438,570 - Nemo - Stage 4
OSM Week #1 - ThunderForce IV
I wasn't demanding that you need to justify your decissions. I just wanted to point out why I disagree with the way you are handling this tournament, just a bit criticism eh? But anyway, I guess I won't convince you nor will you convince me to anything. So I agree to disagree.Nemo wrote:LMAO.First when I don't reply to the comments I'm just cowering because I'm wrong, then I take to the time to actually explain my position and I'm overdefensive. Seriously, I feel like I'm a freakin' babysitter to you guys. I'm a grown man and I don't even have to administer this tournament. Either grow up and act like an adult, or quit and do both of us a favor. How's that for "overdefensive"?
-
mulletgeezer
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 4:02 pm
- Location: nottingham, england
I completely agree with the things Edge has said here. I also think the one life condition for this game was not a good one, it made the game less enjoyable and more frustrating - I assumed we were going to have special conditions that would change the nature of the game in an interesting way? Maybe next time.
That's really what this whole thing was about, it wasn't how this tournament was run, it was the fact a couple of people found this challenge too challenging. I happen to disagree, but everyone is entitled to their opinion. It shouldn't have matter none the less because everyone was playing on the same field. Fun isn't always going to be guaranteed folks (like everyone enjoyed every game in Edge's tourney), but your best bet is to embrace the challenges. The ironic thing is, the two biggest complainers are the ones that insisted I change the challenge mid-week in the first place. If they would have been smart, they would have PMed me with their concerns, in which instance I would have told them to play on. Perhaps the grass isn't always greener on the other side?
