A serious note about Last Hope

This is the main shmups forum. Chat about shmups in here - keep it on-topic please!
RHE
Posts: 547
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:16 pm

A serious note about Last Hope

Post by RHE »

Finally people here got me crying out loud. :lol:

To the beginning, this thread is for all the poeple cursing at Last Hope and still feel the need to talking aout this game in a rude way as shown in the DUX thread. To keep that one clean I'm starting this thread since I'm not going to discuss Last Hope with people who didn't read this posting, not even having played the game. This thread is no offense, it's just stating facts and showing my personal view also since there seems to be an demand.

So, Last Hope polarisates into two sections. The one who enjoying it and the one who don't.

Those people who dislike Last Hope are completly ignoring the people who enoying it. And that's one of the biggest problems here regarding Last Hope. It makes them believe that Last Hope must be a bad game per se but that's not the case. Some people just need to accept that different games have different ways to be fun so there must be some kind of varitiy to make every player pleasent. Manic shooting alone is not enough. Not even just simple R-Type clones.

I recommend to the people who dislike Last hope to commmunicate with people who liking it. It's the only way to get rid of your frustration and to understand why Last Hope is not a bad game per se. It's also favourable to start a thread in the strategy section of this board or just take a look at the stratey guide to understand how the game works and becomes reasonable.

There are also people who calling me arrogant for no reason since LH has been released on DC. I'm just refuse to take criticism from poeple who didn't spent more time then 10min with the game or just didn't play it a all but still trying judging about it. It's the easy way to blame a game or even the dev four your own bad. This is not the way a player should threat any games. This is not the way an adult person should threat anythings. And this attitude is also one on the reason why Shmups are not mainstream. People who playing mainstream games will harldy give shmups a try. When they do this, in most cases, they will enjoying it. To give LH a try is not so easy as the game is pretty hard but with some time it becomes reasonable. This has soemthing to do with LHs inaccessible nature. People who play shmup and participating discussion boards have to be more open about different approaches instead of fighting each other if Cave or Tohou is the better style. Both stsles a good in their own way. Discuss about the differents of those games instead, so both sides can arguing to understand the benifits of the different styles. People should talk on discussion boards and writing reviews of games for telling players why and how a game is enjoybale and not for stating is as good or bad.

Many people thinking Last Hope is impossible to clear, which is not the case as Plasmo proves. It just show who poeple didn't put much time into the game to understand the enemy order and the way to encounter them. Last Hope ist not a blasting action game, so you will need to play the game the way it is meant to be played - tactitcly. Even if you we, the devs, were confused and didn't know what tactical means when making the game and were going in a complete wrong direction with the game as we intenten, you still need to play the game as is meant to be played. Plasmo shows this on the LH DVD better then I ever could. Plasmo is one a of those poeple who complety can make use of Last Hopes gameplay by not just doing the tactics intedend to be in the game. Furthermore Plasmo is able to develop tactics on its own to for being able to clear the game on 1 life. This what Last Hope is about. Tactical approaching, step by step. When you don't like this pacing, you just can quit playing it. No problem with that. You can even say that you dislike the game. I'm fine with that. You can even go on discussion/gaming board and expressing your hate about the game. But there's one thing yuo can't do: Stating the game as a complete faliure/bad per se. Too many people enjoying this game to make this possible. You can go around the internet in evey retro gaming site with a Last hope thread. Which are not only a few sites. Then you will hardly find only one LH thread wihthout several people stating they enjoying Last Hope. My assumention is that from the about 2000 copies of LH DC floating around, 10000 people enjoying the game. That's a fairly good rate for such an inacassible and difficult game which never only one person ask for to be made. Nobody needs LH as much people of this time needing manic shooting. But LH is an alternative so that doesn't matter.

However, to play the game as it meant to be played you will need to accept its rules. Some poeple just can't do this with Last Hope. They just don't accept the games rules even if they understand them. Last Hope may looks kinda like R-Type but it plays completly different. To make a bit clearer what I mean with tactical approaching I will give a few examples.

The main core gameplay element is the ship with beam and 360° pod. You will need to handle that to progress ay further in this game. Unfortnualy many players experience Last Hope like that: You have a tiny ship with tiny shot and you're to slow to encounter all the enemy masses. That's not what Last Hope is about. With Last Hope you have the most powefulliest weps from beginning. Your beam, your movements and your mind. Use them wisely. To give a concrete games sitiuation let's take the first checkpoint of LH. It's the part when flying into the base. On the ground you will find some kind of little soldier shooting at you and some cannons. You can just fly down there with a fully loaded up beam and eliminate them. But then you will be out of defense, because on the roof there are cannons too. Normally you would get immideatly destroyed by those cannons but not in Last Hope. Just rotate the pod into the directions where those cannons are installed. So you have a defense and can also defeat those enemies. But now you get killes by another enemy and you're pod is gone. No problem. Just fly down again and kill those cannons but then just fly back, beacause there's a wall in middle of the room. Takes this wall as a defense to compensate the lack of the pod and then fly up and kill those cannons. Furhtermore, just a few steps ahaead from that there will be some enemy flying from behind into the screen. Normally those enmies are unfair and not pleasent to see. But in LH you just can put the pod into the back of the ship and shooting them. When losing your pod again, you just can point those enemies into a certain direction to makes them crushing into walls. This is what makes Last Hope tacticly. In Last Hope when you need a pod to survive you will get a pod. If theres not pod you can use walls as defense. Perfectly fair. The game is full of those defenses and sweet spots you just have to see them. To see them you must feel the need to see them but most of them are pretty obvious anyway. So you may just need to know the existence of those sweet spot to find them. So Last Hope is very different gameplay style then most other shooter, it's just have different rules. That's almost innovative. To the same time it's not what most people want to play. And then again, it's what some people want to play and that's enough to justify this game and it's way to be played. So it's just about taste.

Last Hope is something you will harldy experience in any other shooter. You just have to give it a try and get rid of your this it's just a R-Type clone thinking.

Update, title is now in a neutral tone.
Last edited by RHE on Tue May 13, 2008 5:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Turrican
Posts: 4727
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:28 am
Location: Landorin
Contact:

Post by Turrican »

I don't know if I must commend you for your passion defending your own game, or if I should notice that perhaps it's someone else's job to say if it's good or not.

P.S. I still haven't played it, so I'm out of the debate :)

Edit: I might add... a lot of the criticism I've read on the Dux thread (bad name, by the way) is wrong, because people are just criticizing the sub-genre LH belongs to. On the other hand, I red some serious criticism in the LH thread (bloodflowers comes to mind): like too vivid backgrounds, annoying bulletlike debris, less than visibile bullets, non-configurable pad.

I'd appreciate you defense of LH a lot more if you hadn't wrote something like "we programmers know why pads configuration must be fixed".
Image
X - P - B
User avatar
P_HAT
Posts: 1954
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Ukraine; Yalta
Contact:

Post by P_HAT »

LH is crappy clone of R-Type/Pulsar.

I give it 0 from 10.
Cuz we already have free games that MUCH better than LH.


the only one good thing about LH is music.

Dixi.
User avatar
Shatterhand
Posts: 4089
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:01 am
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Contact:

Post by Shatterhand »

From your description, I think I would enjoy this game.

Shame I have no Dreamcast.
Image
User avatar
P_HAT
Posts: 1954
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Ukraine; Yalta
Contact:

Post by P_HAT »

Turrican wrote: On the other hand, I red some serious criticism in the LH thread (bloodflowers comes to mind): like too vivid backgrounds, annoying bulletlike debris, less than visibile bullets, non-configurable pad.

I'd appreciate you defense of LH a lot more if you hadn't wrote something like "we programmers know why pads configuration must be fixed".
Also, they used us like beta testers.

N-G => DC => N-G CD
+bug fixes
+ more bug fixes.
User avatar
P_HAT
Posts: 1954
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Ukraine; Yalta
Contact:

Post by P_HAT »

Shatterhand wrote:From your description, I think I would enjoy this game.

Shame I have no Dreamcast.
i don't think so. LH just feels like shitty fan made game.
Also try emulator. I think it work on it. Or not XD


I can't understand why Plasmo like it.
:? :? :?
User avatar
Turrican
Posts: 4727
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:28 am
Location: Landorin
Contact:

Post by Turrican »

P_HAT wrote:Also, they used us like beta testers.

N-G => DC => N-G CD
+bug fixes
+ more bug fixes.
That's not a bad thing. Using comments from a community to improve a game.

I only feel sorry for the poor people who spent an INSANE amount of money on the first and arguably worst version. :?
Image
X - P - B
User avatar
P_HAT
Posts: 1954
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Ukraine; Yalta
Contact:

Post by P_HAT »

Turrican wrote:
P_HAT wrote:Also, they used us like beta testers.

N-G => DC => N-G CD
+bug fixes
+ more bug fixes.
That's not a bad thing. Using comments from a community to improve a game.

I only feel sorry for the poor people who spent an INSANE amount of money on the first and arguably worst version. :?
if i was on RHE place i will release N-G CD ver for DC for free.
Just to cover my shame.
User avatar
Plasmo
Posts: 3532
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:02 pm
Location: In a storm
Contact:

Post by Plasmo »

Last Hope really is a good game. Of course it's not perfect and there are many DC shmups which are definitely better, but I don't think you should compare them.
I still think Last Hope's stage 3 is one of the best horizontal shmup stages I've ever played: music, background, enemies, length, structure, etc....it's simply amazing.
If you hate stuff like R-Type, it's hard to appreciate LH, but just give it a try and eventually you can see that it's maybe not the best horizontal shooter but a very nice try, which is easily enjoyable and challenging at the same time.
Oh yeah and I should've probably opened this topic instead of RHE himself. Seems weird now if a programmer has to praise his own game this much cause everyone else hates it. :P
Last edited by Plasmo on Tue May 13, 2008 2:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I like chocolate milk

My highscores | Twitter | Twitch | YouTube
User avatar
Shatterhand
Posts: 4089
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:01 am
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Contact:

Post by Shatterhand »

P_HAT wrote:
Shatterhand wrote:From your description, I think I would enjoy this game.

Shame I have no Dreamcast.
i don't think so. LH just feels like shitty fan made game.
Also try emulator. I think it work on it. Or not XD
Nothing beats the real thing©
Image
User avatar
P_HAT
Posts: 1954
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Ukraine; Yalta
Contact:

Post by P_HAT »

User avatar
szycag
Posts: 2304
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:20 am
Location: Missouri

Post by szycag »

I don't completely ignore the people who enjoy it. But I'd be curious if they saw it as a fun game and not simply as a challenge. There are a lot of challenging things I can do in my life, what I need when I play video games (my escape from life) are fun things. I think you failed to make your game rewarding enough for the amount of challenge, and that is the main bullet point of my initial review. If you think otherwise then I think you should look into why people play video games in the first place. You talk of people being rude, but I think it is rude making excuses for all of these bugs instead of apologizing for them. "Don't like it? Tough!" is a charming thing for advertisements or the back of the box, not as real defenses in a forum like this.

Why do you admit to catering to a very very small group, not even of video gamers but solely shooting game fans, then feel the need to defend the game to shooter fans as a whole? You just seem to be scolding all shooting fans for not being this type of player, or not respecting the game on that level. You must realize how childish it is to make a thread saying your game is good. There are some people that agree, but maybe they are the kind of people that have the time on their hands to love challenge just for the sake of challenge. All the power to them!

That said, I will try to give Dux it's own fair chance aside from my feelings for this game, and I appreciate that the game is more affordable as an impulse buy this time. Hopefully you will be more humble about this one.
That is Galactic Dancing
User avatar
Super Laydock
Posts: 3094
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:24 pm
Location: Latis / Netherlands

Post by Super Laydock »

damn I never knew narcissus was into shmups. :shock: ;)

Best response to LH nay sayers= why don't you try harder.

:twisted:

Coming from a guy who can barely beat stage 2 btw...
Barroom hero!
Bathroom hero!
User avatar
szycag
Posts: 2304
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:20 am
Location: Missouri

Post by szycag »

Super Laydock wrote:why don't you try harder.
I have better things to do I guess.
That is Galactic Dancing
RHE
Posts: 547
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:16 pm

Post by RHE »

Shatterhand wrote:From your description, I think I would enjoy this game.
I hope so. And I think many more can enjoy it when they know what this game is about.
szycag wrote:You must realize how childish it is to make a thread saying your game is good.
You're completely missing the point of this thread. This threads purpose is not to say Last Hope is good and you are not good enuogh to play/enjoy it. The purpose of this thread is just a responce to the childish people coming uo into the DUX thread and bashing about Last Hope.

I'am not prasing my own game. It's just that some people need to realize that they can't state a game per see from their personal opinion. That's what the whole thread is about.

I'm just voicing the opinion many players thinking about Last Hope but they doesn't seem to articualte that in the form I'm doing it here and now for various reason.

The main reason why I'm starting this thread is anyhow, to make keep the DUX thread clean.
I have better things to do I guess.
Sounds strange to hear that fom your mouth since you did a review and even a poem about this game. You can't deny that Last Hope has some kind of fascination to you.
Don't you mean http://insomnia.ac/ ? :wink:

Also, I would do this for any underratred game I like but most of those are just not as much as misunderstood as Last hope.
User avatar
Lordstar
Posts: 3785
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: Liverpool,UK
Contact:

Post by Lordstar »

I had Last hope for a very short period of time. I picked up up and managed to get a mini with it and sold it as a set. Im sad to see it go but it was just way too unforgiving a game for me with little to no dificulty curve. It was rape, ass rape, Skull rape, "other" lol
Follow me on twitter for tees and my ramblings @karoshidrop
shmups members can purchase here http://shmups.system11.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=21158
User avatar
jpj
Posts: 3670
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:44 pm

Post by jpj »

i've played plenty of games that weren't to my taste, but i just sell them on, and probably never think about them again. why people bleat on forever about why they dislike a game seems odd to me. but then again...
szycag wrote: I have better things to do I guess.
that insomnia comment was pretty funny by the way :)
RegalSin wrote:Videogames took my life away like the Natives during colonial times.
User avatar
Plasmo
Posts: 3532
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:02 pm
Location: In a storm
Contact:

Post by Plasmo »

There are a lot of challenging things I can do in my life, what I need when I play video games (my escape from life) are fun things.
Are you sure you like shmups?
Go play some compile.
I like chocolate milk

My highscores | Twitter | Twitch | YouTube
User avatar
Turrican
Posts: 4727
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:28 am
Location: Landorin
Contact:

Post by Turrican »

Plasmo wrote:
There are a lot of challenging things I can do in my life, what I need when I play video games (my escape from life) are fun things.
Are you sure you like shmups?
Go play some compile.
Yay, gratuitous racism over one of the most influential shmup companies out there!
Image
X - P - B
User avatar
ubersaurus
Posts: 311
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:12 am
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Post by ubersaurus »

I really dug Last Hope. I played the crap out of that game when I got it...beat it too. I found it hard, but not unfair. It took a certain mindset and degree of problem solving to figure out the best routes through the different parts of the game, and reflexes and skill to actually make it. Plus, glitching the one boss with the shield to kill him fast was a great discovery XD

I don't get all the hate, but then lots of people on here hate on things I think are pretty awesome, and love stuff I dislike, so go figure.
Early video game historian - check out my book, Atari Archive Vol. 1, now on sale, and my Youtube channel Atari Archive for more!
kozo
Posts: 487
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:21 am

Post by kozo »

ubersaurus wrote:I don't get all the hate, but then lots of people on here hate on things I think are pretty awesome, and love stuff I dislike, so go figure.
:) Yay diversity! :)
User avatar
Ganelon
Posts: 4413
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 1:43 am

Post by Ganelon »

Yeah, I still don't get the hate either. Last Hope gets lambasted for its difficulty but from the hours I've spent (not enough to beat the game unfortunately), it didn't seem any harder than R-Type II. This game gets criticized for its visibility issues, but that doesn't stop people from respecting Battle Garegga. People say it plays like a euroshmup, but the feel is much more refined and polished from the Amiga shooters I've played (like comparing a modern doujin fighter to a euro fighter).

The topic title is misleading though so you may want to change it to something that'll express a more neutral tone. But yeah, I think Last Hope is a good game, one of the few shooters on the DC that I enjoy, and certainly more engaging than, say, R-Type Final.
User avatar
LSU
Posts: 363
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Post by LSU »

RHE, I have to say you are a very brave man starting this thread and defending your game in this way. I am also glad that you are continuing to make games and are striving to make the new one better than the last.

For the record, I do find Last Hope to be a decent game. But for me, someone with not too much time free between work and family commitments to play one game continuously for hours at a time, the slightly more forgiving Neo Geo CD version is by far the best suited. Even the Dreamcast version though, I do find better than a couple of the officially released games (for example - for me, it's more playable than Chaos Field, and probably just about on par with Trizeal overall).

But... Your best chance right now to prove yourself as a developer, is not by adamantly defending Last Hope, but to make DUX an absolutely killer game. If it receives critical and commercial success then you'll have proved you can make a great product, and also that you can learn from past experiences and take constructive criticism on board. Wouldn't that the best 'revenge' of all? ;)
RHE
Posts: 547
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:16 pm

Post by RHE »

Ganelon wrote:The topic title is misleading though so you may want to change it to something that'll express a more neutral tone.
I will change that. A misleading title is never a good idea.
LSU wrote:But... Your best chance right now to prove yourself as a developer, is not by adamantly defending Last Hope, but to make DUX an absolutely killer game. If it receives critical and commercial success then you'll have proved you can make a great product, and also that you can learn from past experiences and take constructive criticism on board. Wouldn't that the best 'revenge' of all?
Indeed. :P

Some people however will never understand Last Hope always seeing games made in europe as euroshmups even its it plays like Dodonpachi.
User avatar
Stormwatch
Posts: 2327
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 1:04 am
Location: Brazil
Contact:

Post by Stormwatch »

I don't see Last Hope as an euroshmup or whatever. I see it as the creation of someone who really loves R-Type, that's why it fails. There are some horis I really like, such as Sol-Deace, Border Down, Air Buster, Blazing Star... yet, I simply don't find R-Type enjoyable at all past the first stage!
Image
RHE
Posts: 547
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:16 pm

Post by RHE »

Stormwatch wrote:I see it as the creation of someone who really loves R-Type, that's why it fails.
It may fail for you but not per se. I also don't think that Sol-Deace is a very much beloved game but still you enjoy it. So does it fail per se?
User avatar
nimitz
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:05 am
Location: Québec

Post by nimitz »

I have nerver played Last Hope and don't really like R-type "style" games.

But what bothers me is :
Turrican wrote:I'd appreciate you defense of LH a lot more if you hadn't wrote something like "we programmers know why pads configuration must be fixed".
You seem to have a very hard time dealing with criticism, even when it is constructive.
User avatar
doctorx0079
Posts: 1277
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 4:16 pm
Location: Dayton, OH
Contact:

Post by doctorx0079 »

I really like R-Type so I would probably like Last Hope if I could get the chance to play it. It sounds good to me.

PS The bad guy on the cover is awesome.
SWY: Games are just for fun
User avatar
undamned
Posts: 3273
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Phoenix

Post by undamned »

LSU wrote:Your best chance right now to prove yourself as a developer, is not by adamantly defending Last Hope, but to make DUX an absolutely killer game. If it receives critical and commercial success then you'll have proved you can make a great product, and also that you can learn from past experiences and take constructive criticism on board. Wouldn't that the best 'revenge' of all? ;)
Quoted for truth.
-ud
Righteous Super Hero / Righteous Love
User avatar
shoe-sama
Banned User
Posts: 2723
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 1:15 am
Location: gobble gobble

Post by shoe-sama »

it's not so much that it's bad

it's more that you're not taking suggestions (as in ignoring most of the gameplay criticism) and making future games better

or at least that's what your posts suggest
<Sidwell> TSS is manlier than a jet figher made of biceps.
Post Reply