cyarc »

Good topic! Thanks for the tips and graphic comparison.

Just last week I started to look into PS2 emulation. I was sick of having to tip my TV over on its side, plus it is only 13 inches. It is much easier to to tip my computer monitor on its side and its almost twice as big.
What are you trying to tell me, that I can dodge bullets?
User avatar
LtC
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:03 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Cave shmups in PCSX2

Post by LtC »

ESP.Galuda runs at 100% with the latest beta version and plugins (Pcsx2 beta 1474). Still some small glitching left but otherwise it seems to run faster than Mushi. I guess there's hope getting it running as well as DOJ does in then near future if we're lucky.

Some other games I tested seem to run a lot faster than with the 0.9.6 version, not 100% sure about the rest of the cave games though.
captpain
Posts: 1783
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:23 am

Re: Cave shmups in PCSX2

Post by captpain »

LtC wrote:ESP.Galuda runs at 100% with the latest beta version and plugins (Pcsx2 beta 1474). Still some small glitching left but otherwise it seems to run faster than Mushi. I guess there's hope getting it running as well as DOJ does in then near future if we're lucky.

Some other games I tested seem to run a lot faster than with the 0.9.6 version, not 100% sure about the rest of the cave games though.
Ahhh *finally*! Thanks for the update.

edit: Hmm, Galuda has a lot of hiccups, and actually crashed at the first stage boss. I'm going to do some tweaking, but I bet it's still essentially broken.
User avatar
General Martok
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:27 am

Re: Cave shmups in PCSX2

Post by General Martok »

Cure 2 duo 3Ghz - Mushi runs at fullspeed , 1280x960
Last time I tried this was half a year ago , though
captpain
Posts: 1783
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:23 am

Re: Cave shmups in PCSX2

Post by captpain »

General Martok wrote:Cure 2 duo 3Ghz - Mushi runs at fullspeed , 1280x960
Last time I tried this was half a year ago , though
Are you talking screen resolution or rendering resolution, or both?
User avatar
EPS21
Posts: 575
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:20 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Cave shmups in PCSX2

Post by EPS21 »

I guess mushi has more problems with other systems besides a C2D e8400 (or that line of CPU's) than I thought, I also have that processor (system atm is 3ghz e8400, 4gb ram, nvidia 9800gtx+), at stock speeds and at 3.8-4ghz, the game runs great, maybe cause of GSDX plugins that take advantage of the SSE 4.1 instruction set.

I really hope espgaluda works well with the newest beta release, will be trying it now.
captpain
Posts: 1783
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:23 am

Re: Cave shmups in PCSX2

Post by captpain »

DOJ now scales properly. It's running 100% for me at 1600x1200 internal res, and 1600x1200 screen res. It looks fucking fantastic.
User avatar
emphatic
Posts: 7988
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:47 pm
Location: Alingsås, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Cave shmups in PCSX2

Post by emphatic »

captpain wrote:DOJ now scales properly. It's running 100% for me at 1600x1200 internal res, and 1600x1200 screen res. It looks fucking fantastic.
Screen dump, please?
Image | My games - http://www.emphatic.se
RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
captpain
Posts: 1783
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:23 am

Re: Cave shmups in PCSX2

Post by captpain »

emphatic wrote:
captpain wrote:DOJ now scales properly. It's running 100% for me at 1600x1200 internal res, and 1600x1200 screen res. It looks fucking fantastic.
Screen dump, please?
Image
User avatar
emphatic
Posts: 7988
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:47 pm
Location: Alingsås, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Cave shmups in PCSX2

Post by emphatic »

Wow, that looks very nice. Even without scanlines.
Image | My games - http://www.emphatic.se
RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
Post Reply