LCD in candy cab
LCD in candy cab
anyone ever install an LCD monitor in a candy cab?
Wondering if that would even be worth while.
Wondering if that would even be worth while.
-
- Posts: 9099
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:32 pm
Re: LCD in candy cab
A fellow shmupper has made custom cocktail table cabinets that use a $1,000+ USD low-res 19" LCD-based monitor setup. No LCD monitor manufacturer has made such 27" or 29" low-res LCD monitors (with the traditional 4:3 screen aspect ratio) as a direct replacement for the aging candy cabs that use the 29" Nanao CRT-base RGB monitors. If there is enough demand, then they could easily make them. I'd be up for one if they were available for purchase. ^_~Grime wrote:anyone ever install an LCD monitor in a candy cab?
Wondering if that would even be worth while.
PC Engine Fan X! ^_~
Re: LCD in candy cab
Wow, expensive. Probably a crap panel with prices kept high by low demandPC Engine Fan X! wrote:A fellow shmupper has made custom cocktail table cabinets that use a $1,000+ USD low-res 19" LCD-based monitor setup.

Link to that panel, or a name?
Re: LCD in candy cab
A little more than halfway down the page is the first post. Then on the next page this tidbitEd Oscuro wrote:Wow, expensive. Probably a crap panel with prices kept high by low demandPC Engine Fan X! wrote:A fellow shmupper has made custom cocktail table cabinets that use a $1,000+ USD low-res 19" LCD-based monitor setup.![]()
Link to that panel, or a name?
The sticker on the unit says "Hantarex Germany, 19-inch Multisync Wide-Angle". I think the panel itself was made by AOU. I do not know who provided the A/D multisync converter inside. One of these units will set you back approx. 1.000 USD (tax included), no kidding.
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 9:48 pm
You could also get a normal commercial LCD screen and run low res games through an upscan converter of some sort. You might get a little bit of lag depending on the converter but not likely to be anything serious for shooting games. This isn't a bad idea as it also lets you more easily hook up a PC, 360/PS3, or Type-X to the cab, if you had any interest in that.
If you're purely running old 15Khz boards though, no real reason to bother with an LCD.
If you're purely running old 15Khz boards though, no real reason to bother with an LCD.
Wow, that does look sweet.robivy64 wrote:A friend of mine just recently installed a 20" Samsung computer LCD monitor in his Jaleco Pony II and it looks fantastic. He bought a CGA/RGB to VGA converter and plays PCBs (not MAME) in it. He didn't spend a ton either.
An LCD really looks great in those older boxy cabinets.

RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
Lookie here: http://www.arcademvs.com/ARCADE_ACESSERIOR.htmjonny5 wrote:any idea where he got that converter?

RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
Very nice! But to be honest, upscaled without scanlines doesn't look all that great (pixel wise) in my opinion. He'd be better off using an XRGB2. I've tried playing PCBs via XRGB2 on my 36" LCDTV and it looks just as good as my 29" nano, but with perfect geometry.
I just don't have the balls to make a cab out of it.

Thats ... awesome. 
I actually have a couple extra 20" + computer lcd's getting no use.
Might have to try something like this out one day.

I actually have a couple extra 20" + computer lcd's getting no use.
Might have to try something like this out one day.
Last edited by Grime on Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
The key thing with converters is actually what they do with vertical sync rates. Most of the cheap ones (including the XRGB2+, if I remember right) don't change the vertical frequency. Most LCDs will do just fine within some +/- of 60hz, but you try to throw something like RF Jet or Viper Phase at it, it's probably not going to work.
Something like the VP30 will 'convert' the refresh rate, but that's not cheap.
Something like the VP30 will 'convert' the refresh rate, but that's not cheap.
Ah yeah, vertical sync would be a problem, would work out ok, if you had a consolized mvs system or something. but thats alot of money too.zakk wrote:The key thing with converters is actually what they do with vertical sync rates. Most of the cheap ones (including the XRGB2+, if I remember right) don't change the vertical frequency. Most LCDs will do just fine within some +/- of 60hz, but you try to throw something like RF Jet or Viper Phase at it, it's probably not going to work.
Something like the VP30 will 'convert' the refresh rate, but that's not cheap.
Cool, if the LCD can adjust for it then you're in good shape. Just have to make sure the display can do that. I was in the unfortunate position of using this stuff for vidcaps so shifted image was pretty much a disaster for me.robivy64 wrote:We specifically tested RF Jet in that cab and it works great. The picture shifts to one side a little (expected), but after a quick adjust the geometry is perfect.
I need to hunt around for LCDs that'll fit in my old Egret 1 (and maybe even my Exceleena), even non-scanlined LCD would be an improvement over the crappy D9200
of course they don't really make 4:3 LCDs that big, so...
-
- Posts: 9099
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:32 pm
So what's the biggest 4:3 aspect ratio sized LCD monitors that $$$ can buy these days?zakk wrote:Cool, if the LCD can adjust for it then you're in good shape. Just have to make sure the display can do that. I was in the unfortunate position of using this stuff for vidcaps so shifted image was pretty much a disaster for me.robivy64 wrote:We specifically tested RF Jet in that cab and it works great. The picture shifts to one side a little (expected), but after a quick adjust the geometry is perfect.
I need to hunt around for LCDs that'll fit in my old Egret 1 (and maybe even my Exceleena), even non-scanlined LCD would be an improvement over the crappy D9200
of course they don't really make 4:3 LCDs that big, so...
-
- Posts: 9099
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:32 pm
That'd be quite something if you could a make a custom-made cab with that 36" LCD TV in conjunction with an XRGB-2 with your arcade PCBs, Dave K. I like how the XRGB-2 provides the option of fake scanlines for completeness. ^_~Dave_K. wrote:Very nice! But to be honest, upscaled without scanlines doesn't look all that great (pixel wise) in my opinion. He'd be better off using an XRGB2. I've tried playing PCBs via XRGB2 on my 36" LCDTV and it looks just as good as my 29" nano, but with perfect geometry.I just don't have the balls to make a cab out of it.
21 inches. These are running at 1600x1200 resolution.So what's the biggest 4:3 aspect ratio sized LCD monitors that $$$ can buy these days?
Last summer we (me & a friend) exchanged a 27/29" CRT with a LCD. We used a 26" 16:10 model from LG and masked the unused area. We had to built a border anyway to fill up the CRT area, so I don't really see the problem with 4:3 screens. The unused area between 4:3 and 16:10 isn't this large and if you use a monitor with a thin chassis border the surrounding border/mask won't become this wide either. You're basically using a 16:10 1920x1200 screen and use the 4:3 1600x1200 area inside it.
I plan on turning my current 52" LCD into a vertical cab later this year when I buy a new 60" screen for movies. Will be rockin' hotThat'd be quite something if you could a make a custom-made cab with that 36" LCD TV in conjunction with an XRGB-2 with your arcade PCBs, Dave K. I like how the XRGB-2 provides the option of fake scanlines for completeness. ^_~

Show us pictures please!Fudoh wrote:21 inches. These are running at 1600x1200 resolution.So what's the biggest 4:3 aspect ratio sized LCD monitors that $$$ can buy these days?
Last summer we (me & a friend) exchanged a 27/29" CRT with a LCD. We used a 26" 16:10 model from LG and masked the unused area. We had to built a border anyway to fill up the CRT area, so I don't really see the problem with 4:3 screens. The unused area between 4:3 and 16:10 isn't this large and if you use a monitor with a thin chassis border the surrounding border/mask won't become this wide either. You're basically using a 16:10 1920x1200 screen and use the 4:3 1600x1200 area inside it.
I plan on turning my current 52" LCD into a vertical cab later this year when I buy a new 60" screen for movies. Will be rockin' hotThat'd be quite something if you could a make a custom-made cab with that 36" LCD TV in conjunction with an XRGB-2 with your arcade PCBs, Dave K. I like how the XRGB-2 provides the option of fake scanlines for completeness. ^_~

RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
I was considering doing something like that since it seems to be getting harder to find 4:3 lcds, good to know that it works well.Fudoh wrote: Last summer we (me & a friend) exchanged a 27/29" CRT with a LCD. We used a 26" 16:10 model from LG and masked the unused area. We had to built a border anyway to fill up the CRT area, so I don't really see the problem with 4:3 screens. The unused area between 4:3 and 16:10 isn't this large and if you use a monitor with a thin chassis border the surrounding border/mask won't become this wide either. You're basically using a 16:10 1920x1200 screen and use the 4:3 1600x1200 area inside it.
I was thinking having a bezel set up for 3:4, and another one for 16:10 so I can use it for hori stuff and a media center.