Bach was insane!!??
Bach was insane!!??
Great, another topic just for me...
So, I've been heavily collecting classical lately (I am a music-binge-shopper), and realized just with a handful of bach box sets, I had some 45 discs of bach (yow!!!)
So, I knew that the complete works of bach on CD (which runs over $1000), is between 150 and 180 CDs (there are two 'complete' sets), and I was curious where I was at as far as having the Bach I wanted...since I only love part of what the man did.
Now this is just a loose estimate, but assuming that most of the CDs of Bach are mostly full, I've come to this rather terrifying realization:
150 total discs of musc MINUS the 45 discs I own MINUS the 60 discs of Cantatas I don't want MINUS 5 discs worth I have yet to purchase = 40 discs worth of Bach that I have no clue what it even is. And THAT is taking the smallest estimate on the total amount of Bach.
I feel like I know Bach fairly well, this is certainly including all the organ works (actually there might be a few discs unaccounted for here), masses, various concertos, sonatas, partitas, keyboard exercises and the WTC, brandenberg concertos, goldberg variations, blah blah blah.
40 fucking discs I've never even heard of.
I imagine other composers coming to Bach and the man screaming out at them 'I take shits bigger than you!'
Oh, and the guy had time to have kids too (apparently while composing music). What the hell?
So, I've been heavily collecting classical lately (I am a music-binge-shopper), and realized just with a handful of bach box sets, I had some 45 discs of bach (yow!!!)
So, I knew that the complete works of bach on CD (which runs over $1000), is between 150 and 180 CDs (there are two 'complete' sets), and I was curious where I was at as far as having the Bach I wanted...since I only love part of what the man did.
Now this is just a loose estimate, but assuming that most of the CDs of Bach are mostly full, I've come to this rather terrifying realization:
150 total discs of musc MINUS the 45 discs I own MINUS the 60 discs of Cantatas I don't want MINUS 5 discs worth I have yet to purchase = 40 discs worth of Bach that I have no clue what it even is. And THAT is taking the smallest estimate on the total amount of Bach.
I feel like I know Bach fairly well, this is certainly including all the organ works (actually there might be a few discs unaccounted for here), masses, various concertos, sonatas, partitas, keyboard exercises and the WTC, brandenberg concertos, goldberg variations, blah blah blah.
40 fucking discs I've never even heard of.
I imagine other composers coming to Bach and the man screaming out at them 'I take shits bigger than you!'
Oh, and the guy had time to have kids too (apparently while composing music). What the hell?
SHMUP sale page.Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
Castlevania too...and plenty of other games I'm sure.Turrican wrote:A real workaholic, huh. All these efforts brought to Gyruss after all!
Edit: Actually, what is that opening classical music in the boot-up screen on Gradius 2 (also shows up in Gradius Galaxies?)
SHMUP sale page.Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
Yes, its generic, they don't outright do bach, but some parts are VERY bach, though probably just more of a general baroque thing (but you can tell, Bach is his own kind of baroque).Turrican wrote:Bach in Castlevania? Where? Are you talking generic inspiration, or what?
Dunno about Gradius II.
Ack! It is Gradius 1 not 2, and the music probably isn't note for note lifted from any classical piece, though it is close enough...
SHMUP sale page.Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
-
Stormwatch
- Posts: 2327
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: Brazil
- Contact:
-
BulletMagnet
- Posts: 14202
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am
- Location: Wherever.
- Contact:
The Music of ParodiusBulletMagnet wrote:I wouldn't doubt that Bach showed up in one of the Parodius games someplace, a whole bunch of classical music got cute-em-upped in there.
There's some Bach there alright, but personally I just love playing the Moai Battleship level in Gokujyou Parodius with Wagner's Ride of the Valkyries as the BGM.
No matter how good a game is, somebody will always hate it. No matter how bad a game is, somebody will always love it.
My videos
My videos
Yep, any series which mixes classical tunes along with K.C. and the Sunshine Band is alright in my book.Ghegs wrote:The Music of ParodiusBulletMagnet wrote:I wouldn't doubt that Bach showed up in one of the Parodius games someplace, a whole bunch of classical music got cute-em-upped in there.
There's some Bach there alright, but personally I just love playing the Moai Battleship level in Gokujyou Parodius with Wagner's Ride of the Valkyries as the BGM.
-
MovingTarget
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 7:44 pm
- Location: Scotland
Nope, you can actually purchase the complete works of bach. They take up over 150 CDs. You are absolutely right though that many artists are more prolific than we give them credit for and there probably are many composers who have not seen all their music recorded, but Bach isn't one of them.
On the other hand, many composers have lost works--I don't know how frequently they know whether a work is lost or not (it is easy when you have say op. 1-4 then op. 6-9 that something happened to op.5, but as you might guess, it isn't always that convienant). Bach on the other hand has a lot of stuff attributed to him that may or may not have been composed by him. If anything, the works appearing under his name may be 'over recorded'.
On the other hand, many composers have lost works--I don't know how frequently they know whether a work is lost or not (it is easy when you have say op. 1-4 then op. 6-9 that something happened to op.5, but as you might guess, it isn't always that convienant). Bach on the other hand has a lot of stuff attributed to him that may or may not have been composed by him. If anything, the works appearing under his name may be 'over recorded'.
SHMUP sale page.Randorama wrote:ban CMoon for being a closet Jerry Falwell cockmonster/Ann Coulter fan, Nijska a bronie (ack! The horror!), and Ed Oscuro being unable to post 100-word arguments without writing 3-pages posts.
Eugenics: you know it's right!
What you have to remember is that composing (and actually many sorts of artistic activity) has become more and more about criticising underlying principles of production and developing new ones than about creating the work itself. For example in Bach's time it was possible to learn composition by picking up a book like Fux's "Rules of Counterpoint" and just practicing in a sort of mechanical fashion; when you composed you just sort of juggled the rules in your head and tried to find creative ways of applying the rules, rather than having to spend years developing an entirely new rule set.
This is why, for example, it was possible for Bach and Mozart to compose while walking in the countryside (and also why Mozart was able to compose artistically legitimate work at a young age); it also explains how those people could be prolific - the work sounds amazing as an expression of raw computing power, of course, but the amount of -development- is not all that different from somebody like Debussy, for example. The main difference is that Debussy had to spend a decade or two suffering and composing work that nobody would listen to (perform), since only work that sounded sufficiently new would be deemed sufficiently artistic to warrant performance/listening to.
As an aside, you might do better trying to compare different recordings of Bach rather than trying to encompass the entire output. I find that the most common mistake with people approaching classical music, they attempt to accumulate it instead of understanding it, for which listening to the whole corpus is unnecessary and perhaps even distracting. After all some of the music was written for somebody's birthday party and never intended to see the light of day again.
This is why, for example, it was possible for Bach and Mozart to compose while walking in the countryside (and also why Mozart was able to compose artistically legitimate work at a young age); it also explains how those people could be prolific - the work sounds amazing as an expression of raw computing power, of course, but the amount of -development- is not all that different from somebody like Debussy, for example. The main difference is that Debussy had to spend a decade or two suffering and composing work that nobody would listen to (perform), since only work that sounded sufficiently new would be deemed sufficiently artistic to warrant performance/listening to.
As an aside, you might do better trying to compare different recordings of Bach rather than trying to encompass the entire output. I find that the most common mistake with people approaching classical music, they attempt to accumulate it instead of understanding it, for which listening to the whole corpus is unnecessary and perhaps even distracting. After all some of the music was written for somebody's birthday party and never intended to see the light of day again.