They did!Sima Tuna wrote:I mean, at least we could fucking try it
...for rats.
I agree with Kyle on this one, any slogan where you have to define terms to explain what you're trying to say is a bad slogan.Air Master Burst wrote:"Private property" and "personal property" are two entirely distinct and different concepts. You can still own stuff, but a lot of people would own a bit more and a few people would own a whole lot less.
BryanM wrote:I agree with Kyle on this one, any slogan where you have to define terms to explain what you're trying to say is a bad slogan.
It's not my slogan, it's a deeper dive into my beliefs. My slogan is closer to "Free shit for everyone!"BryanM wrote:I agree with Kyle on this one, any slogan where you have to define terms to explain what you're trying to say is a bad slogan.Air Master Burst wrote:"Private property" and "personal property" are two entirely distinct and different concepts. You can still own stuff, but a lot of people would own a bit more and a few people would own a whole lot less.
And that’s a dumbass slogan!Air Master Burst wrote:. My slogan is closer to "Free shit for everyone!"
Whereas the current mainstream slogan, "Do with less so we can give free shit to this guy:"Hoagtech wrote:And that’s a dumbass slogan!Air Master Burst wrote:. My slogan is closer to "Free shit for everyone!"
You guys should run this guys clothes business the way you adore this “puffy” manMischief Maker wrote:Whereas the current mainstream slogan, "Do with less so we can give free shit to this guy:"Hoagtech wrote:And that’s a dumbass slogan!Air Master Burst wrote:. My slogan is closer to "Free shit for everyone!"
Based and redpilled!
You do realize this is essentially another version of the kindergarten-caliber "calling someone else racist is worse than actually being racist" canard; just replace "racist" with "plutocratic". Folks like yourself are the ones constantly and proudly bankrolling and empowering people like him in exchange for the "personal freedom" to treat other people like trash without anyone being able to so much as criticize you for it; the reason you see reminders of that so frequently is because you keep on doing it.Hoagtech wrote:You guys should run this guys clothes business the way you adore this “puffy” man
Ah, the ruse where you pretend to care about the environment so you can implement/force communism without the plebs suspecting anything until they starve and trample each other, just like every other time. There is no such thing as a free lunch.Air Master Burst wrote:late-stage capitalism that is LITERALLY DESTROYING THE PLANET.
RegalSin wrote:Street Fighters. We need to aviod them when we activate time accellerator.
Demonstrably false!emphatic wrote:There is no such thing as a free lunch.
Ooh, do you have more of these? I love this stuff.emphatic wrote:Ah, the ruse where you pretend to care about the environment so you can implement/force communism without the plebs suspecting anything until they starve and trample each other, just like every other time.
orange808 wrote:Know why I hate Hillary? That asshole poisoned the well.
When I ask you guys to dial it back from impossible communism to attainable socialism, her bullshit disingenuous claims of what it is "realistic" (and is not) get in the way. I can't even ask anyone to take a step back from idealism, because she already redefined the word "realistic"; thanks to that asshole, we can't even have a conversation.
Fuck.
Of course. typical cucktard reply..BulletMagnet wrote:You do realize this is essentially another version of the kindergarten-caliber "calling someone else racist is worse than actually being racist" canard; just replace "racist" with "plutocratic". Folks like yourself are the ones constantly and proudly bankrolling and empowering people like him in exchange for the "personal freedom" to treat other people like trash without anyone being able to so much as criticize you for it; the reason you see reminders of that so frequently is because you keep on doing it.Hoagtech wrote:You guys should run this guys clothes business the way you adore this “puffy” man
Hoagtech wrote:The root of the problem is your lazy and not smart with finances.
Who needs to do any actual research when you can just ask them how ethical they are? And yet somehow I'm supposed to be the naive one here.Hoagtech wrote:Dave Ramsey Has been running a podcast for the last 30 years which is the third most listened to podcast in America and interviewed 100's of millionaires to gather a consensus. He noticed the key factor in Deca-millionaires was "extraordinary ethics".
Or you know you could.. become one seeing as how we live in the land of milk and honey. There's a chessboard in front of us. Might as well play some goddamn chess..Air Master Burst wrote:Who needs to do any actual research when you can just ask them how ethical they are? And yet somehow I'm supposed to be the naive one here.Hoagtech wrote:Dave Ramsey Has been running a podcast for the last 30 years which is the third most listened to podcast in America and interviewed 100's of millionaires to gather a consensus. He noticed the key factor in Deca-millionaires was "extraordinary ethics".
Eat the rich, they're probably well-marbled.
Talking about endpoints is just a way to kill the massive amount of free time we have. It's an extremely narrow niche that expects full communism now. The dissolution of all governments is quite obviously a fantasy that would turn us back to the ~1910's immediately if enacted tomorrow. Monopoly money, child slavery, etc etc. I guess the tankies wouldn't mind that, granted.orange808 wrote:When I ask you guys to dial it back from impossible communism to attainable socialism, her bullshit disingenuous claims of what it is "realistic" (and is not) get in the way.
As Mischief said, literally anything that improves society somewhat will be gaslit and fought against by the ruling class as hard as possible.I can't even ask anyone to take a step back from idealism, because she already redefined the word "realistic"; thanks to that asshole, we can't even have a conversation.
I love how you assume anyone who identifies as a socialist is bad with finances. I live quite comfortably and don't need to worry about retirement. I just also happen to have this thing called "empathy" for my fellow humans who aren't so lucky. You ought to try it out sometime.Hoagtech wrote: YOU deserve it Air Master Burst, and I thank you for your service btw. That's a sacrifice I was not willing to make in my lifetime and coincidentally, My brother is an Iraq and Afghanistan veteran who also believes in Socialism and is terrible with his finances.
BryanM wrote:In the meantime, basic shit like healthcare is an easy consensus. One small step forward to utopia.
A beautiful world where, say, my mother didn't almost die from her intestines fucking dying just because she was scared about the hospital bill.
According to our fash friends here, she's just a stupid broad who didn't save the $400,000 like she should have.
Quoted because they're great quotes.Sima Tuna wrote: I'm not saying all trespassing laws should be repealed. But what I am saying is there should always be *somewhere* these homeless people can go where it is not illegal for them to simply exist.
Ahh yes the "Shame card". I forgot to mention that one when you were slicing me with those Gambit cards.Air Master Burst wrote:I love how you assume anyone who identifies as a socialist is bad with finances. I live quite comfortably and don't need to worry about retirement. I just also happen to have this thing called "empathy" for my fellow humans who aren't so lucky. You ought to try it out sometime.Hoagtech wrote: YOU deserve it Air Master Burst, and I thank you for your service btw. That's a sacrifice I was not willing to make in my lifetime and coincidentally, My brother is an Iraq and Afghanistan veteran who also believes in Socialism and is terrible with his finances.
I left a clause in there for basic social services for this very reason. I wont relinquish personal info on my life growing up too much, but I do believe woman (especially those with children), should be provided for.BryanM wrote:In the meantime, basic shit like healthcare is an easy consensus. One small step forward to utopia.
A beautiful world where, say, my mother didn't almost die from her intestines fucking dying just because she was scared about the hospital bill.
According to our fash friends here, she's just a stupid broad who didn't save the $400,000 like she should have.
Are there no shelters in your city?Sima Tuna wrote:I'm not saying all trespassing laws should be repealed. But what I am saying is there should always be *somewhere* these homeless people can go where it is not illegal for them to simply exist.
Stop all the ridiculous military spending and tax the shit out of corporations and the top 1% and suddenly that stuff is easy to pay for.Hoagtech wrote:
And waving the magic FREE wand wont solve the same "feel good" policies like.. Open borders, Universal healthcare, Essential provisions, and in the case of of healthcare the hypochondriacs would dry up the resources overnight
Air Master Burst wrote:Stop all the ridiculous military spending and tax the shit out of corporations and the top 1% and suddenly that stuff is easy to pay for.Hoagtech wrote:
And waving the magic FREE wand wont solve the same "feel good" policies like.. Open borders, Universal healthcare, Essential provisions, and in the case of of healthcare the hypochondriacs would dry up the resources overnight
Imagine a world where Musk spent all those billions to house some homeless people instead of flushing it away on Twitter.
Now imagine a world where he never even had the option because we used it all on that stuff instead of him.
Are you deliberately trying to quote Ebenezer Scrooge right before Christmas time?Rob wrote:Are there no shelters in your city?Sima Tuna wrote:I'm not saying all trespassing laws should be repealed. But what I am saying is there should always be *somewhere* these homeless people can go where it is not illegal for them to simply exist.