6th Annual Top 25 Shmups of All Time! - Discussion thread
-
henry dark
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:26 am
- Location: VFD
-
Shatterhand
- Posts: 4101
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:01 am
- Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
- Contact:
Wow, what the heck was that? I knew you rate it as one of the best (or it was the best?) Nes shmup, and probably your favourite compile shmup... but I wouldn't expect a Compile game at your top 25Rob wrote: [4] [Zanac]

Taking a quickly glance at the votes, I think Dodonpachi has a good contender this year........ Dodonpachi Dai-Ou-Jou .... duh, the irony

And this vote:
Puts the biggest smile on my facerolins wrote:[25] [Zanac (MSX)]
[24] [Batsugun]
[23] [Armed Police Batrider]
[22] [Super Laydock]
[21] [Gradius 2 (MSX)]
[20] [Espgaluda]
[19] [Dodonpachi DOJ]
[18] [Battle Garegga]
[17] [Salamander (MSX)]
[16] [Fire Shark]
[15] [Xevious Fradraut Densetsu]
[14] [Strikers 1945]
[13] [UN Squadron]
[12] [Gunbird]
[11] [Final Justice]
[10] [Dangun Feveron]
[9] [Soukyugerentai]
[8] [Image Fight]
[7] [Nexzr]
[6] [Tatsujin]
[5] [Kyukyoku Tiger]
[4] [ESP Ra.De.]
[3] [Daioh]
[2] [Shienryu]
[1] [Anaza Kaleidoscope Special]


-
Zebra Airforce
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 9:10 pm
In this case, how about giving one of your [1]-slots to Nexzr?NTSC-J wrote:I just wanted to list five but we have to do 25 I guess so the ones with [1] are in no particular order.

Last edited by Ceph on Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Shatterhand
- Posts: 4101
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:01 am
- Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
- Contact:
And you could go ahead an give one to Zanac Neo, other one to Gradius V, and other one to Space Manbow. And if you really feel like, put one more for Apidya.Ceph wrote:In this case, how about giving one of you [1]-slots to Nexzr?NTSC-J wrote:I just wanted to list five but we have to do 25 I guess so the ones with [1] are in no particular order.
Heh, this is getting funny.

Yeah! Right now all I really want is portable Zanac. Great music, nice puke purple/green/orange NES gfx, simple and frantic game.Shatterhand wrote:Wow, what the heck was that? I knew you rate it as one of the best (or it was the best?) Nes shmup, and probably your favourite compile shmup... but I wouldn't expect a Compile game at your top 25Rob wrote: [4] [Zanac]
Vote for Zanac, people.
Seriously, get a flashcart. I play Zanac on the bus all the time. Total cost: About $20.Rob wrote:Yeah! Right now all I really want is portable Zanac. Great music, nice puke purple/green/orange NES gfx, simple and frantic game.Shatterhand wrote:Wow, what the heck was that? I knew you rate it as one of the best (or it was the best?) Nes shmup, and probably your favourite compile shmup... but I wouldn't expect a Compile game at your top 25Rob wrote: [4] [Zanac]
Vote for Zanac, people.
-
DJ Incompetent
- Posts: 2377
- Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Murda Mitten, USA
I see you've branched from Ketsui.NTSC-J wrote:I just wanted to list five but we have to do 25 I guess so the ones with [1] are in no particular order.
9999, haha.
@shmups | superplaymixes Reworked Game Soundtracks | livestreamin'
______________________
I would give some [1]'s out to Nexzr, Zanac Neo and Manbow simply because they won't place high anyways so I don't have to worry about them encroaching on the five I want to win, but I haven't played them. I also refuse to support the more evil titles like Gradius V.Shatterhand wrote:And you could go ahead an give one to Zanac Neo, other one to Gradius V, and other one to Space Manbow. And if you really feel like, put one more for Apidya.Ceph wrote:In this case, how about giving one of you [1]-slots to Nexzr?NTSC-J wrote:I just wanted to list five but we have to do 25 I guess so the ones with [1] are in no particular order.
Heh, this is getting funny.
Just to make sure, we can only assign integers of 1-25, right? If any number was ok I'd give my top 5 games 9999's and .1's to the rest.
Gotta play to win!
-
Herr Schatten
- Posts: 3286
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:14 pm
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Since we've witnessed a lot of propositions on this thread aimed to limit people's freedom with their vote, I might as well suggest another one. It won't probably be well received and perhaps it's better so, but here it is.
A minimum post count required to vote. Quite minimum - like, an hundred posts.
Reasons why I think it would be good:
1) vote around these parts if you're a bit committed to this community. It wouldn't hurt. in an hundred posts or less, you might have posted your bio, you might have debated your favorite shmups, you might have angered someone with insane trolling - all things which would make you closer to an individual and farther to a fake account / votebot account.
Do you have a low post count? No worry - we're taking such a poll every march/april. Enjoy your time here, sip some cup of tea, play more shmups. Your list will be awesome next year.
EDIT:
A bit of statistics. Click "memberlist" sort for "total posts - descending".
We have 3452 users. (116 pages)
Last user with total posts 1 is no° 2380 "Aba'suto". From 2381 and on they are all total posts 0.
2380 / 2 = 1190
User no° 1190 "maxchainsplendid" has a total post count of 12.
Setting a minimum of twelve posts for vote would therefore slash potential voters among active members by 50%.
A minimum post count required to vote. Quite minimum - like, an hundred posts.
Reasons why I think it would be good:
1) vote around these parts if you're a bit committed to this community. It wouldn't hurt. in an hundred posts or less, you might have posted your bio, you might have debated your favorite shmups, you might have angered someone with insane trolling - all things which would make you closer to an individual and farther to a fake account / votebot account.
Do you have a low post count? No worry - we're taking such a poll every march/april. Enjoy your time here, sip some cup of tea, play more shmups. Your list will be awesome next year.
EDIT:
A bit of statistics. Click "memberlist" sort for "total posts - descending".
We have 3452 users. (116 pages)
Last user with total posts 1 is no° 2380 "Aba'suto". From 2381 and on they are all total posts 0.
2380 / 2 = 1190
User no° 1190 "maxchainsplendid" has a total post count of 12.
Setting a minimum of twelve posts for vote would therefore slash potential voters among active members by 50%.
Last edited by Turrican on Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:56 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
Shatterhand
- Posts: 4101
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:01 am
- Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
- Contact:
I can certainly see why you'd suggest this since (along with time elapsed since joining the site) it's pretty much the only hard numerical data we have on members. But here's my problem with that.Turrican wrote:A minimum post count required to vote. Quite minimum - like, an hundred posts.
The amount of posts someone makes on a forum doesn't really equate to, or prove anything on, how much experience they actually have playing these games. Do we then have to look at the actual quality of their posts to determine if they write critically valid comments, or are more like mere spam?
I've been avidly playing shmups for about 23 years, I've worked at a couple of games companies and I've also taught some game history and theory. I'm absolutely not saying that I'm a definitive expert on the subject or anything - I'm more of an aging fanboy, actually - and my vote is no more or less valuable than anyone else's. But I do have some reasonable experience with shmups, video games and digital media in general, and I only have 180 posts on this forum, which is not really that many at all. And I fully expect there are many other similar people on this forum.
Remember, we already have guidelines laid out in the thread about requirements for eligibility to post. Plus, as with any democratic vote - everyone's vote is valid, and that's the whole point, yes?
Ah, I guess you missed my point. I wasn't trying to measure post quality or personal experience with shmups. I was just talking about being committed to a community, writing here well... whatever.LSU wrote: The amount of posts someone makes on a forum doesn't really equate to, or prove anything on, how much experience they actually have playing these games. Do we then have to look at the actual quality of their posts to determine if they write critically valid comments, or are more like mere spam?
I might have people like Ghegs, oxtsu, incognoscente and others at one side of the quality spectrum and happy trollers like shoe-sama at the opposite side of it. But I value them the same when they vote.
What I'm afraid of is not an unexperienced player. I'm against someone who registers just to write the list, and then says nothing for years, maybe to never return on the forums again. I was suggesting to prevent this kind of situation.
not few at all. I can already say I "met" you and discussed with you. I remember your green puyo-jellylike avatar. In short, you are obviously been present on the forums enough.I only have 180 posts on this forum
I'd keep democracy out of a videogame poll - it's a word that draws controversy these days. Last year I could vote 99,99% for a single game, and list another hundred. This year, I must vote precisely for twentyfive and I have limitations where to assign weight. As you see, every poll (and democracy) is made of rules, so the devil is in the details.Plus, as with any democratic vote - everyone's vote is valid, and that's the whole point, yes?
Ahh, I see, I am sorry... That is indeed a great thing to advocate. And I obviously agree that reducing that kind of situation (registering just to write a list and then vanishing again) would be great.Turrican wrote:Ah, I guess you missed my point. I wasn't trying to measure post quality or personal experience with shmups. I was just talking about being committed to a community
And you remember the puyo? Wow...