Why is the picture quality on HDTVs so bad?(I'm not kidding)

A place where you can chat about anything that isn't to do with games!
User avatar
Domino
Posts: 1346
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Florida

Post by Domino »

I would like to upgrade to a LCD but the problem is that I still use my Laserdiscs a lot (I like the format, DVDs are lame at times 8)). If I run the LD thru composite I know it will look like horseshit on LCDs.

I was thinking about buying a LCD monitior with HDMI inputs so I can run my DVD player via HDMI (for upscaling) and I have a XRGB2 for anything SD. Then again I herd that the XRGB2 are flicky with LCDs.
User avatar
worstplayer
Posts: 861
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: Slovakia

Post by worstplayer »

moozooh wrote: Worst math ever, seriously.

Bitrate/resolution ratio has never been linear, and the codecs used are different. That's why a DVD ISO and an HD rip floating over at torrent trackers weigh similarly.

Hell, you wouldn't even get the same picture with the same codec at different settings. Go to super-play.co.uk and see how many runs weigh over 300MB, yet look like they've been freshly crapped out. (For comparison, this is a good example of the opposite.)

Please don't use this argument in the future, it's misleading at the very best. :\
Yeah, I didn't know they can use different codecs.
But come on, those "HD" rips with same size as normal DVD rips? Did you try watching one? Even those "crapped out" videos from super-play put them to shame (As far as compression goes of course).
"A game isn't bad because you resent it. A game is bad because it's shitty."
moozooh
Posts: 3722
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: moscow/russia
Contact:

Post by moozooh »

Most of the 4-6GB HDrips that I've had (admittedly it's not too many, about a dozen perhaps) look flawless. I guess it might be due to preferring H.264 rips over XviD, since XviD is way less effective, especially at high resolutions. Also might be the problem of the guy who did the encoding, not all of them know how both to combine a good quality/size ratio together with good picture quality. It's actually pretty hard (always gets lots of time wasted in the process).
Image
Matskat wrote:This neighborhood USED to be nice...until that family of emulators moved in across the street....
User avatar
jpj
Posts: 3670
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:44 pm

Post by jpj »

i miss you tagging your posts PCEFX :(
RegalSin wrote:Videogames took my life away like the Natives during colonial times.
PC Engine Fan X!
Posts: 9123
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:32 pm

Post by PC Engine Fan X! »

Domino wrote:I would like to upgrade to a LCD but the problem is that I still use my Laserdiscs a lot (I like the format, DVDs are lame at times 8)). If I run the LD thru composite I know it will look like horseshit on LCDs.

I was thinking about buying a LCD monitior with HDMI inputs so I can run my DVD player via HDMI (for upscaling) and I have a XRGB2 for anything SD. Then again I herd that the XRGB2 are flicky with LCDs.
For Domino,

If your SD monitor has S-Video input, you might want to take advantage of the crisper visuals afforded that video connection route (assuming if your LD player can output in S-Video). ^_~

Alright just for you, jpj, I'll tag my posts -- it's all done by hand anyways. ^_~

PC Engine Fan X! ^_~
User avatar
antron
Posts: 2861
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 7:53 pm
Location: Egret 29, USA

Post by antron »

TV stores often split one signal into dozens, and hence look like shit.


As for HDTV,
If you are a sports fan, the difference is obvious. There is no going back to SD. SD is shit. you cant see the puck. you can't see the cheerleaders pubic hair sticking out. and you can't buy it on DVD no matter how good your SD tv is.
User avatar
Davey
Posts: 1605
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Toledo, OH

Post by Davey »

I recently bought an HDTV. My TV usage is like this:

5% TV (all local network stations)
25% DVDs
70% Xbox 360

My previous set was a no-name brand CRT I bought on sale back in college, maybe 5 years ago. Here's what I've noticed:

TV: Anything broadcast in HD looks really great. I'm just using a regular, cheap-o indoor antenna. SD content looks like total shit, but pretty much everything I watch is prime time on Fox (720p) or NBC (1080i), so no big deal.
DVDs: They look decent, but not great. I know my receiver can upscale it to 720p or 1080i, but I haven't messed around with it yet because I can't find my remote. :x
Xbox 360: Looked ok at first, but I was using composite cables. Once my HDMI cables came in the mail, games looked incredible.

Basically:
HD on HDTV = way better than CRT
SD on HDTV = puke
User avatar
Domino
Posts: 1346
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Florida

Post by Domino »

PC Engine Fan X! wrote:
Domino wrote:I would like to upgrade to a LCD but the problem is that I still use my Laserdiscs a lot (I like the format, DVDs are lame at times 8)). If I run the LD thru composite I know it will look like horseshit on LCDs.

I was thinking about buying a LCD monitior with HDMI inputs so I can run my DVD player via HDMI (for upscaling) and I have a XRGB2 for anything SD. Then again I herd that the XRGB2 are flicky with LCDs.
For Domino,

If your SD monitor has S-Video input, you might want to take advantage of the crisper visuals afforded that video connection route (assuming if your LD player can output in S-Video). ^_~

Alright just for you, jpj, I'll tag my posts -- it's all done by hand anyways. ^_~

PC Engine Fan X! ^_~
My LD player can output in S-Video put the problem is that since LD is a composite format it would look better running it in composite.
User avatar
jonny5
Posts: 5081
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: toronto

Post by jonny5 »

Domino wrote:

My LD player can output in S-Video put the problem is that since LD is a composite format it would look better running it in composite.
what? :? .....ummmmmm......huh?
trivial
Posts: 417
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:27 am

Post by trivial »

LD is analog composite video. The only possible advantage of s-video is obviated if your TV has a decent comb filter.
User avatar
Ed Oscuro
Posts: 18654
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: uoıʇɐɹnƃıɟuoɔ ɯǝʇsʎs

Post by Ed Oscuro »

jonny5 wrote:
Domino wrote:

My LD player can output in S-Video put the problem is that since LD is a composite format it would look better running it in composite.
what? :? .....ummmmmm......huh?
Different varieties of composite, good ol' terminology confusion :p

Also, DVD uses hilariously outdated codecs, and I'm not sure what worstplayer's math was supposed to be proving. It was like

Maths!
Random conclusion is reached!
User avatar
Domino
Posts: 1346
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Florida

Post by Domino »

trivial wrote:LD is analog composite video. The only possible advantage of s-video is obviated if your TV has a decent comb filter.
From what I heard only use S-Video if you are using a TV made in the early 90s that supports S-Video. If running this on a HDTV it's best to use composite since the comb filter is much better (running it via S-Video will cause the player to run its own outdated comb filter).

I run my LDs via the XRGB2 and running it in composite or in S-Video will look the same.
User avatar
D
Posts: 3801
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Almere, Netherlands
Contact:

Post by D »

It's because people are morrons and do not set their tv's to optimal settings. And I am talking about non-hardcore consumers and sales people. These guys are dense and do not care about pq and also use whatever cable came with the thing they bought. If they have a displayed image they are happy. you tell them that different cables give better pq, but people do not care about this at all. They stretch the hekk out of 4:3 broadcasts which angers me so much. But that is just the downfall of mankind! :lol:
Go look on avforums, find the best (plasma) tv in your buying range, buy, go home, fiddle with it (the tv) and prepare to be amazed. Well if you use decent cable types that is. component, rgb SCART, hdmi/vga/dvi. Offcourse crt is better, but where can you buy a HD (ready) 50" crt?
User avatar
Kaiser
Posts: 1729
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:20 am

Post by Kaiser »

Well question, i'm buying a HDTV soon, a Toshiba Regza will be good enough for PS3 and that next-gen stuff? I have a chance to buy 37" inch one in next 2-3 months because i saved up cash for it with brother and we're moving out to a larger apartment. 37XV550 model to be exact
Zenodyne R - My 2nd Steam Shmup
User avatar
Udderdude
Posts: 6294
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:55 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by Udderdude »

I know exactly what the OP is talking about, I've been to Futureshop, etc. and seen 50' HDTVs on display running SDTV (NTSC 640x480) content. It looked god-awful.

You think they would just get some blu-ray players and hook those up to all of them. Some of them were running that, and it looked amazing.
User avatar
Turrican
Posts: 4727
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:28 am
Location: Landorin
Contact:

Re: Why is the picture quality on HDTVs so bad?(I'm not kidd

Post by Turrican »

Ed Oscuro wrote:Thanks for dusting off the old crystal ball for us, O Magnificent Carnac. Smellovision's going to be a failure, huh?
Ed Oscuro wrote:I tend to agree that it's a good idea to hold onto an old-fashioned tube, the best that can be found. Won't last forever but hopefully it'll last long enough. Probably the future holds expensive upscalers for most of us, I'm afraid.
There's no need to be magicians, after all. It's a predictable reaction coming from any gamer who's in love with the videogames of his youth.
Image
X - P - B
User avatar
Ceph
Posts: 3693
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Europe

Post by Ceph »

I would imagine that for instance for laser TVs there will eventually be upscalers that "upscale" sdtv like that:

image line
blank (black) line
image line
blank (black) line
image line
etc.

Using this, the picture quality of SD sources should be similar to what it is on a real sdtv.
Image
moozooh
Posts: 3722
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: moscow/russia
Contact:

Post by moozooh »

2x scaling + 1/2 scanline insertion? That's possible on every display. Analogue displays do a similar thing natively, which is what allows them to display lower resolutions in fullscreen. The only question is, whether there will be the option to do that.
Image
Matskat wrote:This neighborhood USED to be nice...until that family of emulators moved in across the street....
User avatar
jpj
Posts: 3670
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:44 pm

Post by jpj »

RegalSin wrote:Videogames took my life away like the Natives during colonial times.
User avatar
system11
Posts: 6290
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:17 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Why is the picture quality on HDTVs so bad?(I'm not kidd

Post by system11 »

brokenhalo wrote: watching tv at your friends house, i'm assuming you were watching a digital cable tv feed? if so, block noise from that source is a problem even with sdtv's. the cable companies are trying to push huge amounts of digital tv feeds down outdated lines, causing blockiness, frame drops, even blank screens.
We've got digital cable, this is exactly what's going on. The most telling thing is the 'main' channels have a MUCH better quality feed than smaller channels - some of which are borderline unwatchable. The PPV movie feeds are also better quality than the normal (subscription) movie channels.

None of them even come close to a good Blu-Ray player, with a good BR disc, on a good HDTV. Some of the stuff I have at home is stunning to watch, although you have to be wary of quick "HD" conversions of older material. Some of it looks better than it ever has, some is nothing but a dirty copy of the DVD, rescaled with a little noise reduction.
System11's random blog, with things - and stuff!
http://blog.system11.org
User avatar
D
Posts: 3801
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Almere, Netherlands
Contact:

Post by D »

Anyway, this entire thread is false.
Its not guns that kill people, it's people that kill people
Its not bad hdtv's, it's people that set hdtv's badly!
And for reference and/or starting point I'm a fan of Panasonic plasma's. So start with that and I dare you to find something better than that. They're cheap also! Good luck!
fd_analog
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:06 pm
Location: Londres / Tokyo

Post by fd_analog »

Turrican wrote:Simple answer: nothing will ever beat a CRT, SD-def TV. End of story.
Exactly. I spent 8 years in R&D for a well respected Japanese electronics manufacturer. It's completely true.
fd_analog
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:06 pm
Location: Londres / Tokyo

Post by fd_analog »

Davey wrote:HD on HDTV = way better than CRT
That is technically impossible.
moozooh
Posts: 3722
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: moscow/russia
Contact:

Post by moozooh »

Also, nothing will ever beat VHS. That's a proven fact, because I spent 23 years in R&D for a major electronics manufacturer. Also, true.
Image
Matskat wrote:This neighborhood USED to be nice...until that family of emulators moved in across the street....
User avatar
Ceph
Posts: 3693
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Europe

Post by Ceph »

Hahaha.

Image

"I believe in horses. The automobile is a transient phenomenon"- Wilhelm II, German Emperor, 1905



I seriously doubt that CRT is better than Laser TV (colors, contrast, sharpness, brightness).
Image
User avatar
D
Posts: 3801
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Almere, Netherlands
Contact:

Post by D »

I'm sure that a Pioneer Kura will almost if not beat a crt.
THE FUTURE IS NOW!
My panasonic plasma does not beat a crt, but it is close enough to not be anal about it, and I'm known for being anal about pq, aren't I? :wink:

Oh yeah and before I forget. Color tv sucks. I've got one of the best b&w tv's ever made. The Sony Bull-S-808. This screen has better contrast than any color tv can ever have. I watch blu rays on b&w now. color is so overrated. Stereo too. I listen to mono only. cheaper too, I only have to buy 1 speaker :D And the + side is that I never have to fiddle with the balance knob ever again.
User avatar
brokenhalo
Posts: 1406
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 4:11 am
Location: philly suburbs

Post by brokenhalo »

moozooh wrote:Also, nothing will ever beat VHS. That's a proven fact, because I spent 23 years in R&D for a major electronics manufacturer. Also, true.
fucking win.
User avatar
Ceph
Posts: 3693
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Europe

Post by Ceph »

D wrote:Pioneer Kura
You mean "kuro" (which is Japanese for black). Again, I'm certain that Laser TV is better than any plasma.
Image
User avatar
D
Posts: 3801
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Almere, Netherlands
Contact:

Post by D »

Ceph wrote:
D wrote:Pioneer Kura
You mean "kuro" (which is Japanese for black). Again, I'm certain that Laser TV is better.
yeah kuro, It probably is better, but laser tv is probably more expensive. Anyway, it's all about the people operating it. Do not expect the average person to optimize settings, they don't care!
When I bought my Sony 720p 50" lcd tv, the shop set the image quality to look like shit. I came home and turned sharpness from 100 to 0 and my smile was like this :D
User avatar
emphatic
Posts: 7984
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:47 pm
Location: Alingsås, Sweden
Contact:

Post by emphatic »

I did own a (rather cheap) 32" CRT, but as it did not have RGB or component inputs (only antenna/s-video/composit) I bought myself a Panasonic Plasma. Been happy with it from day 1. This probably has to do with:

* If I want to play games, I go to the other room and play on my cabinets 29" screens (4:3 = win)
* The only thing aired we ever watch on the plasma is the childrens shows (analogue cable TV, would look horrible on LCD)
* All movies/TV-Shows are watched in 720p from HDMI

Before I *upgraded* (as this thread clearly says that HD is bad) I connected my HTPC to the CRT using S-Video. Lots of interlacing/flickering going on, and 1024x768 stretched by the TV to 16:9, weak colors. The Plasma's colors/sharpness/contrast is extraordinary.

If you buy a plasma/LCD and only watch movies/tv-shows in hi-def, *you* won't miss the CRT unless you keep one next to your plasma at all times.
Image | My games - http://www.emphatic.se
RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
Post Reply