Nemo wrote:
For me it is, if you're only capable of understanding things which can be scientifically proven, then you're not believing anything, you're simply accepting information.
So if I tell someone that I have the ability, when divinely inspired, to fire invisible ICBMs out of my ass, and they believe me, they're a better/wiser/stronger person for it?
Bingo wrote:That's the paradox in 'freedom', isn't it? All facets of our freedom that in any way do or could enter the sphere of another individual are really given to us as an extension of that person's tolerance. And vice versa. The picture isn't complete when you define anyone's freedom in terms of their isolated rights. After all, where does our freedom stop and theirs begin? When we defend our freedom of expression to piss on our neighbours sentiments, we also diminish our freedom by lowering their tolerance. Like any bargain, of course, this can be one-sided, and passivity isn't the way to alert either side to their role either. Most religious people hold their beliefs so close to their hearts that to not respect them is such a violent intrusion upon their personal freedom it always spells conflict. We may have the right to do it, but I believe it isn't in the best interest of our freedom to exercise it blindly. Diplomacy exists for a reason.
Very well said.
ST Dragon wrote:
homosexuality & marriage of the same sex is not a matter of religious beliefs, but an anomaly and travesty against nature it self.
I'm quite convinced that the positive reading on my sarcasm detector is not in error, but you do hear this argument once in a while. I've always found it quite amusing considering all the homosexual animals I've seen in the past.
