Zen wrote:That you do not understand the concept of European Christianity;
It is not Semitic
I think I'm just gonna sit back and watch this beauty unfold.Also; please stop referring to Jesus as the "Christ".
Zen wrote:That you do not understand the concept of European Christianity;
It is not Semitic
I think I'm just gonna sit back and watch this beauty unfold.Also; please stop referring to Jesus as the "Christ".
mintythecat lecturing Americans from an awfully high pedestal. I know better.Xyga wrote:Wtf are you talking about?
Well, when some of you Americans see fit to call yourselves natives one only has to remind you of the rather short history that your fine nation has.orange808 wrote:mintythecat lecturing Americans from an awfully high pedestal. I know better.Xyga wrote:Wtf are you talking about?
What a pile of absolute, steaming bullshit. I mean, for a start, Germany and indeed a handful of countries are all substantially more regulated (some would say over-regulated) than the USA and guess what, most of the folks who live in those countries are indeed white. So, you could state that white Americans prefer zero regs and no government at the extreme but that doesn't account for the majority of white europeans (the same folks that settled and formed your very nation, Rob) now does it? Which is why, gentleman, that splitting ideological arguments into this race or that race is completely ridiculous and in fact reminds me of the utter tripe that was popular in the 1920s Britain surrounding the Eugenics Movement and the 'racial superioirty studies' carried before that - all completely barmy and utterly, utterly flawed and had substantially more to do with political ideals and racial ones than anything remotely scientific. And yet we live in more enlightened times, right?Rob wrote:[Whites are the only broadly defined group that prefer conservative values and smaller government in America. With bigger government comes more "control and regulation".
Agnostic.Xyga wrote:Jizz Us!
It's incredible, fascinating - and so sad at the same time - how over centuries, millenia, religions have had the capacity to attract and entrance the braindead degenerate nutjobs portion of any society and turn them into phenomenal fanatic pain-in-the-asses who will always and without a rest strive to drag humanity down to the deepest, obscure levels of superdense stupidity it's able to reach before turning full vegetable-level drooling retard.
And they have the internet now. Why Jizz Us? WHY?
PS: not disappointed though this IS entertaining. *popcorn.gif*
-"You are in fact our cousins but you are certainly not natives to the US."Well, when some of you Americans see fit to call yourselves natives
This is how attempted communication with Minty goes.What a pile of absolute, steaming bullshit. I mean, for a start, Germany...
Being gay isn't a lifestyle choice like deciding what clothes to wear, unless you're ignorant to basically everything we know of biology:BulletMagnet wrote: And the Bible's not exactly ambiguous when it comes to homosexuality; so even if we aren't going full Wahhabi on them (though some Christians think we should), why should we "accept" their lifestyle in any notable capacity, as doing so obviously further corrodes the already-imperiled moral and social bedrock upon which all of "the West" was founded?
one for shitposting apparentlySkykid wrote:What thread is this again?
Cultures are not static entities. Constitutions and societal values change, and the people who live in those societies change their values. This is not a bad thing. What, do you think America should live by the values of its founders and readopt widespread slavery? This whole "bawww other people are scary" nonsense is ridiculous.I will say that again; Western culture is European and Christian.
What does all this mean? It means that unless you are both a citizen and more importantly, live by the values of its founders, you are not an American.
In my country, we have 2nd generation African-Muslims who are Irish citizens. Are they Irish? No. And never will they be. Being Irish is not a matter of legality. Nor is it "relative", "fluid" or up for discussion.
Cultural and indeed "racial" relativism is a myth. If this reality is too heavy for you, try starting here, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Little_Red_HenBareKnuckleRoo wrote:There seems to be a strong cultural inclination in parts of the world against becoming a "melting-pot" style society with a diverse mix of cultural backgrounds, as if that's somehow an inherent detriment.
We have a big Mennonite and Jewish terrorist problem, do we?BareKnuckleRoo wrote: Islam is no more extreme/insular than ultra orthodox sects of Judaism or perhaps Mennonites.
As a Misotheist, you are basically no different from a Theist. Its still all about God/Gods.BareKnuckleRoo wrote:As a misotheist
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
Xyga, you absolute madman!Xyga wrote:@Roo; you still think it is possible to talk sense into those two bastards? They are deep in a mad paranoid trip where they see their imaginary monolithic 'white, christian by nature , european western culture' under siege! no, already invaded! by means of a conspiracy! to pollute and undermine their pure superior race and culture with dirty, immoral, weak, lazy and unintelligent (the passmark IQ benchmark says it all) virus-like agents like blacks, arabs, jews, liberals and of course lgbt too (all marxist things).
We're 100% in the far-right narrative, specifically radical christian here who tie race religion and nation together in a most hillarious demonstration of crass ignoance as usual. No less crazy than wahabbites or orthodox jews, in my country when these peaceful so-far-right-they-crash-into-walls christians see black people they make monkey noises and have their children throw banana peels at them, and gays just get beaten up, because they're 'immoral, aberrations, sick, evil/anti-christian'.
But unlike you I don't think all religious people are like that, some of the most humane and rspectful people I've met were christian, jew, and muslim alike it didn't matter. Not being an ultra-narrow-minded hateful bigot fucked up bastard is an individual choice everyone is free to make, and nobody's born with a religion, free nations have long left the obsolete rules of religion behind and embraced more enlightened forms of society like the republic, democracy, equal rights and of course and indeed secularism.
Even when they don't function well anymore and we need to fix and improve them, they're still basis for society worth a million times more than those nutjob's insane stupid desire to plunge our world back into a kind of new dark ages of submission to mysticism, lords, and violence as the new standards, just like ISIS but white and christian.
But to the question "What thread is this again?"
Its the usual purpose of give our far-right ideologue super stars a stage to do what they do best;
"The same thing we do in every other thread like the Trump one, Pinky; spam our propaganda ever day to weed-out liberals and recruit more worthy white soldiers to fight and win the Racial Holy War!"
What is it specifically about Agnostic, that you do not understand?Xyga wrote: specifically radical christian here
Again with the racist language. I am starting to notice a pattern here.Xyga wrote: in my country when these peaceful so-far-right-they-crash-into-walls christians see black people they make monkey noises and have their children throw banana peels at them, and gays just get beaten up, because they're 'immoral, aberrations, sick, evil/anti-christian'.
Whoa there, fella. That's some hubris you are showing there. Its almost bordering on being . . . racistXyga wrote:Even when they don't function well anymore and we need to fix and improve them,
Yeah. "Basically Isis"Xyga wrote:just like ISIS but white and christian.
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
Do you even know how to read? It's a children's aesop-style fable about work ethic, where the heck are you getting racial overtones? Per wikipedia:The story is applied in teaching children the virtues of work ethic and personal initiative.Zen wrote:If this reality is too heavy for you, try starting here
Now apply that to the number of deaths in the USA by right wing terrorists and from both careless gun owners as well as those who go on rampages.We have a big Mennonite and Jewish terrorist problem, do we?
lol are you just trolling for responses or something?As a Misotheist, you are basically no different from a Theist.
Best check your chronic apophenia.Xyga wrote:No agnostic could have posted the imbecile white christian west load you've posted. Or what, you're just relaying the propaganda to appeal to them? yes very much possible I give you that.
As for the racism, your post's and rob's are full of it, if you're too mad and retarded to even comprehend your own words, it's a miracle you're still able to breathe.
Keep posting 'we are not racists', that's very funny.
Pattern? you can't see shit you absolute blind mad man!
EDIT: I'm waiting for the absolute ridiculous batshit insane explanation by which one comes to say that supporting the republic, democracy, equal rights, secularism etc equates to being racist.
But wait I know it actually, it's a statist-marxist plot to undermine the white race, OF COURSE !!!!!!!!!!!!!
So now you are adding "dog whistler" to your list of accusations?Xyga wrote: Or what, you're just relaying the propaganda to appeal to them? yes very much possible I give you that.
BareKnuckleRoo wrote:Do you even know how to read? It's a children's aesop-style fable about work ethic, where the heck are you getting racial overtones? Per wikipedia:The story is applied in teaching children the virtues of work ethic and personal initiative.Zen wrote:If this reality is too heavy for you, try starting here
Now apply that to the number of deaths in the USA by right wing terrorists and from both careless gun owners as well as those who go on rampages.We have a big Mennonite and Jewish terrorist problem, do we?
Islam's shitty, but it's propped up as evil and scary by Republicans to score political points, when there are far more pressing evils that claim lives regularly.
In the middle east, there's a lot of Islam vs Islam terrorist infighting, but culturally that's an issue that external forces won't be able to control; it'll only go away if there's a cultural shift within the populace that develops naturally (hence the USA's constant interference doing fuck-all to stop it).
lol are you just trolling for responses or something?As a Misotheist, you are basically no different from a Theist.
For the record, I don't hate religious people or think they're all stupid, terribly behaved, etc; individually, most people have no control over what religion they are as they're born into it culturally. I hate religion and deities as concepts because of the repression and removal of free will they represent, and want to see humanity freed from religions as a concept. At best, they're silly, harmless beliefs that are only paid casual attention (your average Christian in the USA believes in God so long as it's convenient, and for the most part doesn't know or care to think much about the Bible in terms of the laws in actually dictates). At worst, they're used as harsh tools of control and repression within society, and fundamentally hold humanity back from potential progress (creationism and anti-birth control obsessions in the USA, repression of women and punishment for apostasy in the Middle East).Xyga wrote:But unlike you I don't think all religious people are like that, some of the most humane and rspectful people I've met were christian, jew, and muslim alike it didn't matter.
i seriously think your time would be spent more productively playing shmups than posting in off-topicSearch for Author: Zen in High Scores -
No suitable matches were found.
Well it's no surprise a far-right troll like you relying on 'psychology for dummies' level of yawny bullshit would stand firm in denial of everything. That's basic slimy politics rhetorical control. Ok so;Zen wrote:Best check your chronic apophenia.Xyga wrote:No agnostic could have posted the imbecile white christian west load you've posted. Or what, you're just relaying the propaganda to appeal to them? yes very much possible I give you that.
As for the racism, your post's and rob's are full of it, if you're too mad and retarded to even comprehend your own words, it's a miracle you're still able to breathe.
Keep posting 'we are not racists', that's very funny.
Pattern? you can't see shit you absolute blind mad man!
EDIT: I'm waiting for the absolute ridiculous batshit insane explanation by which one comes to say that supporting the republic, democracy, equal rights, secularism etc equates to being racist.
But wait I know it actually, it's a statist-marxist plot to undermine the white race, OF COURSE !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Your posts are a master class in cognitive dissonance.
Lets see now. So far I am a;
Nazi
Radical White Christian
Racist
Not forgetting your latest insanity;So now you are adding "dog whistler" to your list of accusations?Xyga wrote: Or what, you're just relaying the propaganda to appeal to them? yes very much possible I give you that.
You give me pause, sir. I do not wish to agitate you.
Are you "well", sir?
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
BareKnuckleRoo wrote:The best way to integrate surely is to be welcoming and reasonably accommodating rather than being xenophobic and essentially saying "you'll never be one of us".
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/deradic ... -1.4414999Canada is concerned about the national security threat posed by citizens who joined the Islamic State group, returning to this country, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Monday.
In parliament, Trudeau pledged to prosecute those who broke Canada’s anti-terrorism laws by joining the ISIS group, but also said his government would try to reintegrate them into society.“We recognize the return of even one individual (who joined the ISIS group) may have serious national security implications,” Trudeau said.
“We are going to monitor them. We are also there to help them to let go of that terrorist ideology,” he added.
Canada's simply trying to take the high road with the hopes that it'll be better in the long road for the middle east situation than potentially inflaming things by basically sending them all to the gallows (we also don't know the situations of all of them, what age they were, if family forced them, etc). It's also legally troubling when a country casually discusses mass execution of its citizens as a first resort.“I’m afraid we have to be serious about the fact these people are a serious danger to us, and unfortunately the only way of dealing with them will be, in almost every case, to kill them,” the UK’s minister of international development Rory Stewart told BBC Radio last month.
That was echoed in Syria last month by Brett McGurk, US President Trump’s special envoy in the fight against ISIS.
“Our mission is to make sure that any foreign fighter who is here, who joined ISIS from a foreign country and came into Syria, that they will die here in Syria,” said McGurk, who was appointed to the post under Obama.
Australia and France are also attempting to kill citizens fighting with ISIS overseas, rather than have them return home.
But Canada “does not engage in death squads,” Goodale told CBC’s Power and Politics Friday.
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
It is hugely, HUGELY problematic to seriously argue that countries should casually participate in extrajudicial execution of its citizens for alleged crimes. Legally and ethically there are vast issues with the suggestion that this should be OK and normal; this should be obvious and I'm not going to get into this or entertain any suggestions that countries like Canada are in the wrong for not participating in these atrocities.Xyga wrote:Regarding the latter seriously who cares if they're killed by a death squad or on the battlefield? This is war, and these people, the returnees, really are extrememly dangerous.
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"
Strikers1945guy wrote:"Do we....eat chicken balls?!"