pah, I was a Kempston-interface man early on.bcass wrote:At the time, I was a ZX Spectrum man. Most Spectrum owners didn't own a joystick as the early models didn't have joystick ports as standard. This lead to most owners using keys (usually redefinable). The most popular configuration was Q (up) A (down) O (left) P (right) and SPACE (fire). It was some years later that I started to really get used to joypads. I could only ever really use joysticks on arcade machines.
Amiga CD32 and Amiga 500/1200 Shoot Em Ups
-
dakidski
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 1:37 am
-
Shatterhand
- Posts: 4124
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:01 am
- Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
- Contact:
Bombed?bcass wrote:You should be grateful that Spectrum coders even bothered to support the MSX. It bombed in Europe.Shatterhand wrote:I used to love my MSX arrow keys configuration, it was perfect indeed. And I always hated when there was some ZX Spectrum port where they didn't bother to give me an option to play with the MSX arrow keys, so I had to stick with the worse QAOP-Space configuration.
I never liked this configuration too much. When one of those ports had the option to configure the controls but had no support for the MSX arrow keys, I would configure ZSXC + Space, always felt much better.
I think it was very popular in at least Netherlands, Spain and Russia.
Most Spectrum coders that made MSX versions were from Spain, and a couple from UK.

-
Shatterhand
- Posts: 4124
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:01 am
- Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
- Contact:
We are going way off-topic, but...
Really? I know MSXs were use a lot in schools, that Russian space-station also had an MSX on board. The USSR was the first country to use the MSX computer for serious stuff.
Anyway, this isn't very important. I know the C64 and Spectrum were much more popular, but the MSX had its share of the European 8-bits market too
Really? I know MSXs were use a lot in schools, that Russian space-station also had an MSX on board. The USSR was the first country to use the MSX computer for serious stuff.
Anyway, this isn't very important. I know the C64 and Spectrum were much more popular, but the MSX had its share of the European 8-bits market too

-
bcass
- Posts: 2688
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:10 am
Like you say, in a few spots in Europe, it found a niche. Without question though, the biggest home computer in the 80s and well into the 90s in Russia/USSR were the Spectrum clones. The Spectrum had an incredibly simple hardware design that was cheap to clone. It also had a large existing user/software base. I live in the UK, but have friends who were brought-up in former USSR countries, which is where the info come from.
-
Super Laydock
- Posts: 3094
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:24 pm
- Location: Latis / Netherlands
Which might be the main reason for you thinking MSX bombed in Europe.bcass wrote:I live in the UK
In those days I always bought UK games magazines (like C &VG) and I was always surprised there being almost no mention of the MSX at all (even game ads almost never mentioned an MSX version even if there was one). I doubt many people (even the ones interested in computers and games) even knew it existed.
In the meantime here in the Netherlands there was huge scene (and actually there still is a fair number of enthousiast and MSX clubs). This was of course helped by the fact that Philips (being a Dutch company) made it's own MSX computers and had a great penetration in terms of dealers. The vast majority (possibly 90% even, but that's a guess as I have no real figures) are Philips MSX computers.
I'd say (a guess) C64 had a bit more users, but MSX most certainly wasn't far of.
All in all I believe that outside Japan, the Netherlands, Brazil, Spain, France and possibly Italy were the biggest markets.
It's quite hard to tell how much of a succes it was in Russia, but it was popular there (maybe less then the spectrum, maybe more I really can't say. All I know is the USSR is VERY big so what was popular in Moskou, might be less popular in Vladiwostok).
And did you know there even was a special Arabic MSX!?
Finally I remember reading in a MSX magazine those days that the 1 million barrier in Europe was broken through. And it is probably worth mentioning that for these days that was quite much for a homecomputer (with competition from other homecoputers and NES, Master System were there too).
Barroom hero!
Bathroom hero!
Bathroom hero!
-
bcass
- Posts: 2688
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:10 am
I own an MSX too. Quite a nice Yamaha one with Midi keyboard actually. Most people knew about them in the UK, they just didn't care about them. It didn't do anything the Spectrum and the C64 weren't already doing quite well when it arrived. More importantly, the C64 and the Spectrum had a richer catalogue of original games, whereas the MSX seemed to become a home to coin-op conversions.
Russia is the biggest country in the World (even after the break-up of the former USSR) whose overall computer sales would constitute a large portion of Europes computer sales. Of course, most Spectrums sold there were clones and not official, but I still count that as Spectrum ownership. If sales of all those clones were added to official Spectrum sales, it would almost certainly dwarf C64 worldwide sales, never mind MSX sales.
Like I said, I knew that the MSX was popular in pockets of Europe (and some parts of South America too) but in Europe, overall, compared to the other 8-bit machines (C64, Spectrum, CPC) it bombed.
Russia is the biggest country in the World (even after the break-up of the former USSR) whose overall computer sales would constitute a large portion of Europes computer sales. Of course, most Spectrums sold there were clones and not official, but I still count that as Spectrum ownership. If sales of all those clones were added to official Spectrum sales, it would almost certainly dwarf C64 worldwide sales, never mind MSX sales.
Like I said, I knew that the MSX was popular in pockets of Europe (and some parts of South America too) but in Europe, overall, compared to the other 8-bit machines (C64, Spectrum, CPC) it bombed.
-
Super Laydock
- Posts: 3094
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:24 pm
- Location: Latis / Netherlands
If only you left out CPC and changed "bombed" into had quite less machines per 1000 Europeans" I might agree.bcass wrote:but in Europe, overall, compared to the other 8-bit machines (C64, Spectrum, CPC) it bombed.
Amstrad.
edit:
*just rembered the GX 4000 and 4 games stored away in the back of the closet. Why o why did I ever buy this. Damn ebay! O-o
Barroom hero!
Bathroom hero!
Bathroom hero!
-
Turrican
- Posts: 4735
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:28 am
- Location: Landorin
- Contact:
The rest of what you say is reasonable, but this part isn't - Russia is the biggest country in the world, but I doubt they sold many spectrum in Siberia. Even if spectrum clones did spread in the USSR block, I doubt it would shift the total european sales significantly in favor of Spectrum. It may have been used in universities and research centres, and among the richest part of the population - which sadly wouldn't make a grand total. At least, that's what I suppose.bcass wrote:Russia is the biggest country in the World (even after the break-up of the former USSR) whose overall computer sales would constitute a large portion of Europes computer sales. Of course, most Spectrums sold there were clones and not official, but I still count that as Spectrum ownership. If sales of all those clones were added to official Spectrum sales, it would almost certainly dwarf C64 worldwide sales, never mind MSX sales.
I for sure would love to know more about it - the only bit I red was a retro gamer article, by our forum member Szczepaniak, iirc.
-
Ceph
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 2:58 pm
- Location: Europe
I wonder why anyone ever chose Spectrum over C64, 8bit Atari, MSX, CPC etc. What was Richard Altwasser thinking when he selected a graphics chip that could display only two simultaneous colors per 8×8 pixels? That was pretty pathetic even in 1982.
Back on topic: Deluxe Galaga is a pretty neat shareware shmup for Amiga 1200/CD32.
Back on topic: Deluxe Galaga is a pretty neat shareware shmup for Amiga 1200/CD32.
-
Turrican
- Posts: 4735
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:28 am
- Location: Landorin
- Contact:
Never played it, but sounds lovely. it290 is a great fan of that game:Ceph wrote:Deluxe Galaga is a pretty neat shareware shmup for Amiga 1200/CD32.
http://shmups.system11.org/viewtopic.php?t=7620
Since we're into amiga shmups, I also recommend this thread, MJR's retrospective:
http://shmups.system11.org/viewtopic.php?t=6807
-
Super Laydock
- Posts: 3094
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:24 pm
- Location: Latis / Netherlands
And since were back on topic...
What about Pegasus!?

Quite a nice game! Partly shmup and partly platform/beat em up.

And kick ass rocking tunes!
I actually bought this game after having tried it on a magazine demo disk.
And I can tell you guys, I did not buy many Amiga games.
What about Pegasus!?

Quite a nice game! Partly shmup and partly platform/beat em up.

And kick ass rocking tunes!
I actually bought this game after having tried it on a magazine demo disk.
And I can tell you guys, I did not buy many Amiga games.
Barroom hero!
Bathroom hero!
Bathroom hero!
-
Shatterhand
- Posts: 4124
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:01 am
- Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
- Contact:
-
bcass
- Posts: 2688
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:10 am
Pegasus looks ace. I haven't heard of/seen that one before.
It was pathetic, but it kept the hardware very very cheap (compared to all the other 8-bit home computers). This is a vital issue when you look at the growth of home computers in Europe in the early 1980s. What is even more astonishing is how coders overcame these limitations of the hardware to produce some stunningly original games.Ceph wrote:I wonder why anyone ever chose Spectrum over C64, 8bit Atari, MSX, CPC etc. What was Richard Altwasser thinking when he selected a graphics chip that could display only two simultaneous colors per 8×8 pixels? That was pretty pathetic even in 1982.
-
bcass
- Posts: 2688
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:10 am
This isn't true. The Spectrum clones were very widespread throughout Russia/USSR, and not just in academic institutions either. The shere variety of Spectrum clones indicates that there was a substantial home market for them. My friends in Russia/former USSR countries owned Spectrum clones. They certainly did not come from middle-class or wealthy families.Turrican wrote:Russia is the biggest country in the world, but I doubt they sold many spectrum in Siberia. Even if spectrum clones did spread in the USSR block, I doubt it would shift the total european sales significantly in favor of Spectrum. It may have been used in universities and research centres, and among the richest part of the population - which sadly wouldn't make a grand total. At least, that's what I suppose.
-
Turrican
- Posts: 4735
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:28 am
- Location: Landorin
- Contact:
I didn't deny substantial home market - I just doubted that those sales figures would be enough that if added to Spectrum sold in the west, the total would surpass the grand total of C64 sales in the western europe.bcass wrote:This isn't true. The Spectrum clones were very widespread throughout Russia/USSR, and not just in academic institutions either. The shere variety of Spectrum clones indicates that there was a substantial home market for them. My friends in Russia/former USSR countries owned Spectrum clones. They certainly did not come from middle-class or wealthy families.Turrican wrote:Russia is the biggest country in the world, but I doubt they sold many spectrum in Siberia. Even if spectrum clones did spread in the USSR block, I doubt it would shift the total european sales significantly in favor of Spectrum. It may have been used in universities and research centres, and among the richest part of the population - which sadly wouldn't make a grand total. At least, that's what I suppose.
Substantial home market has little to do with Russia's dimensions as a country.
Anyway, as I said, I'd love to know more.
-
bcass
- Posts: 2688
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:10 am
Well, according to Wikipedia, the former USSR had the 3rd largest population of any country on Earth. As of 1991, it was 293,047,571: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UssrTurrican wrote:I didn't deny substantial home market - I just doubted that those sales figures would be enough that if added to Spectrum sold in the west, the total would surpass the grand total of C64 sales in the western europe.
Substantial home market has little to do with Russia's dimensions as a country.
Anyway, as I said, I'd love to know more.
Even if just a small fraction of those people bought a Spectrum, we're still talking about substantial sales figures.
-
Turrican
- Posts: 4735
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:28 am
- Location: Landorin
- Contact:
people into home computers already are a fraction - the problem is to understand if home computer diffusion in the soviet bloc was comparable in terms of sales and penetration to the western phenomena. Ah, we'll probably never know for sure...bcass wrote:Well, according to Wikipedia, the former USSR had the 3rd largest population of any country on Earth. As of 1991, it was 293,047,571: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UssrTurrican wrote:I didn't deny substantial home market - I just doubted that those sales figures would be enough that if added to Spectrum sold in the west, the total would surpass the grand total of C64 sales in the western europe.
Substantial home market has little to do with Russia's dimensions as a country.
Anyway, as I said, I'd love to know more.
Even if just a small fraction of those people bought a Spectrum, we're still talking about substantial sales figures.
-
ParegoricKid
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:51 pm
Thanks Turrican for pointing out that Russia isn't the biggest (population) country in the world. Offtopic anyway I know but I gotta say it's all speculation on both parts. bcass, before you show me some credible source with figures about clone sales in the former UDSSR I won't believe it exceeded (together with western sales) sales of C-64. Of course there are no such "official" figures so it's all speculation. The fact that you have friends in Russia who owned such clones and knew many others is hardly representative for the hole Ex-UDSSR.
I read about said clones and by chance once found a Speccy fansite with lots of collected clones pics; it was a pretty interesting sight. Apparently some clones were even used in schools, like in St.Petersburg. But I also read about MSX use in russian schools and offices. Of course most famous is the MSX on board of the MIR space station.
And I'm with Ceph regarding the MSX compared to the Spectrum. MSX had better sound&graphics and a great Basic. True is that the available games for C-64 and Spectrum were huge in numbers but when you count the games intended for the japanese market in you have quite an impressive choice of good games. I used to get them trough my contact in the Netherlands who got them disks directly from Japan. And there were some great companies producing games for the MSX, especially Konami had a great games library.
The MSX scene was huge in the Netherlands and Spain but also very popular in France, Germany, Switzerland and Austria. To this day you'll find german MSX-Clubs producing new soft- and hardware for example.
For sure the hole MSX project was a very ambitious one and with all their power an dmoney these huge companies had good premises to overtake the homecomputer market but they failed because each company ould cook their own soup so to speak and not really join forces in marketing campaigns and fruther development.
@Shatterhand: What kind of MSX model did you own?
I read about said clones and by chance once found a Speccy fansite with lots of collected clones pics; it was a pretty interesting sight. Apparently some clones were even used in schools, like in St.Petersburg. But I also read about MSX use in russian schools and offices. Of course most famous is the MSX on board of the MIR space station.
And I'm with Ceph regarding the MSX compared to the Spectrum. MSX had better sound&graphics and a great Basic. True is that the available games for C-64 and Spectrum were huge in numbers but when you count the games intended for the japanese market in you have quite an impressive choice of good games. I used to get them trough my contact in the Netherlands who got them disks directly from Japan. And there were some great companies producing games for the MSX, especially Konami had a great games library.
The MSX scene was huge in the Netherlands and Spain but also very popular in France, Germany, Switzerland and Austria. To this day you'll find german MSX-Clubs producing new soft- and hardware for example.
For sure the hole MSX project was a very ambitious one and with all their power an dmoney these huge companies had good premises to overtake the homecomputer market but they failed because each company ould cook their own soup so to speak and not really join forces in marketing campaigns and fruther development.
@Shatterhand: What kind of MSX model did you own?
-
ParegoricKid
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:51 pm
But back to topic: All shooters worth mentioning are in this thread already imo. I second votes for Uridium 2, Xenon 2 Megablast, Hybris and Banshee.
Also I gotta mention other classics like Chaos Engine (a MUST in every Amiga collection), Worms, Turrican 2. Or try Katakis once.
Further classics (but non shooters) are the Monkey Island and Indiana Jones adventure series, the Settlers or Elite Frontier.
Btw, if you (or someone else) are interested, I still own some original Amiga games and a bunch of copied Amiga 500 games, about 50 disks. My old Amiga 500 is collecting dust together with an old Atari ST and I guess I won't install them anymore so I have no more ned for the games really.
@Shatterhand: You mentioned the article about packing this game into a mere 96Kb. I was always amazed what the coders back then could do on their respective machines. They HAD to squeeze the last little bit out of the CPU/Memory and many of them like the Ultima Play the Game guys or Bitmap Bros. were wizards in accomplishing exactely this.
Today you have an armada of coders and whatnot and they have huge amounts of memory available, it leads often to sloppy coding. Read an article recently where Jon Ritmann (I believe it was) commented on this and the difference to the good 'ol days.
Also I gotta mention other classics like Chaos Engine (a MUST in every Amiga collection), Worms, Turrican 2. Or try Katakis once.
Further classics (but non shooters) are the Monkey Island and Indiana Jones adventure series, the Settlers or Elite Frontier.
Btw, if you (or someone else) are interested, I still own some original Amiga games and a bunch of copied Amiga 500 games, about 50 disks. My old Amiga 500 is collecting dust together with an old Atari ST and I guess I won't install them anymore so I have no more ned for the games really.
@Shatterhand: You mentioned the article about packing this game into a mere 96Kb. I was always amazed what the coders back then could do on their respective machines. They HAD to squeeze the last little bit out of the CPU/Memory and many of them like the Ultima Play the Game guys or Bitmap Bros. were wizards in accomplishing exactely this.
Today you have an armada of coders and whatnot and they have huge amounts of memory available, it leads often to sloppy coding. Read an article recently where Jon Ritmann (I believe it was) commented on this and the difference to the good 'ol days.
-
bcass
- Posts: 2688
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:10 am
That was the problem with the MSX though - it only had strong software support from the Japanese, and even then most of that was on expensive cartridges (yes, I know there were tapes and disks too, but predominantly it was a cart-based machine).
Indeed, the hardware was pretty good, but it had it's flaws - just look at the state of the scrolling in the Gradius games. I never saw scrolling that bad in any Spectrum game, and the Spectrum had no hardware scrolling. In fact, it had no custom chips (prior to the 128K models which added the AY sound chip). It's a daft thing for you to state anyway that the MSX was technically better than the Spectrum. Of course it was, it was released after the Spedtrum. The XBox360 is technically better than the Dreamcast, but that doesn't mean that there aren't any good games on the Dreamcast.
In addition, I wasn't basing evidence on the popularity of the Spectrum in the former USSR merely on the fact that a few of my friends owned them. Feedback from these friends indicates that lots of people owned them, simply because they were cheap. They were cheap because the Spectrum is little more than a Z80 CPU with a keyboard. And despite the fact that Russia doesn't have the biggest population in the World (something I never actually said) it's population is vast enough to significantly increase the number of Worldwide sales of the Spectrum. It is estimated that there were over 6 million Spectrum sales in the UK alone (and that's before Amstrad bought the company and continued to sell the Spectrum for another 8 years). Add to that figure, sales in the rest of the World (not least units sold in the former USSR) and it wouldn't be hard to imagine that the Spectrum came close to or even outsold the C64 (total Worlwide sales). Official Commodore Worldwide sales figures for the C64 (publsihed in their annual report) stand at a total of 17 million units.
Indeed, the hardware was pretty good, but it had it's flaws - just look at the state of the scrolling in the Gradius games. I never saw scrolling that bad in any Spectrum game, and the Spectrum had no hardware scrolling. In fact, it had no custom chips (prior to the 128K models which added the AY sound chip). It's a daft thing for you to state anyway that the MSX was technically better than the Spectrum. Of course it was, it was released after the Spedtrum. The XBox360 is technically better than the Dreamcast, but that doesn't mean that there aren't any good games on the Dreamcast.
In addition, I wasn't basing evidence on the popularity of the Spectrum in the former USSR merely on the fact that a few of my friends owned them. Feedback from these friends indicates that lots of people owned them, simply because they were cheap. They were cheap because the Spectrum is little more than a Z80 CPU with a keyboard. And despite the fact that Russia doesn't have the biggest population in the World (something I never actually said) it's population is vast enough to significantly increase the number of Worldwide sales of the Spectrum. It is estimated that there were over 6 million Spectrum sales in the UK alone (and that's before Amstrad bought the company and continued to sell the Spectrum for another 8 years). Add to that figure, sales in the rest of the World (not least units sold in the former USSR) and it wouldn't be hard to imagine that the Spectrum came close to or even outsold the C64 (total Worlwide sales). Official Commodore Worldwide sales figures for the C64 (publsihed in their annual report) stand at a total of 17 million units.
-
Michaelm
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 1:13 am
- Location: Western ignorant scum country
-
Ceph
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 2:58 pm
- Location: Europe
-
Turrican
- Posts: 4735
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:28 am
- Location: Landorin
- Contact:
It's quite a leap, even reducing those 17 million units to just the european sales figures. If Russia had been a market so big on its own, now Europe would be the first of the three markets by a large margin. Take the UK 6 million Spectrum: UK was and still is by far the most prominent market for videogames in the whole EU. I don't think Spain, Netherlands, Italy and France together would have piled up another 6 million. Same goes for the C64 of course.bcass wrote: It is estimated that there were over 6 million Spectrum sales in the UK alone (and that's before Amstrad bought the company and continued to sell the Spectrum for another 8 years). Add to that figure, sales in the rest of the World (not least units sold in the former USSR) and it wouldn't be hard to imagine that the Spectrum came close to or even outsold the C64 (total Worlwide sales). Official Commodore Worldwide sales figures for the C64 (publsihed in their annual report) stand at a total of 17 million units.
I'd be impressed to know that Spectrums in the whole USSR reached a 6 million total, equal to the UK. Of course all of this is speaking of hardware alone - games are all another matter altogether.
-
Daigohji
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 2:09 pm
- Location: England
Times were hard, and it was cheaper. On a personal level, it was also the easiest to find games for locally. Back in 1988 I wouldn't have dreamed of paying the crazy expensive £9.99 that mail order games in mag ads charged for new releases. Ditto the big high street chain stores; WH Smith being one of the few I recall carrying games back then. But the thing that it's easy to forget in the current market is that computer games were everywhere back in the 8-bit era. A substantial chunk of my old Spectrum games collection was bought from newsagents and corner shops. The average price of a budget Speccy game around here was £1.99, while C64 games averaged £2.99. When I was a kid subsisting on £1.50 per week, it was a big difference.Ceph wrote:I wonder why anyone ever chose Spectrum over C64, 8bit Atari, MSX, CPC etc.
IIRC, the way playground politics broke down was: if you had a Speccy you were a man; a C64 and you were a King; a CPC 464 and you were a God. Such things as Atari STs and Amigas were only gazed at longingly in those mocking multi-platform ads that appeared in games mags.
As for the MSX, the first time I ever heard of it was 1998, when I found out that there were Metal Gear games before Solid. If the MSX had a marketing budget in the UK, it sure as hell wasn't focused on pulling in the gamer demographics. Was it pushed as an office machine or something? It certainly couldn't have been used in schools much, since the humble BBC Micro dominated that market.

-
bcass
- Posts: 2688
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:10 am
-
bcass
- Posts: 2688
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:10 am
You have to look at how many other countries the Sepctrum was popular in (not just the USSR countries). Also remember that that 6 million sales figure was prior to Amstrad buying the brand. The Speccy enjoyed about another 8 years of sales to add to that. A realistic final total sales figure for the UK would be around 8 million, pehaps more.Turrican wrote:It's quite a leap, even reducing those 17 million units to just the european sales figures. If Russia had been a market so big on its own, now Europe would be the first of the three markets by a large margin. Take the UK 6 million Spectrum: UK was and still is by far the most prominent market for videogames in the whole EU. I don't think Spain, Netherlands, Italy and France together would have piled up another 6 million. Same goes for the C64 of course.
I'd be impressed to know that Spectrums in the whole USSR reached a 6 million total, equal to the UK. Of course all of this is speaking of hardware alone - games are all another matter altogether.
Interestingly, the Spectrum was released as the 'Timex' in the US, and aparently 150,000 of them were sold there, so at least the Speccy gets some covered in the US!
By the way, to those who have raised the issue - this isn't a computer wars issue, we're merely discussing sales figures. This has nothing to do with the age-old 'computer x is better than computer y'. That said, it might be a good idea to split this topic-up.