MintyTheCat wrote:I watched Thief with James Caan. It was pretty good with a nice and gritty feeling. Caan plays a fairly standard toughie role and by he end of the film sorts the bossman out in dramatic fashion.
This is on my list... I think we can get it done before January ends.
Also: Not mention of the soundtrack?
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
A 90's take on a fictional 80's event that never happened involving a Russian Soviet built Stealth Sonar "Caterpillar" propelled engined Typhoon Submarine, Captained by Sean Connery and Sam Neil. The movie tends to lean on politics rather than action, but the nail biting duration of this movie puts it a cut above the rest. If you bite your nails, it must be good.
I saw it for the first time myself last year. I thought it was pretty good. Connery plays the world and system weary senior naval guy pretty well. But his Russian had me chuckling.
I am on a bit of a Cold-War film drive myself at present.
MintyTheCat wrote:I
I have really been into films from the 70s as of late.
Going through that myself -- any definitive lists
.
I did a quick search. Mostly films from this era were more story driven with fairly well developed characterisation. I am not really one for special-effects and like the more down-to-earth almost documentary style of filming.
If anything comes to mind I will post here.
Xyga wrote:^ I like that movie too, though on the sub's propulsion technology part the interesting thing I've learned later is that it might not be as much sci-fi as it looks, something called 'MHD' (magnetohydrodynamics) that in theory could apply to many other fields and for which research supposedly has stopped...or is actually a thing and so effective that it's been held in absolute secrecy for decades from all countries that could somehow afford it.
If you read about it and what it could possibly do it's quite stunning and scary.
As a general rule the theory and application tends to be seperated but most of the time certain industries and sectors get it first. The military are better funded than most and to a real extent get the money for the research.
I always find that the line between 'SciFi' and today is just a matter of time but I am hopeful
A 90's take on a fictional 80's event that never happened involving a Russian Soviet built Stealth Sonar "Caterpillar" propelled engined Typhoon Submarine, Captained by Sean Connery and Sam Neil. The movie tends to lean on politics rather than action, but the nail biting duration of this movie puts it a cut above the rest. If you bite your nails, it must be good.
Some Special effects are a bit dated and there is definitely some iffy camera work in places. I can imagine what it would have been like lugging huge cameras over a submarine which is out to sea with blistering winds (It looks like a few shots used real navy hardware).
John McTiernan directed this, and rarely does anyone mention his name with this film. However, I've not seen this film being mentioned since the 90's. If you haven't seen it, go watch it.
9/10.
John McTiernan directed this? Now I actually want to watch this. For whatever reason last time I played this I wasn't in the mood and stopped it right away after that intro scene. It's still on my hard drive so, yeah.
I shall look into that film - The Man who Stole the Sun, I had not heard of it - thanks.
I watched Serpico, The Taking of Pelham One Two Three and one or two others.
I have been a fan of Pacino's for some time now and he always turns out a good performance.
oh my my..what can i say..everything in this movie is Masterpiece
there's one funny thing about Harrison Ford..his acting is weird in this movie lol..
some funny akward reaction and silly but i really liked it..
just cant wait for Blade Runner 2049
==========
Dangal 2016..Hindi movie
Ammar Khan proves that he's the best in this genr..
outstanding acting and his body changes through film was amazing and unbelievable
i think this movie is his best ever after Three Idiots 2009
MintyTheCat wrote:I watched Thief with James Caan. It was pretty good with a nice and gritty feeling.
just finished watching it..it was good movie..overrated..but good movie
i can see why fans compare it with DRIVE..yea Drive waay better
but Thief is good too..7/10
A film that simultaneously serves as both homage to and parody of the 50s and 60s radio and TV series, with Dan Aykroyd as the overly strait-laced Joe Friday (allegedly a nephew of the original Jack Webb character) and Tom Hanks as the infuriating new partner, with Harry Morgan reprising his original role as Bill Gannon, now their captain and somehow not looking any older than he did on the original show. I watched the 60s TV show on Nick at Nite quite a bit back when they had it on, and to me the movie played up the Joe Friday character a bit too much. It probably would have made a better drama than a comedy, and I normally like these types of movies.
oh my my..what can i say..everything in this movie is Masterpiece
there's one funny thing about Harrison Ford..his acting is weird in this movie lol..
some funny akward reaction and silly but i really liked it..
I liked the cleaned up picture but I didn't really like the changes to the final cut. Especially the awkwardly ADR'ed lines immediately following the head crush. How stupid do you think your audience is, Ridley, that you didn't think we could figure out what happens to JF Sebastian? I also prefer the line "I want life... fucker!"
Two working class dudes, one black one white, just baked a tray of ten cookies together.
An oligarch walks in and grabs nine cookies for himself.
Then he says to the white dude "Watch out for that black dude, he wants a piece of your cookie!"
Mischief Maker wrote:
I liked the cleaned up picture but I didn't really like the changes to the final cut. Especially the awkwardly ADR'ed lines immediately following the head crush. How stupid do you think your audience is, Ridley, that you didn't think we could figure out what happens to JF Sebastian? I also prefer the line "I want life... fucker!"
Same, those changes didn't sit right with me at all.
Not a movie, but I just got done binging Stranger Things. Really enjoyed it. It's like a mash-up of Twin Peaks and Silent Hill as interpreted by an E.T.-era Spielberg or a Goonies-era Donner, with Guillermo del Toro stepping in for the spooky bits. And that synthwave title track is so damn authentic.
MintyTheCat wrote:I watched Thief with James Caan. It was pretty good with a nice and gritty feeling. Caan plays a fairly standard toughie role and by he end of the film sorts the bossman out in dramatic fashion.
I also watched The French Connection parts one and two. I had seen the first one eons back but never the second one. The first one is a bit better I felt.
I have really been into films from the 70s as of late.
Post all the 70's flicks you watch, Minty. I'm interested to see what you come across; it's one of my favorite decades for cinema. A few I watched recently worth mentioning:
'Long Weekend', 'Don't Look Now', 'Wake in Fright'
MintyTheCat wrote:
I am on a bit of a Cold-War film drive myself at present.
It's not a 70's film, but check out 'The Lives of Others'.
kaicooper wrote:
just finished watching it..it was good movie..overrated..but good movie
i can see why fans compare it with DRIVE..yea Drive waay better
but Thief is good too..7/10
Do you mean 'The Driver'? Drive and Thief have next to nothing in common.
Mischief Maker wrote:
I liked the cleaned up picture but I didn't really like the changes to the final cut. Especially the awkwardly ADR'ed lines immediately following the head crush. How stupid do you think your audience is, Ridley, that you didn't think we could figure out what happens to JF Sebastian? I also prefer the line "I want life... fucker!"
Same, those changes didn't sit right with me at all.
The "father" line sits right with me, since it's a line recovered from the Workprint, which is the original cut of the film. The "fucker" was dubbed in for the commercial release inexplicably, since "Father" is completely appropriate considering the context.
A great wealth of additions and changes in the Final Cut come from the recovered workprint, from the more vibrant colours, to the added violence, and even the hockey mask Geisha girls.
Tregard wrote:
Not a movie, but I just got done binging Stranger Things. Really enjoyed it. It's like a mash-up of Twin Peaks and Silent Hill as interpreted by an E.T.-era Spielberg or a Goonies-era Donner, with Guillermo del Toro stepping in for the spooky bits. And that synthwave title track is so damn authentic.
for me..80's geek..Stranger Things is the best Gift ever
cant wait for this year Season 2
All I can say is that's the most massive and obscene orgy of high-quality computer generated contents I have ever seen. (Pirates of the Caribbean series coming close)
Don't get me wrong, in many places it looks really gorgeous, even more so than the LotR trilogy.
But as a film it is so empty, there's hardly anything to talk about, just entertainment, the first two parts felt okay because of the journey, the dragon and all, but the finale is just a never-ending action flick not even the expensive CGI manage to save from flat-out boring mediocrity.
PS: oh yes almost forgot the musical moments...I fucking hate those to death in any film/cartoon. Argh. Just skipped.
Amazing, as I'm sure everyone here knows. Not my first time to see it, but I definitely waited far too long. Ambitious camera work like this goes far too unnoticed. Not only inspires me to be a better photog, but to be more like Clive Owen as I age.
Boogie Nights [1997]
Another rewatch. Hadn't seen it in a while. Very entertaining. God bless Heather Graham and her amazing tits. I miss bell bottoms and funky clothes. The lumberjack and skinny pants shit needs to go.
RegalSin wrote:New PowerPuff Girls. They all have evil pornstart eyelashes.
Terrible, extremely terrible. Characters had no logical motivations, the flashback sequence was so overused... Even the drawn out chase scene at the end felt disjointed and without purpose. This one is much worse than the Bourne Legacy, which is saying a lot. What a disappointment, coming from a fan of the first three Bourne movies
I didn't like Kung Fury. The good thing about Stranger Things and Turbo Kid is they're fully functional movies in their own right even if you took out all the 80s fanservice. Kung Fury was literally nothing but fanservice and past the first five minutes it really wore out its welcome.
Two working class dudes, one black one white, just baked a tray of ten cookies together.
An oligarch walks in and grabs nine cookies for himself.
Then he says to the white dude "Watch out for that black dude, he wants a piece of your cookie!"
Terrible, extremely terrible. Characters had no logical motivations, the flashback sequence was so overused... Even the drawn out chase scene at the end felt disjointed and without purpose. This one is much worse than the Bourne Legacy, which is saying a lot. What a disappointment, coming from a fan of the first three Bourne movies
Yeah, I couldn't finish watching it myself. And really, I don't like any of the Bourne sequels. But the first I enjoy.
All I can say is that's the most massive and obscene orgy of high-quality computer generated contents I have ever seen. (Pirates of the Caribbean series coming close)
Don't get me wrong, in many places it looks really gorgeous, even more so than the LotR trilogy.
But as a film it is so empty, there's hardly anything to talk about, just entertainment, the first two parts felt okay because of the journey, the dragon and all, but the finale is just a never-ending action flick not even the expensive CGI manage to save from flat-out boring mediocrity.
PS: oh yes almost forgot the musical moments...I fucking hate those to death in any film/cartoon. Argh. Just skipped.
Extended? The theatrical version already added too much filler when the book could have been fully covered with just one film.
Yes, but as I said this is kind of the longest and most expensive video game cutscene ever.
If you have to marathon it why not a few more minutes so you're certain to be absolutely full - gushing - of expensive pixels for the next few years ?
Amazing, as I'm sure everyone here knows. Not my first time to see it, but I definitely waited far too long. Ambitious camera work like this goes far too unnoticed. Not only inspires me to be a better photog, but to be more like Clive Owen as I age.
Would have helped if the director didn't cheat, though i guess the cuts weren't really noticeable.
"I" of course did not like the film. Interesting visuals and camera techniques aside, i wasn't taken by either the story or the characters, and i felt the movie ended in a whimper.
