Ok now i got a hold of the german seller of the Optoma. And i have learned that he would trade me the Optoma HD3000 for my XRGB3. What do you recommend i do here?
don't do it. From a money-standpoint alone it's not really worth it, since you can get a 1080p HD3000 for 328 EUR shipped which is the same you'd pay for a new XRGB-3.
As far as i can understand the Optoma only accepts 240p through the component input, so thats a bummer for MegaDrive and Saturn. But would this problem be fixed by using a simple RGB to Component converter?
No, it won't. It's a not a RGBs vs. component problem. It's a timing problem of the source signals. A PS1 game on a PS2 will work with either component or RGBs, but a Saturn will never work, no matter how it's connected.
Also the Optoma always has the 30ms lag and doesn't have a scanline feature. But on the other hand should be a lot better deinterlacer for PS2 than the iScan Pro
no, not really. The actual deinterlacer is good, but not neccessarily better than the iScan Pro. Somewhere in my german Optoma HD3000 Review I posted a video download link (
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=VWRV3QPG). This video shows an example where the deinterlacer in the Optoma has problems with a PS2 game.
I'm very tempted to trade him my XRGB3 for his Optoma. And then buy another XRGB3 later. What would Fudoh do?
If you don't have the extra money right now, you can do it, but I guarantee you: you'll re-buy a XRGB-3 for sure.
In all my HD3000 writings I recommend the Optoma as a **perfect upscaler** for progressive signals (480p and up). In terms of deinterlacing is it's far superior to the iScan Pro for MOVIES (SD and HD), but for our gaming needs, you're well equipped with your iScan Pro (for 480i sources).
The HD3000 is a very nice ADDITION to our setups. It shines between an XRGB-3 and a display and it does wonderful things to 240p and 480p PS1 and PS2 games, but with you using a lot other systems as well (MD, SAT) you definitely NEED your XRGB
