Sounds like it's just doing its cult thing.gbaplayer wrote:Phantasm:
Can´t really understand why people think that is a cult classic.

I really like Phantasm, but it's more of a personal favourite than something I'd credit with real excellence like Croneberg's The Fly or Carpenter's The Thing. I like the duality of it... both wordlessly tragic and balls-out brain-drilling macabre. Taken literally it's like some Lovecraftian giallo, merciless to the living and dead alike. Mike crushing the Tall Man's fingers in a door after a frantic chase, to a gush of vile ichor and a bestial wailing from the other side- said digits stored in a box that later reveals only a virulently hideous insect - yeah, cool! Like an 18-certificate Scooby Doo! Also don't be lured by her bountiful rack, Lady in Lavender is gonna stick a knife in your fuckin aorta. Escape is illusory anyway, because whenever and however you die, you won't go heaven - you'll go THEM! *bionic eyebrow*
And as fun as the bogeymen are, its themes of mortality and loss are quietly just as inescapable. Moreso once the movie's switched off. A smartly undersold nightmare via glaring 70s b-horror cheese.
Pretty sure Phantasm II thought better of attempting the same ephemeral trick, which is why the first order of business is to blow up Reggie's house and go full American Horror Road Trip. Some fun to be had for sure, in its more action/horror vein. That line to the hapless priest is a classic (see two paragraphs up!).
Shivers was the dark horse of my earlier-era Cronenberg watching. Seemed relatively benign at first, but yeah nope. Made zombies upsetting again. By the end I wasn't feeling too great at what I'd just witnessed. D: It's good!
