Prelude to the Apocalypse

[jonny5]

It's all well and good to espouse hate and throw around words like cuck from the safety of your keyboard, but talking that shit in real life has consequences. My point was Rob is not stupid, he knows what he is saying, and he knows I am right. He would NOT say that to my face, unless he WANTED a fight. The same way he wouldn't walk up to a black person and start telling them about how people like them are destroying his 'white country'. Those are not words you use to start a conversation. Those are words you use to start a fight.

I understand the point that you were making. All I offered was the suggestion of impulse control. Without it, their is only chaos.
Words, any words, said to "my face", never have and never will result in violence. This is a very basic skill that we all learn as children, yes?

I am suggesting to you that analysing any disproportionate response to what are after all, words, will be far more informative to oneself that allowing impulse to win over and then wasting ones mental processes on justifying the loss of control.

I'm tolerant of many things, but people who promote hate and division have no place in modern society.

If you see them as having no place in modern society, what do you see as the solution? What one may perceive as "hate and division" will be subjective and may differ wildly for one person to the next. What exactly would be the antidote to what one perceives as "hate and division". Protest? "Punch a Nazi"? Where does it end?

The solution is unity. The sooner we all get over our differences and come together as people, the better. As long as we have more people who believe that, we have a chance. Otherwise we're all lost.

[Zen]

The solution is unity. The sooner we all get over our differences and come together as people, the better. As long as we have more people who believe that, we have a chance. Otherwise we're all lost.

Indeed.
Would you agree that, in the pursuit of said unity, the use violence can have no place?

[Durandal]

Now, I would kindly ask you to do me the respect of not throwing around terms like 'cuck' at me. This is a very offensive thing to call someone,

I see. Do you think calling people "white supremacist" is offensive or potentially damaging? I do not believe one bit in white supremacy. I have encountered more than enough cretinous whites to have any illusions about white supremacy, and I don't believe whites should rule over people who would prefer to be governed or policed by more sympathetic members of their own group. I don't believe whites should exploit people from other nations, meddle in their politics or affairs in general. If people want to chop off hands, marry family members or engage in canniblism, that is fine for them over there.

However, I wish the same for myself and my country. Any non-white who chooses to live in a nation founded by whites should be there because they want to be in a white nation and have the capacity to harmonize with the native whites, and it would be much easier to welcome them. Our cultures and institutions can not be maintained by people who hate us and our ancestors, hate free speech, hate our laws, etc.

Saying you aren't a white supremacist isn't particularly convincing when you proceed to list reasons predicated on cultural stereotypes as to why (?these) non-white people shouldn't be allowed to immigrate to the USA. Is the message I'm supposed to take from this that whites suck, but non-whites suck even worse?

I'm not convinced at all that blocking the human intake is going to do much to preserve (?American culture) when this culture you speak of is largely dictated by corporate trendsetters and the newest doodads on the market. The stern Christian Americans of olde got slowly swept under the rug as consumerism took hold over the American youth with its fashion, gadgets and entertainment which promote individuality on one hand by subtly suggesting you should buy all this brand stuff so you can be unique and stand out from the current cultural norms, while at the same time promoting conformity by spawning a whole heap of these rebelling individualists who merge together into a big profitable fad. Hippies, punks, goths, grungers, metalheads, whatever, eventually they're all going to get commercialized and ran into the ground.

Give Muslim immigrants some time, and even the Islamic culture you fear so much will have dissolved into the melting pot beyond recognition as the offspring of the first generation is gleefully fidgeting with fidget spinners, competing for attention on Instagram, and parroting opinions from TV hosts. Of course, the ones who don't have the finances to participate in this bullshit are more likely to get ostracized like the kid in school whose parents won't let him buy Minecraft or Call of Duty. The reason you see so much contempt for the state and institutions in lower class neighborhoods is because they do not have the finances to participate in the latest bullshit and in turn only have others in similar financial situations to form a community with, who together in turn blame the state for things like ridiculous college tuition fees, institutional racism, and so on. Coincidentally, children of Muslim immigrants who stick to their family more closely as a result of a poor financial situation are more likely to perpetuate traditional Islamic values. Who knew that the economic situation can influence the cultural situation.

Too many people are coming here and too many of them for monetary reasons alone. A desire to make and consume more will never be the glue that keeps a country together.

Too many people are coming here and too many of them for monetary reasons alone. A desire to make and consume more will never be the glue that keeps a country together.

Too many people are coming here and too many of them for monetary reasons alone. A desire to make and consume more will never be the glue that keeps a country together.

I've quoted this thrice in the hope that you'll re-read that statement thoroughly and realize the absolute irony of it, because that drive to turn over a new leaf and make a living for yourself regardless of class is the very foundation of the American Dream, and what has drawn so many people to the USA to begin with. Shit, what is the Californian Gold Rush? The way you phrase it makes it seem like you only consider it a problem which started recently when it had been the case since the founding years. In recent decades the drive to consume has been appended to the dream, to make and consume more is as American as it gets, and the misconception that there is something worth actively preserving culturally to the point where immigration control should be prioritized over economic stability, is a bit of a headscratcher. I'm sure people would have less to complain about and less reason to become religious if they are already well off materially.

You see a country filled with people who consume more than they create like pigs, and then you see outsiders who wish to start a new life in that country. But then you tell them they can't come in, because you don't want to risk the possibility of them turning into those pigs as well, and because you don't want them to throw their perceived barbaric cultural practices on top of the tire fire which reads AMERICAN CULTURE. It makes sense to not add more to the fire, but you'd think that the cause of the fire is more deserving of attention. No matter how you look at it, that's chasing symptoms. Ask yourself, what is the cause behind the ills of America and am I prioritizing it?

Whatever white-centric culture there used to be died out some time ago at the hands of the whites themselves, and with the current racial composition of America where a significant portion of American citizens are non-white and another significant portion of whites do not wish to preserve a white-centric culture, the notion that America is a white nation rooted in European culture can only be correctly construed in either the past tense or the future tense combined with severe ethnic cleansing. There is no realistic hope to rebirth your idea of the ideal American culture to anyone but yourself and your immediate surroundings. At this point, efforts are better spent on rekindling the economic situation of olde instead of only the cultural situation.

[Rob]

your ideas are of incredible violence and we are forced to endure your disgusting provocations,

Cute stuff from the "nuke 'em from orbit" guy. I do not promote violence of any kind. In fact, a safer country is what I desire. I think this can be accomplished by telling people from cultures more violent than ours that they can't come in, which is very extreme, disgusting, nauseating and horrifying - to a liberal.

but people who promote hate and division have no place in modern society.

We need beatdowns to promote peace and unity. I've already learned about that one from Youtube.

[jepjepjep]

Not everyone who disagrees with racist or xenophobic idealogies is a liberal. You're painting in a very wide brush.

I'm sorry but if you hold racist beliefs, then you're a racist even though you don't like being called one.

a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another.

You've posted that genetic superiority BS in this thread. If that's a belief that you hold that somehow the "white" "European" race is superior than others, then congratulations, you are a racist.

[jepjepjep]

Getting back to immigration, where do you draw the lines for acceptable races/cultures? Are white people from non-European cultures cool with you? Takes Mexicans for example, there are quite a few white Mexicans that came from Europe. Are they cool?

Is it just a xenophobia thing, like the Japanese, where you want to limit all "outsiders"? That is still racist, but the fact that you have posted all this white European culture superiority stuff gives the impression that being "white" is an important aspect of acceptance.

[Giest118]

The sort of immigration that doesn't turn a country into the rape capital of Europe.

I dunno.

Maybe rape is good.

Is rape good?

[jepjepjep]

I'm not that familiar with European politics, Geist? What country are you referring to?

The first google hit I found was this BBC article about Malmo (http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-39056786) which comes to the conclusion that "The rate of reported rapes in Malmo has not dramatically risen in recent years and has in fact declined from its peak in 2010, before the recent large increases in refugees."

Are "white looking" Syrians cool too, or nah? Where do you draw the lines for acceptable immigrants?

[Xyga]

Not everyone who disagrees with racist or xenophobic idealogies is a liberal. You're painting in a very wide brush.

Yeah but in their world that's impossible, translation in their alt-right logic;

against racism = liberal
would love to nuke nazis, commies, religious fanatic terrorist = liberal
liberal = SJW
liberal = antifa
right (by euro standards) = liberals
center-right = liberal commies
artists = liberal
non-christian = islamic liberal or jew liberal
democracy = liberal
equal rights = liberal
bearded = islamic or jew liberal
gangsta = liberal
your dog = liberal
fidget spinners = liberal
etc
all = cucks, or pro-rape willingly offering innocent white virgins to mud apes (never forget the sexual competition, it's core racist nightmare thinking)

whites = none of the above, superior intellect even the trailer trash, wise, never criminals, never comitted any in history, the blond ones descend from elves chosen by God (actually Odin in disguise), invented everything, listen only to Wagner or NSBM, admitted pedophiles but that's okay.

Nevah forget, if there's one category of people racists probably hate even more than the mud people, it's other whites...who actually still massively disagree with them and reject their toxic ideas.

[Giest118]

The projection is strong with this one.

[BryanM]

Puerto Rico. More debt peonage for "help" with the current crisis.

If it were a full-on state, I wonder if anything would be remotely different. I doubt it.

[Bananamatic]

fidget spinners = liberal

wrong

[Mischief Maker]

Nice cartoon of imaginary white genocide.

Here's the reality caught on video.

[Rob]

Mike Cernovich is a pitiful dude - no argument there. More this kind of thing: Trump supporter smashed in the head with U-Lock by masked Antifa Thug in Berkeley.

[Giest118]

Oh, Rob. That doesn't count. Violence is only bad when right-wingers do it.

[Xyga]

Yes yes yes...and everyone opposing racists is a mean leftist oppressor and aggressor, greatest example in history being the Allied Antifa powers mercilessly crushing the poor Innocent Axis. What a bunch of violent thugs.

I love when people who embrace racist ideas call themselves harmless and innocent, and those who oppose them 'violent'.

Hillarious because there's no peaceful nor acceptable racism. It's one of the most fundamental and complete insults for all of humanity, it expresses contempt, disdain for one of the very things no one choses nor can do anything about, it's natural and part of oneself and masses of other people, and you insult that very nature.
It's creating an immediate and unpardonable two-way animosity, insult someone for his race and you're guaranteed to become enemies even making your target develop similar racist feelings against you.
I mean there's many kinds of insults, you could tell someone his mom's a slut and who knows, maybe it's true or the person will hate his mother and not care?
But the racial insult is unescapable, comprises massses of people at once, and the damage it does only difficultly heals over time, it's mainly after the offender and offended have passed away that people might get over it, but painful traces remain for long.
Combine with furious nationalism exacerbating xenophobia and religious fanaticism and you have the most explosive cocktail of extreme prejudice-fueled ideology. Sure is peaceful! The kind of peaceful thinking only equaled by communist and jihadist madness.

Of course racists will deny everything and return every accusation to their detractors, why wouldn't they? When you hold beliefs that are largely seens as unacceptable, when you spread them, until the day your camp seizes power you can't be completely honest publicly, even behind the safety of internet anonimity you have to play the 'normal' act as much as possible with all the rhetorical logic twisting and stretching tools and propaganda at your disposal, never show your true face and play the victim, show yourself as educated and polite as possible: in front of someone you've angered it'll make you seem like the more civilized one. Rhetoric magic ftw!
In any case racists never, ever reveal their whole thoughts and real goals on the core topic, if you want to know what they really want it's necessary to gain their trust so they'd open themselves to you and say it.
I've tried that several times in my life, and lately it's been easier than ever since with all the racist noise and overall favourable polls they're becoming more and more confident, and when they finally do speak you better have good self-control to not run from the horror or beat the shit out of them.

Never once have I had an open conversation with a racist who's not really wanting mass deportation and murder, never once.
It makes sense as racism is violent no matter how much they try to twist anyone's perception of reality. There's no way racism's got any place in society, and whatever society built around it would only be a parody of it. Atrocities and conflict are guaranteed to happen, if the parody of society doesn't collapse by itself being based over ridiculous assumptions of superiority and fantasy utopian bullshit.
Anyone who doesn't see any problems with racism and would see it as a viable component of human organization to live on this planet is either really dumb and immature, or impaired by psychological and educational issues, as it's fundamentally antisocial and sociopathic. I think it's a mix of both.

Immaturity is an especially strong reason behind racist thinking and bigottery in general imho, it's incredible how obvious it is; that hate for change, difference and fear of the outsider, idealizing a sort of safe comfortable 'heimat' like always be protected by the mommy-home-country where no one you dislike or contradicts you will be around ever.
Most important is the sexual frustration perspiring, with the very strong focus on racial purity and fear of 'their' women being raped by hairy savages (or deep inside the frustration of imagining other, more virile men would get the women they can't have?)
The insecurity and also more subtetly solitude is palpable, that insistance on oversimplifying massive groups of people by reducing them to races and religions or political sides as they would be solid, shades-less, consitent masses of robots incapable of individuality, is explained imho by the racist's own insecurity.
To avoid seeing the overwhelming complexity of humanity's diversity they forcibly group everyone in extremely simple blocks and they don't want to hear any 'no thats wrong', because to them it's reassuring.
Seeing the world as a terrain with only monolithic colored and loosely named competiting tribes, like each one's an army a la Risk, completely discharges to actually think about them.
All doubt is gone, there's the good guys (dem elves) and the bad guys (orcs), no need to deal with having a closer look or listen, they're different because they look so, and that reality comes before each one of them being a person. they're all the same period. Let's drop something hypocrite like 'some of them must be good' here and there like that will erase the fact that their whole group has been insulted, but the racist in public always needs something to 'clear' himself from the racist accusation in a totally believeable fashion. It's the "how dare you call me a racist I have a black/muslim/jew/asian/etc friend and I love their cuisine" kinda bullshit.

But nope the world is as the racist says;
There's no way whites aren't genetically superior because their countries are the 'best' period, wealth is proof andd they did eevrything by themselves, they're the 'western civilization' no questioning how ridiculously meaningless that term is, the randian Atlas with a racial twist is good.
Mexicans are criminals and opportunists because it's in their culture.
Islam is a religion of war and terrorism and they're all like that no question and there's absolutely no consequences in constantly openly assimilating the nearly 2 billion of them to terrorists and drag them in the mud.
Blacks are lesser human beings because they're poorer and live in more violent environments because it's their nature, no way it could be that masses of them are in such situation because they're still held to strongly by a misery that a still very racial perception of the other races towards them participates to.
etc, humanity explained exclusively by prejudice and denial of individuality.

thay're all egoist perceptions of humanity and its people coming from unexperienced self-centered minds unable to cope with the concept of 'stranger' or 'different' and the challenge to have to deal with those, the only world they will accept has to be a simple fantasy land, where beyond individuality and circumstances everything is determined by your race and/or your religion and alliegance to power, class, etc, it's a novel, comic or a game where everything is already written and immuable and can only go one way or move only within very restrictive limits. No suprises, no troubling uncertainties; the absolute safe space for a teenage mind, a man-child.

It's especially funny to hear them constantly return all criticism of what they themselves are, people who disagree with their racism are 'intolerant', freedom-haters' even though they're the ones abusing the very definition of freedom. Basically everything racists strive to achieve they blame on others. Of course they're aware it's wrong, it's all on purpose, I don't take racists for complete idiots, I take them for what they really are: narcissitic, perverse assholes with ill intent.
The pinaccle of this behaviour being the 'self-loathing' accusation, since it is the one thing so strongly at the root of their racism.
You understand their thirst for SJW and 'cringe' material because the idiots on the left no matter where they stand are a godsend, they're precious material needed to cancel out criticism by disruption, though even using SJW as rhetorical shields to divert attention, the fact remains that a racist asshole is still a racist asshole promoter of ideas at the top of the most violent and destructive.
Pushing people who at some point created movements for legitimate reasons to cross the line is also important, when you're a racist militant you absolutely need other people than you to go overboard and make claims that are anti-social, ultimately cancelling the legitimacy of their criticism against you own ideas. that's the whole point of 'triggering'. That's very clever as it won't be just racists that will come to reject SJW, very perverse and efficient strategy.

But nah, whatever, they're right it all makes sense, don't worry, when every people on Erath will become contemptuous racist xenophobes, humanity will have achieved true peace. The weak'll and unfit will always be wrong and discarded, eliminated like viruses and harmful bacteria, nobody will oppose the cleaning job.

Racism is peace, racims is love, racism is good. Amen.

...but hey, funny that its ultimate goal sounds so commie, right?

EDIT PS: oh and in anticipation of the inevitable twisting of my purpose, of course it's not an attack against whites exclusively, although I had mostly the situation in the US in mind because they're at the epicenter of the resurgence of racist ideologies, it goes without saying that racism exists almost everywhere and grows almost exponentially along with economical, social and political unrest. Misery makes people scared and angry, and a number become stupidier -> unevitably pushing racism forward.

[BulletMagnet]

Violence is only bad when right-wingers do it.

One doesn't even need to go as far as violent rhetoric to be labeled "intolerant" towards nativists (though most seem to skip right past that and go straight to advocating white genocide ), but not being openly willing to enact "any action necessary to defend our culture" when it comes to immigrants (because obviously every single institution that might otherwise handle such matters is in on the white genocide and can't be trusted) makes you a cuck.

[Zen]

Yes yes yes...and everyone opposing racists is a mean leftist oppressor and aggressor, greatest example in history being the Allied Antifa powers mercilessly crushing the poor Innocent Axis. What a bunch of violent thugs.

I love when people who embrace racist ideas call themselves harmless and innocent, and those who oppose them 'violent'.

Hillarious because there's no peaceful nor acceptable racism. It's one of the most fundamental and complete insults for all of humanity, it expresses contempt, disdain for one of the very things no one choses nor can do anything about, it's natural and part of oneself and masses of other people, and you insult that very nature.
It's creating an immediate and unpardonable two-way animosity, insult someone for his race and you're guaranteed to become enemies even making your target develop similar racist feelings against you.
I mean there's many kinds of insults, you could tell someone his mom's a slut and who knows, maybe it's true or the person will hate his mother and not care?
But the racial insult is unescapable, comprises massses of people at once, and the damage it does only difficultly heals over time, it's mainly after the offender and offended have passed away that people might get over it, but painful traces remain for long.
Combine with furious nationalism exacerbating xenophobia and religious fanaticism and you have the most explosive cocktail of extreme prejudice-fueled ideology. Sure is peaceful! The kind of peaceful thinking only equaled by communist and jihadist madness.

Of course racists will deny everything and return every accusation to their detractors, why wouldn't they? When you hold beliefs that are largely seens as unacceptable, when you spread them, until the day your camp seizes power you can't be completely honest publicly, even behind the safety of internet anonimity you have to play the 'normal' act as much as possible with all the rhetorical logic twisting and stretching tools and propaganda at your disposal, never show your true face and play the victim, show yourself as educated and polite as possible: in front of someone you've angered it'll make you seem like the more civilized one. Rhetoric magic ftw!
In any case racists never, ever reveal their whole thoughts and real goals on the core topic, if you want to know what they really want it's necessary to gain their trust so they'd open themselves to you and say it.
I've tried that several times in my life, and lately it's been easier than ever since with all the racist noise and overall favourable polls they're becoming more and more confident, and when they finally do speak you better have good self-control to not run from the horror or beat the shit out of them.

Never once have I had an open conversation with a racist who's not really wanting mass deportation and murder, never once.
It makes sense as racism is violent no matter how much they try to twist anyone's perception of reality. There's no way racism's got any place in society, and whatever society built around it would only be a parody of it. Atrocities and conflict are guaranteed to happen, if the parody of society doesn't collapse by itself being based over ridiculous assumptions of superiority and fantasy utopian bullshit.
Anyone who doesn't see any problems with racism and would see it as a viable component of human organization to live on this planet is either really dumb and immature, or impaired by psychological and educational issues, as it's fundamentally antisocial and sociopathic. I think it's a mix of both.

Immaturity is an especially strong reason behind racist thinking and bigottery in general imho, it's incredible how obvious it is; that hate for change, difference and fear of the outsider, idealizing a sort of safe comfortable 'heimat' like always be protected by the mommy-home-country where no one you dislike or contradicts you will be around ever.
Most important is the sexual frustration perspiring, with the very strong focus on racial purity and fear of 'their' women being raped by hairy savages (or deep inside the frustration of imagining other, more virile men would get the women they can't have?)
The insecurity and also more subtetly solitude is palpable, that insistance on oversimplifying massive groups of people by reducing them to races and religions or political sides as they would be solid, shades-less, consitent masses of robots incapable of individuality, is explained imho by the racist's own insecurity.
To avoid seeing the overwhelming complexity of humanity's diversity they forcibly group everyone in extremely simple blocks and they don't want to hear any 'no thats wrong', because to them it's reassuring.
Seeing the world as a terrain with only monolithic colored and loosely named competiting tribes, like each one's an army a la Risk, completely discharges to actually think about them.
All doubt is gone, there's the good guys (dem elves) and the bad guys (orcs), no need to deal with having a closer look or listen, they're different because they look so, and that reality comes before each one of them being a person. they're all the same period. Let's drop something hypocrite like 'some of them must be good' here and there like that will erase the fact that their whole group has been insulted, but the racist in public always needs something to 'clear' himself from the racist accusation in a totally believeable fashion. It's the "how dare you call me a racist I have a black/muslim/jew/asian/etc friend and I love their cuisine" kinda bullshit.

But nope the world is as the racist says;
There's no way whites aren't genetically superior because their countries are the 'best' period, wealth is proof andd they did eevrything by themselves, they're the 'western civilization' no questioning how ridiculously meaningless that term is, the randian Atlas with a racial twist is good.
Mexicans are criminals and opportunists because it's in their culture.
Islam is a religion of war and terrorism and they're all like that no question and there's absolutely no consequences in constantly openly assimilating the nearly 2 billion of them to terrorists and drag them in the mud.
Blacks are lesser human beings because they're poorer and live in more violent environments because it's their nature, no way it could be that masses of them are in such situation because they're still held to strongly by a misery that a still very racial perception of the other races towards them participates to.
etc, humanity explained exclusively by prejudice and denial of individuality.

thay're all egoist perceptions of humanity and its people coming from unexperienced self-centered minds unable to cope with the concept of 'stranger' or 'different' and the challenge to have to deal with those, the only world they will accept has to be a simple fantasy land, where beyond individuality and circumstances everything is determined by your race and/or your religion and alliegance to power, class, etc, it's a novel, comic or a game where everything is already written and immuable and can only go one way or move only within very restrictive limits. No suprises, no troubling uncertainties; the absolute safe space for a teenage mind, a man-child.

It's especially funny to hear them constantly return all criticism of what they themselves are, people who disagree with their racism are 'intolerant', freedom-haters' even though they're the ones abusing the very definition of freedom. Basically everything racists strive to achieve they blame on others. Of course they're aware it's wrong, it's all on purpose, I don't take racists for complete idiots, I take them for what they really are: narcissitic, perverse assholes with ill intent.
The pinaccle of this behaviour being the 'self-loathing' accusation, since it is the one thing so strongly at the root of their racism.
You understand their thirst for SJW and 'cringe' material because the idiots on the left no matter where they stand are a godsend, they're precious material needed to cancel out criticism by disruption, though even using SJW as rhetorical shields to divert attention, the fact remains that a racist asshole is still a racist asshole promoter of ideas at the top of the most violent and destructive.
Pushing people who at some point created movements for legitimate reasons to cross the line is also important, when you're a racist militant you absolutely need other people than you to go overboard and make claims that are anti-social, ultimately cancelling the legitimacy of their criticism against you own ideas. that's the whole point of 'triggering'. That's very clever as it won't be just racists that will come to reject SJW, very perverse and efficient strategy.

But nah, whatever, they're right it all makes sense, don't worry, when every people on Erath will become contemptuous racist xenophobes, humanity will have achieved true peace. The weak'll and unfit will always be wrong and discarded, eliminated like viruses and harmful bacteria, nobody will oppose the cleaning job.

Racism is peace, racims is love, racism is good. Amen.

...but hey, funny that its ultimate goal sounds so commie, right?

EDIT PS: oh and in anticipation of the inevitable twisting of my purpose, of course it's not an attack against whites exclusively, although I had mostly the situation in the US in mind because they're at the epicenter of the resurgence of racist ideologies, it goes without saying that racism exists almost everywhere and grows almost exponentially along with economical, social and political unrest. Misery makes people scared and angry, and a number become stupidier -> unevitably pushing racism forward.

Your continued justifications for the use of actual physical violence against people who use words or hold ideas that you personally disagree with, paints a pretty clear picture at this stage.
It is, frankly, concerning.

[Rob]

Oh, Rob. That doesn't count. Violence is only bad when right-wingers do it.

Even more disturbing than the unprovoked attack was the fact that the perpetrator was a professor. A possible hint about why young Americans are often the way they are. Rabid and vengeful people like that putting ideas in their heads - then add the media, making them feel like they're self-righteously battling actual fascists.

[Bananamatic]

wake up, check news
Edmonton terror attack: Chaos in Canada as cops stabbed by man with ISIS flag and pedestrians ploughed into during terror attack
Man shot dead by French army after killing two people at Marseille train station
part and parcel I guess, at least I'm not racist

[Xyga]

Your continued justifications for the use of actual physical violence against people who use words or hold ideas that you personally disagree with, paints a pretty clear picture at this stage.
It is, frankly, concerning.

Your words and ideas call for the epitome of violence you miserable hypocrites, and you know it, law and justice first to stop you, then yes if necessary we'll have to use violence to defend our freedom and that of all the people you see as inferior beings, we'll fight your criminal ideology.
You're no better than those mad jihadi nuts monsters or NK psychommunism.
The longer we wait to fight you the closer we come to re-live the same horrors of the past.

[Zen]

Your continued justifications for the use of actual physical violence against people who use words or hold ideas that you personally disagree with, paints a pretty clear picture at this stage.
It is, frankly, concerning.

Your words and ideas call for the epitome of violence you miserable hypocrites, and you know it, law and justice first to stop you, then yes if necessary we'll have to use violence to defend our freedom and that of all the people you see as inferior beings, we'll fight your criminal ideology.
You're no better than those mad jihadi nuts monsters or NK psychommunism.
The longer we wait to fight you the closer we come to re-live the same horrors of the past.

Your ability to differentiate between subjective and objective reality, seems to be flimsy at best.

law and justice first to stop you, then yes if necessary we'll have to use violence to defend our freedom

Indeed.
The use of violence, other than in defending oneself from imminent physical harm, would be illegal, you realise?
I can assure you, that a legal defence explaining that you instigated physical violence against another person based on your subjective fantasy that their " ideas are of incredible violence", will not only get you time but more likely end with involuntary commitment.

The longer we wait to fight you the closer we come to re-live the same horrors of the past.

Demented.

[Xyga]

You guys want racial cleansing, and there's no doing that without using absolute violence the same way the most brutal and murderous dictatures like the nazi's did, you're just hypocrites snakes at a cosmic level who will never admit it when what you want is pretty damn clear.
Fighting anyone, any group who desires that and will unevitably come to realize it when they come to power is perfectly just, justified and will always be. Fuck you.

[Giest118]

DON'T CALL US VIOLENT YOU NAZI FAGGOTS ALSO WE NEED VIOLENCE TO CREATE A FINAL SOLUTION AND CLEANSE YOU FUCKERS FROM EXISTENCE

I'm sure Hitler and the other Nazis didn't use your rhetoric at all.

[Xyga]

You know you posts are so dumb I really dont care, but well, okay bud go on.

[Zen]

You guys want racial cleansing, and there's no doing that without using absolute violence the same way the most brutal and murderous dictatures like the nazi's did, you're just hypocrites snakes at a cosmic level who will never admit it when what you want is pretty damn clear.
Fighting anyone, any group who desires that and will unevitably come to realize it when they come to power is perfectly just, justified and will always be. Fuck you.

So, Nazi fantasies, which you determine to be "pretty damn clear", are to be preemptively addressed with you instigating violence.
I am sure the judge will be very sympathetic.

[Giest118]

No Xyga, I'm sure Hitler never advocated mass murder on the scale that you have. Absolutely sure of it. That would be stupid.

[Xyga]

Thank you guys for showing you're very well as I described.

[Giest118]

POINTING OUT THAT MY WORDS MEAN EXACTLY WHAT I MEANT THEM TO MEAN MEANS THAT YOU GUYS ARE DUMB

[Xyga]

:yawn: