Composite / RGB

See: the discussion of the hue setting on the previous page.tjstogy wrote:Is that the palette that is meant for crts? If so, wtf? I thought it was supposed to look identical.
bobrocks95 wrote:See: the discussion of the hue setting on the previous page.tjstogy wrote:Is that the palette that is meant for crts? If so, wtf? I thought it was supposed to look identical.
NTSC has no built in way to track Hue and Chroma unlike PAL, so each brand has different defaults for them. You can control the Hue and Color on the TV with the knobs for Composite sources, but on RGB inputs they have no effect and you're stuck with whatever you get. If you put the Composite RGB palette on a properly calibrated PVM I'm sure you'd end up seeing the same thing he saw, but with consumer sets anything goes. So there's not really any one single palette that will look like a composite source will on every set.tjstogy wrote:Is that the palette that is meant for crts? If so, wtf? I thought it was supposed to look identical.
NTSC composite is gonna look different from one NTSC crt model(read : decoder) to the other. Thus is the nature of NTSC.tjstogy wrote:Yeah I saw that, but the crt palette is supposed to take account whatever it looks like in composite on a crt including whatever hue shift was there.
Yep. well saidbobrocks95 wrote:He's made a big improvement to the default palettes if you want accuracy, but it will inherently never be perfect thanks to NTSC.
I'd also like to point out he took a pic of SMB overworld, which has the blue sky color I mentioned SEVERAL times cannot be replicated in analog RGB. The voltage is out of range, so it gets clipped in a 0-255 scale. I already have the blue channel maxed at 255 on that entry so what can you do? Lowering the other red and green channels makes the color too dim.FinalBaton wrote:Yep. well saidbobrocks95 wrote:He's made a big improvement to the default palettes if you want accuracy, but it will inherently never be perfect thanks to NTSC.
Are you actually using the Composite Direct palette instead of the NTSC Hardware palette? If you are using original hardware (Such as a CRT) your meant to use the NTSC Hardware palette, not Composite Direct.nakedarthur wrote:I hooked up my composite NES to the KV-25XBR and took comparison pics between stock front-loader and NESRGB with Composite palette. It was really hard to capture just how dull the RGB palette is in person on it. My phone keeps wanting to make the sky much deeper blue than it actually is with a higher overall contrast. Again, I'm not saying the TV's composite is more accurate, just that its sweetening the composite signal and giving it a more colorful picture that some like myself may be more accustomed to.
I tried out both, they're almost identical as FBX said (and as you can see from screencaps on previous page). For people like me hoping to put those on a CRT and magically have a colorful and vivid image they remember, you will probably be disappointed. I don't know why he's acting like I said my TV's composite input is accurate though when I clearly said the opposite. I have two 80s Sony CRTs for reference that look almost identical on default settings with a stock front-loader, and an early 2000s Toshiba that also leans the same way. Anyway, I'm working on a new palette that reflects the more vibrant colors and hues from those CRTs, but not as neon feeling as the FCEUX/Improved palettes. I'm not claiming any sort of accuracy though, just going for a pleasing nostalgic picture I can live with. FBX has done good work capturing a raw composite signal, but personally I want something that looks like what I'm used to.Link83 wrote:Are you actually using the Composite Direct palette instead of the NTSC Hardware palette? If you are using original hardware (Such as a CRT) your meant to use the NTSC Hardware palette, not Composiite Direct.nakedarthur wrote:I hooked up my composite NES to the KV-25XBR and took comparison pics between stock front-loader and NESRGB with Composite palette. It was really hard to capture just how dull the RGB palette is in person on it. My phone keeps wanting to make the sky much deeper blue than it actually is with a higher overall contrast. Again, I'm not saying the TV's composite is more accurate, just that its sweetening the composite signal and giving it a more colorful picture that some like myself may be more accustomed to.
Plus what FBX mentioned above - your CRT composite picture does kind of look over-saturated to me(Like how stores often have their TV's set to the "Vivid" preset, even though thats not how the picture is meant to look)
I think with these new palettes FBX is going for accuracy, and since your used to the more saturated default CRT presets these new palettes are going to look too dim for you (Plus the fact that RGB just doesnt have quite the same color range as NTSC)nakedarthur wrote:I tried out both, they're almost identical as FBX said (and as you can see from screencaps on previous page). For people hoping to put those on a CRT and magically have a colorful and vivid image they remember, you will probably be disappointed. I don't know why he's acting like I said my TV's composite input is accurate, when I clearly said the opposite. I have two 80s Sony CRTs that look almost identical on default settings with a stock front-loader, and an early 2000s Toshiba that also leans the same way. Anyway, I'm working on a new palette that reflects the more vibrant colors and hues from those CRTs, but not as neon feeling as the FCEUX/Improved palettes. I'm not claiming any sort of accuracy though, just going for a pleasing nostalgic picture I can live with.
I was actually looking back for links to compare those older ones, but they appear to be gone. And yea, there's never going to be a single palette or firmware that pleases everyone. You can see it as a curse, but I think it's also kind of cool that we all experienced the NES differently and there's no one right way since every CRT TV treats it differently.Link83 wrote:I think with these new palettes FBX is going for accuracy, and since your used to the more saturated default CRT presets these new palettes are going to look too dim for you (Plus the fact that RGB just doesnt have quite the same color range as NTSC)
Have you tried out the Unsaturated V5 or V6 palettes? I seem to recall they were tweaked slightly and perhaps might be more what your looking for? Beyond that I hope you manage to create a palette that more closely matches what you prefer.
Unfortunately NTSC lives up to its nickname "Never Twice the Same Color", so I dont think theres ever going to be a way to please everybody.
Nice, that looks VERY close to my set! Unfortunately my camera wasn't getting anywhere near what I was actually seeing. Now we just need to get it on an NESRGB firmware
This is exactly correct. It was very common for consumer CRTs to have an intentional "red push" that made red far more saturated than blue or green.nakedarthur wrote:I remember reading a while back that TV makers sweetened the NTSC signal to make their sets stand out in the showroom, for instance to enhance flesh tones and make colors more vibrant. This must be why all these sets are different, as the hue alone doesn't seem to account for the differences between manufacturers.
Trebor wrote:For those interested, the conversion formula (RGB --> YIQ) for this particular decoder matrix is as follows:
Code:
R = Y + 1,630 * I + 0,317 * Q
G = Y - 0,378 * I - 0,466 * Q
B = Y - 1,089 * I + 1,677 * Q
I've been working on the palette I mentioned above and it's almost done. Took way way longer than I expected, but I'm pretty happy with the results. You can see a ton of comparisons on the site. Still trying to get a hold of Tim for a NESRGB firmware..Link83 wrote:I'm surprised there isn't more excitement about finally having an accurate composite NES paletteOr does everyone just have their own memories/interpretation of what the NES palette should look like?
From reading the above posts it seems at least some people prefer the changes that the SONY CXA2025AS TV decoder makes to the picture? I dont seem to be able to find any information about who made the SONY_CXA2025AS_US palette, or how they obtained the initial NES palette values.
Would it not be more accurate to convert the composite direct palette using the CXA2025AS conversion formula?
http://www.mameworld.info/ubbthreads/sh ... ber=353026Trebor wrote:For those interested, the conversion formula (RGB --> YIQ) for this particular decoder matrix is as follows:
Code:
R = Y + 1,630 * I + 0,317 * Q
G = Y - 0,378 * I - 0,466 * Q
B = Y - 1,089 * I + 1,677 * Q
Thx nakedarthur. I like the combinations of palettes in your release. So I am able to get the accurate by FBX and the Sony one.nakedarthur wrote:Great news, just heard back from Tim and the NESRGB firmware is ready! It contains Wavebeam, Sony CXA2025AS, and Hardware Direct (FBX). You can grab it now over on the site...