Umm... Ronald Reagan?BryanM wrote: "Hey Joe, what was the name of the president back when you were vice president?"

Umm... Ronald Reagan?BryanM wrote: "Hey Joe, what was the name of the president back when you were vice president?"
i'm sorry, but after the last 10+ years of bullshit, i just have a really hard time seeing the good in all of this. i predict Warren will endorse Biden just for the sake of taking down Bernie, and then it will be Biden vs. Trump in the end, and the electoral college is going to pick Biden or Trump because they would never pick a candidate who is so vocal about the ills of capitalism when it's in the best interest of politicians and the rich to keep the status quo going. the people who are voting for Biden are not going to vote for anybody except Biden even if he has a heart attack during a speech in two days and despite all of the awful policies that he has directly been involved in contributing to for decades.Mischief Maker wrote:Hey guys, put the razor blades down.
Biden has a slim lead over Bernie after all the Super Tuesday red states, but Bernie crushed him in California. Now that Warren's out, Joe won't be able to hide his obvious and growing senility in the debates by the network keeping the debate camera focused on the kid's table squabbles. Instead of Bernie clinching the nomination from the start, it's now a legit race along the lines of 2008. Bernie's in a much better position now than he was at this point in 2016, and he nearly caught Hillary that time.
The brokered convention shenanigans are now off the table and it's a two person race, to be decided by raw numbers of butts in the seats. Do you have the Bern app? Do you know that you can make calls for Bernie from the comfort of your own home? If you've never done door canvassing, it's substantially less scary the first time if you do it with a friend.
The MSM wants you to think it's over already, don't let them manufacture your consent.
I perused an op-ed the other day which mulled over whether or not any of the subsequent generations are really any more willing to forego creature comforts for the greater good (i.e. eat less meat or not adjust the thermostat as much to slow climate change), especially if it's the government or some other authority figure requiring us to do it - as glad as I am to see Bloomberg make a quick exit from the race, the backlash to his restriction on vat-sized sodas back when he was mayor was just as ridiculous as the one to Obama's attempt to phase out less efficient light bulbs, because doing so infringed on our most vital freedoms.quash wrote:Above all else, boomers care about one thing and one thing alone: themselves.
You misspelled "laughably obvious and willfully ignored open deception".A rare moment of self awareness
Sure. That's where the challenge of climate bargains begins.BulletMagnet wrote:I perused an op-ed the other day which mulled over whether or not any of the subsequent generations are really any more willing to forego creature comforts for the greater good (i.e. eat less meat or not adjust the thermostat as much to slow climate change), especially if it's the government or some other authority figure requiring us to do it - as glad as I am to see Bloomberg make a quick exit from the race, the backlash to his restriction on vat-sized sodas back when he was mayor was just as ridiculous as the one to Obama's attempt to phase out less efficient light bulbs, because doing so infringed on our most vital freedoms.quash wrote:Above all else, boomers care about one thing and one thing alone: themselves.
You misspelled "laughably obvious and willfully ignored open deception".A rare moment of self awareness
The laughable part is all of that would do absolutely nothing.BulletMagnet wrote:I perused an op-ed the other day which mulled over whether or not any of the subsequent generations are really any more willing to forego creature comforts for the greater good (i.e. eat less meat or not adjust the thermostat as much to slow climate change)quash wrote:Above all else, boomers care about one thing and one thing alone: themselves.
The liberals acting as if it's some great victory for humanity make one wonder if they have developed object permanence - just because mommy hides under the blankets doesn't mean she's not still there.as glad as I am to see Bloomberg make a quick exit from the race
BulletMagnet wrote:I perused an op-ed the other day which mulled over whether or not any of the subsequent generations are really any more willing to forego creature comforts for the greater good (i.e. eat less meat or not adjust the thermostat as much to slow climate change)
Look, when the alternative is a Clinton vs Bush election, literally anyone else starts to look appealing. Make no mistake, Trump ended many a political career in those primary debates. It's funny to see people who weren't paying attention back then discover how on point Trump was during those debates, because now they get why he won.You misspelled "laughably obvious and willfully ignored open deception".
A reminder to everyone that the water-cooled reactors were developed by the government to power submarines. The tech was given to for-profit entities, who immediately locked down further research for nuclear power. Thorium was an extremely promising avenue, and the Nixon administration shut it down on the behest of these capital interests.quash wrote:but I blame The Simpsons for giving people the idea that nuclear energy is some guy fumbling with a fuel rod.
The point is, if what we really need is even bigger changes to make any real difference, and our own generation has shown itself largely unwilling to adopt even such meager "symbolic" gestures, perhaps we need to reconsider the wisdom of labeling the selfishness of our predecessors as some sort of outlier.quash wrote:To echo the sentiment of the others, these kinds of symbolic gestures aren't going to do much in the grand scheme of things.
It's always been obvious why he won, namely because nobody who voted for him did so for the reasons they say they did, hence the fact that he's taken a massive, steaming shit on everything his base claims to stand for but still has a 90 percent approval rating among Republicans (and presumably similar numbers among conservatives in general, not to mention "centrists" who went for him in 2016).because now they get why he won.
Nope. Thorium is effectively a magic bullet.BulletMagnet wrote:As for nuclear energy, that would have surely helped with some of the issues we're now facing, albeit by introducing and/or intensifying others.
Yes, Hillary Clinton was a horrible candidate who intentionally lost the election. Just like Mr.Biden is designed to do.It's always been obvious why he won
BulletMagnet wrote:perhaps we need to reconsider the wisdom of labeling the selfishness of our predecessors as some sort of outlier.
I don't know if such a thing is possible, but I can't help but wonder if anyone has ever attempted to simulate that election's outcome if Swift Boat Veterans for Truth hadn't happened, to say nothing of the years-long Benghazi/Comey clown show, or for that matter the "liberal" media's similarly prolonged embrace of "Al Gore said he invented the internet".BryanM wrote:Kerry loses to Bush.
From what I read, other countries have made greater investments in Thorium research and its applications than we have; if this is indeed such a game-changer, are we as a nation willing to sacrifice anything in exchange for the ability to catch up? Is anyone even looking into the possibility? Has anyone even suggested it?Nope. Thorium is effectively a magic bullet.
I call it "ensuring that we get our turn to stay in our rut and comfortably screw over those who follow us, while remaining self-righteous because someone else screwed us over first." And yeah, with that kind of mindset, things will definitely get worse before they get better.quash wrote:Call it what you want
The Kerry election's gap was too wide for that to have mattered imo. It wasn't a 2016 thing where doing one good thing would have changed the outcome, and if it wasn't that smear campaign it would have been a different smear campaign. (The ads of Biden touching uncomfortable women and children is going to make the swift boat stuff look like paddycakes, fucking hell fucking heeeeelllll... watching this murder porn happen in slow motion is very uncomfortable...)BulletMagnet wrote:I don't know if such a thing is possible, but I can't help but wonder if anyone has ever attempted to simulate that election's outcome if Swift Boat Veterans for Truth hadn't happened
Supposedly there was supposed to be some US-China cooperation on the topic, but I'm not sure if that includes joint ownership over the IP or if it's mostly hogwash, and the majority of our contribution came from China consulting the old grognards on the original project. I imagine China will effectively own the patent in the end.From what I read, other countries have made greater investments in Thorium research and its applications than we have; if this is indeed such a game-changer, are we as a nation willing to sacrifice anything in exchange for the ability to catch up? Is anyone even looking into the possibility? Has anyone even suggested it?
The only way millennials can screw over anyone right now is the nuclear option: refuse to pay off student debt en masse. Besides that, we're basically grabbed by the ghoulies until the boomers die. Have some light reading on the subject.BulletMagnet wrote:I call it "ensuring that we get our turn to stay in our rut and comfortably screw over those who follow us, while remaining self-righteous because someone else screwed us over first." And yeah, with that kind of mindset, things will definitely get worse before they get better.
https://www.axios.com/joe-biden-cabinet ... cda57.htmlPossible Biden picks:
Jamie Dimon (JPMorgan): Treasury
Anna Finucane (BofA): Treasury
Mike Bloomberg: World Bank
Deval Patrick (Bain Capital): VP
Tom Nides (Morgan Stanley): Commerce
Warren is still figuring out who or whether to endorse a candidate.
For those of you not already convinced I'm a time wizard, Amy has already let it slip that she's Biden's VP. Though I know it's not an impressive prediction because Hillary was their only other option..Mischief Maker wrote:Stop trying to make Klobuchar happen.
It's not gonna happen.BryanM wrote:what should really make you vomit blood is this thought:
they don't need anybody's consent in order to force her upon us. she can be biden's or buttigieg's VP. if they win the general by some miracle, she'll be the next heir in line for the democrats in 2028
this is why thinking is bad
You know full well a government that would remove human death and suffering as a field of profit, would not be one ruled completely by capital.If we ever see nationalized healthcare in this country, enjoy your free veterinarian visits.